Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

[UFCBlackbelt]

For example, Bruce Lee's jab counts as a sig strike. I think so does Thompson. Makes it easy to rack up points.

[Solid_Altair]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

I'm not sure, but I think sig strikes don't make any difference. What matters is the damage you deal or if the strike is from the stand up, or grappling.

[aholbert32]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

For example, Bruce Lee's jab counts as a sig strike. I think so does Thompson. Makes it easy to rack up points.

Sig strike numbers have nothing to do with the judging criteria. When it comes to striking only the damage caused by them does.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[UFCBlackbelt]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

Sig strike numbers have nothing to do with the judging criteria. When it comes to striking only the damage caused by them does.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Ah ok that changes what i thought

[FCB x Finlay]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

Sig strike numbers have nothing to do with the judging criteria. When it comes to striking only the damage caused by them does.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

So is it only damage that is judged upon at all?

[RomeroXVII]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

Sig strike numbers have nothing to do with the judging criteria. When it comes to striking only the damage caused by them does.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Wow, I had no clue. Anything else about judging criteria the general public may not know about?

[aholbert32]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

So is it only damage that is judged upon at all?

When it comes it’s striking, yes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[aholbert32]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

Wow, I had no clue. Anything else about judging criteria the general public may not know about?

It’s based on the new mma judging criteria.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[FCB x Finlay]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

When it comes it’s striking, yes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

As the main criteria i hope, please dont tell me theres no barometer for effectivness, duration, aggression, octogon control. I have reread the rules and tbh it doesnt help things, Im still seeing three criterias, being damage, domination and duration. With damage being slightly higher weighted.

Under the new rules how would you score the romero vs whittaker 2 fight. Ive seen it two ways using the new rules?

[aholbert32]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

As the main criteria i hope, please dont tell me theres no barometer for effectivness, duration, aggression, octogon control. I have reread the rules and tbh it doesnt help things, Im still seeing three criterias, being damage, domination and duration. With damage being slightly higher weighted.

Under the new rules how would you score the romero vs whittaker 2 fight. Ive seen it two ways using the new rules?

3-2 Romero. When it comes to striking its who comes the closes to finishing the fight. In round 3, 4 and 5, Romero had Whittaker seriously hurt in each round.

Octagon control and aggression no longer play a major role in the new criteria.

[Phillyboi207]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

3-2 Romero. When it comes to striking its who comes the closes to finishing the fight. In round 3, 4 and 5, Romero had Whittaker seriously hurt in each round.

Octagon control and aggression no longer play a major role in the new criteria.

Interesting

Big John himself said a draw and he wrote the rules lol.

[FCB x Finlay]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

3-2 Romero. When it comes to striking its who comes the closes to finishing the fight. In round 3, 4 and 5, Romero had Whittaker seriously hurt in each round.

Octagon control and aggression no longer play a major role in the new criteria.

Again your not quite understanding the rules, your forgetting the importance of effectiveness, duration and domination. 10-9 is when a fighter wins by a close margin and 10-8 is when they win buy a large margin. So i had it 10-8 bob, 10-9 bob, 10-9 yoel, 10-9 bob and then 10-8 yoel.

[aholbert32]

Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

Again your not quite understanding the rules, your forgetting the importance of effectiveness, duration and domination. 10-9 is when a fighter wins by a close margin and 10-8 is when they win buy a large margin. So i had it 10-8 bob, 10-9 bob, 10-9 yoel, 10-9 bob and then 10-8 yoel.

I understand the rules well. I had round 4 for Romero and I didn’t think that Bob was effective or dominant for any significant amount of time. Romero clearly won on the damage side unless you are counting his Whitaker’s low blow.

Don’t know how round 1 was a 10-8 for Bob.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[aholbert32]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

Interesting



Big John himself said a draw and he wrote the rules lol.

Yeah it was a close fight. I saw plenty of people who had Romero winning the last 3. The only way it’s a draw is if you see round 4 as a draw and I don’t.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[WarMMA]

Re: Certain fighters jabs counting as sig strikes

Romero definitely won that fight imo. Judges didn't even give the guy one 10-8 round lol.