You shouldn’t have to see him fight a top 5 fighter to see how good he is. Any professional fighter can “survive” a flawless attack. Anyone in the top 15 can “survive” against the champ in their division, if they just fight defensively and accept the L. Pretty much every newcomer in the UFC now has the skills to NOT get dominated.
Jones went to a decision with Stephan Bonnar. Yet he finished Shogun a year or two later. Holly Holm barely edged out Raquel Pennington, yet dominated Rousey. Cejudo lost to Benavidez, then beat DJ. Performances against lower rated fighters are not indicative of how a fighter will do against higher rated fighters. It’s about the skills a fighter displays, and how those skills match up against the skills of the best fighters in the world.
When I see stuff like “Bochniak landed punches on Zabit” or “Michael Johnson landed on Khabib”, I just shake my head. It’s like, why? Why are you pointing that out? Daniel Cormier scratched his belly button once. What’s the relevance? It’s as if you’re trying to say Zabit isn’t good because a professional fighter landed a few desperation punches for a moral victory in the final round.
Comment