Re: NEW Analog STRIKING mechanics (concept, ideas, discussions)
That is not an acceptable use of the word "proof".
Releasing R2 and then either holding or flicking the stick in another direction is in no way elegant. Notice I said you probably DO have a solution, but I was absolutely right, it was janky and convoluted by design. Right now I can easily flick the stick, hit a button, and then immediately flick the stick and hit another button (creating a chain of slip, punch, slip, punch). Four inputs for four actions. That's elegant design.
Holding R2 with the stick and then releasing the stick immediately while simultaneously yanking the stick in the opposite direction to strike (which you would have to because slipping and punching toward the same side is not fluid), then clicking R2 and pushing the stick another direction only to then AGAIN immediately release R2 and jerk the stick over to get a strike out is NOT good game design. That's a lot of inputs for four actions. And for what? Because the alternative is to press three buttons at once for moves that should only be used sparingly? You're throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Seriously. You think that is more intuitive than what we have now? I finally figured out why you perpetuate so many bad ideas. You're all theory, no practice. Try that right stick sequence on your controller and let me know how it goes for you. You think up all these in depth designs without actually putting thought into how it would play out in reality. This is exactly like your claim that you were unstoppable with minor side lunges without even testing it against a human. Take a second to breath instead of creating massive walls of text.
And by the way, I know you're emotionally hurt by your ideas being dissected, but I'll humor you. The reason you don't see my topics is because: 1. I only make them for things that are important to share. 2. All of my ideas are backed up by facts and in game knowledge/footage. There are no arguments in my topics, meaning they don't span 40 pages debating whether or not I'm stupid. They get read and then filed away.
You even saw my topic where I put down all my notes and then did the same thing with a topic of your own afterwards. Let's not play dumb here.
That is not an acceptable use of the word "proof".
Releasing R2 and then either holding or flicking the stick in another direction is in no way elegant. Notice I said you probably DO have a solution, but I was absolutely right, it was janky and convoluted by design. Right now I can easily flick the stick, hit a button, and then immediately flick the stick and hit another button (creating a chain of slip, punch, slip, punch). Four inputs for four actions. That's elegant design.
Holding R2 with the stick and then releasing the stick immediately while simultaneously yanking the stick in the opposite direction to strike (which you would have to because slipping and punching toward the same side is not fluid), then clicking R2 and pushing the stick another direction only to then AGAIN immediately release R2 and jerk the stick over to get a strike out is NOT good game design. That's a lot of inputs for four actions. And for what? Because the alternative is to press three buttons at once for moves that should only be used sparingly? You're throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Seriously. You think that is more intuitive than what we have now? I finally figured out why you perpetuate so many bad ideas. You're all theory, no practice. Try that right stick sequence on your controller and let me know how it goes for you. You think up all these in depth designs without actually putting thought into how it would play out in reality. This is exactly like your claim that you were unstoppable with minor side lunges without even testing it against a human. Take a second to breath instead of creating massive walls of text.
And by the way, I know you're emotionally hurt by your ideas being dissected, but I'll humor you. The reason you don't see my topics is because: 1. I only make them for things that are important to share. 2. All of my ideas are backed up by facts and in game knowledge/footage. There are no arguments in my topics, meaning they don't span 40 pages debating whether or not I'm stupid. They get read and then filed away.
You even saw my topic where I put down all my notes and then did the same thing with a topic of your own afterwards. Let's not play dumb here.
Comment