The devs dont know if there is an issue with the judging unless people post it. Also this forum has a real issue with overstating problems.
I'll give you an example of a real judging problem. When the game was released, it scored sub attempts (whether they were long or short) extremely high. So people could just attempt a subs on the ground, lose the sub after one stage and pretty much guarantee a decision. This happened in every fight if someone spammed subs. What happened? The devs fixed that in the first or second patch.
One think I've noticed on OS is when people post the stats people tend to agree with the poster. But when people actually post the videos of the fight...the community typically sees how the judges couldve made their decision. I hear people talking about how they've had tons of fights that resulted in bad decisions and they post screenshots but no one ever posts the video (and posting a vid takes maybe 2 min longer). It handicaps the team's ability to fix the issue.
I completely agree that the stats in this one shouldve lead to a Cerrone win but that doesnt mean that the judging is overall "broken". It means that one scenario lead to a bad decision. There are likely other scenarios that lead to bad decisions too and the only way to discover that is by people posting videos and the devs and community analyzing why it happened.
Comment