UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • youngkrz
    Rookie
    • Sep 2008
    • 42

    #1

    UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

    Now i know most of you have seen probably seen this already, its the list of the fighters and to the right is their rank in the game. I was surprised and disapointed with the way the fighters are ranked.



    Heres my reason why im disappointed:

    1. I think they completely messed up the ranks. Some examples would be Tim Slyvia,Thiago Silva, Cain Velasquez they are not the elite in their divisions and their ranked as the elite.

    2. Another thing that disappointed me was that there were no fighters ranked 100. Some people can argue that it wouldn't be fun to have someone better than the rest, but i think they should have made the someone who is great ranked atleast above 95.

    You guys can agree or disagree with me, let me know
  • Dr.J
    Pro
    • Sep 2006
    • 475

    #2
    Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

    There is already a discussion about rankings here,

    http://www.operationsports.com/forum...-revelaed.html
    "Always be yourself, express yourself, have faith in yourself, do not go out and look for a successfull personality and duplicate it. "
    Bruce Lee

    Comment

    • Gotmadskillzson
      Live your life
      • Apr 2008
      • 23428

      #3
      Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

      With all sports games, you will never see a team or player ranked 100. And you got to keep in mind those ranks were done a few ways back, so at that time, some fighters were at the top, but then fell off recently.

      Comment

      • youngkrz
        Rookie
        • Sep 2008
        • 42

        #4
        Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

        Originally posted by Gotmadskillzson
        With all sports games, you will never see a team or player ranked 100. And you got to keep in mind those ranks were done a few ways back, so at that time, some fighters were at the top, but then fell off recently.
        I agree with you, however the highest ranking is 94, and there are definetly fighters over 94

        Comment

        • Darkleaf
          MVP
          • Feb 2006
          • 1685

          #5
          Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

          I think the ratings are a little high for all of the fighters. LMAO at having someone rated 100.

          Comment

          • wilsfaber
            Banned
            • May 2009
            • 26

            #6
            Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

            at least they ranked their TUF reality show contestants really high - nice to see the UFC is still the consistent marketing machine force-feeding the show down everyones throats

            Comment

            • Gotmadskillzson
              Live your life
              • Apr 2008
              • 23428

              #7
              Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

              Not a lot of fighters that deserve to be in the 90s period. And most certainly not over 94. The only fighters in my opinion that deserve to be in the 90s are the following:

              Anderson Silva
              GSP
              BJ Penn
              Matt Hughes
              Chuck Lidell

              Everybody else is rated too high.

              Comment

              • Darkleaf
                MVP
                • Feb 2006
                • 1685

                #8
                Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

                Originally posted by Gotmadskillzson
                Not a lot of fighters that deserve to be in the 90s period. And most certainly not over 94. The only fighters in my opinion that deserve to be in the 90s are the following:

                Anderson Silva
                GSP
                BJ Penn
                Matt Hughes
                Chuck Lidell

                Everybody else is rated too high.
                I agree with all of your post except the Hughes and Liddell being in the 90's part.

                Comment

                • SHO
                  Give us a raise, loser!
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 2045

                  #9
                  Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

                  I still don't see how losing to Big Nog and Fedor means that Sylvia is no longer a top HW in such a paper thin division as HW, especially in the UFC where they don't even have the top 3 HWs in the world. Nog and Feder were quite a jump in talent in comparsion to who he typically fought and if he was still in the UFC he'd still be in the conversation for top HW.

                  Then again, I was never impressed with Sylvia, but he's still clearly a Top 8 (at worst) HW.

                  Comment

                  • Gotmadskillzson
                    Live your life
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 23428

                    #10
                    Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

                    I would only put Hughes and Lidell at 90 because they were so dominant in their division for so long.

                    Comment

                    • phillyfan23
                      MVP
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 2309

                      #11
                      Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

                      Originally posted by Gotmadskillzson
                      I would only put Hughes and Lidell at 90 because they were so dominant in their division for so long.
                      ya but then people would complain that the ratings are not up to date.

                      Liddell in his heyday was over 90 but now 88 is fair for him. Hughes has a 90 in the game right....I think that's wee high for him for now.

                      That's why it would be nice if they had a player rating editor for this game, would make offline game tuneable to everyone's tastes. You can make a 2006 Liddell then adjust and have a 2009 version.

                      Comment

                      • Gotmadskillzson
                        Live your life
                        • Apr 2008
                        • 23428

                        #12
                        Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

                        Yeah that would be great if they had living rosters like other sports games have now.

                        Comment

                        • MC Fatigue
                          Banned
                          • Feb 2006
                          • 4150

                          #13
                          Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

                          Originally posted by Gotmadskillzson
                          Not a lot of fighters that deserve to be in the 90s period. And most certainly not over 94. The only fighters in my opinion that deserve to be in the 90s are the following:

                          Anderson Silva
                          GSP
                          BJ Penn
                          Matt Hughes
                          Chuck Lidell

                          Everybody else is rated too high.
                          Kenny Florian is quite deserving of being in the 90's.

                          Comment

                          • ChubbyBanana
                            Don't Trust Influencers
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 7071

                            #14
                            Re: UFC Fighters Ranks in Game =(

                            Please use this thread for ranking discussions:

                            http://www.operationsports.com/forum...-revelaed.html
                            Not A Moderator
                            Extra Life 2017
                            Twitter

                            Twitch Stream

                            Comment

                            Working...