UFC 2009 Undisputed Detailed Fighter Stats w/ Screenshots
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
UFC 2009 Undisputed Detailed Fighter Stats w/ Screenshots
Someone from the Sherdog Forums has posted a ton of detailed fighter stats for UFC 2009 Undisputed. Screenshots are included.
"Alright peeps, I figure it would be cool to have all the Stats w/pics in one place to make bitching about the programmers a little more organized and easy. So here are the ones Ive discovered so far, more to come (if you have some I havent posted, feel free to add them)."Tags: None -
Re: Some Detailed Fighter Stats (Pics)
?
Cro Cop is higher in Kicks, which is what he should be higher in. Cro Cop is a great boxer but the power in Lesnar's hands is ridiculous. Lesnar's higher striking offense represents that.Last edited by DakkoN; 05-13-2009, 02:46 AM.Comment
-
Re: Some Detailed Fighter Stats (Pics)
Some of those ratings seem a bit on the low side...Lesnar with 82 strength, Wand and Anderson with striking offense in the 70s, highest rating on there was Cro Cops kick offense at 92...GSP hasn't missed a takedown in like 3 or 4 fights and has become probably the most dominant wrestler in the UFC but his takedowns are at 88 and his ground striking is terrible. Theres no ratings for chin, body, cuts, or heart. And whats with Hendo's ridiculously low sub defense? Apparently, nobody has seen his fights against Big Nog. Not to mention he's the slowest fighter with stats listed. The good news is, from the demo, the game looks awesome, I have issues with the ratings though.Comment
-
Re: Some Detailed Fighter Stats (Pics)
But Hendo will never be fighting Brock in the game. Apples and oranges. Can't compare people in completely different weight classes who will never fight each other in the game. Have to see how they perform.Comment
-
Re: Some Detailed Fighter Stats (Pics)
I'm also liking Florian's stats - I was hoping for good kicking, good clinch, and good submissions. I got what I was expecting. To be honest, aside from Sadollah, he's the only fighter I even care about on my team.Last edited by MC Fatigue; 05-13-2009, 08:01 AM.Comment
-
Re: Some Detailed Fighter Stats (Pics)
Its obvious that the ratings apply to each weight class. If Henderson has an 82 at MW and Brock has an 82 at heavy...it doesnt mean they have the same strength.Comment
-
Re: Some Detailed Fighter Stats (Pics)
Some of those ratings seem a bit on the low side...Lesnar with 82 strength, Wand and Anderson with striking offense in the 70s, highest rating on there was Cro Cops kick offense at 92...GSP hasn't missed a takedown in like 3 or 4 fights and has become probably the most dominant wrestler in the UFC but his takedowns are at 88 and his ground striking is terrible. Theres no ratings for chin, body, cuts, or heart. And whats with Hendo's ridiculously low sub defense? Apparently, nobody has seen his fights against Big Nog. Not to mention he's the slowest fighter with stats listed. The good news is, from the demo, the game looks awesome, I have issues with the ratings though.
Secondly I think Chin would be striking defence and how effective the block is too.
And as others have said, Brock could ko w/ one punch so it's more of a power thing imo, thus it being higher than other guys.
I'm wondering if 49 is the lowest possible rating - since brock's and others kicks would be there.
If you look at all the ratings in a relative kind of way, they make a lot of sense to me. And I like how some of the ratings especially the 3 core ones are modest - we want it to play well and be a good representation - if these ratings do that under the hood, that's all that counts.
edit - just to add...someone on sherdog was complaining gsp's takedown off isn't higher...but these rating also affect what they do in the octagon, so gsp will strike, but if his tkdwn was higher, maybe all he'd do in the game is go for them more than Rua on expert.Last edited by allBthere; 05-13-2009, 10:45 AM.Liquor in the front, poker in the rear.Comment
-
Re: Some Detailed Fighter Stats (Pics)
These ratings are a big let down IMHO. Many of them are a mess. By the way cro cop has some of the strongest strikes while being extremely accurate in the process with his hands. He has always been known for his great kicks, but also his super acurate hands, that while not the strongest in the game, will put you down pretty fast.Comment
-
Re: Some Detailed Fighter Stats (Pics)
That's too bad...just read through a bunch of threads and one guy who has the game and is doing a review is spilling a bunch of beans. Everything seems good, but the CAF nicknames are only 10 strong. That's right, 100 CAF slots, but only 10 nicknames.
I'll be using "The Doctor" for me.
off the top of my head the others were;
hands of stone
Buzzsaw
Quick Silver
El ____ (steriotypical latino name)
the fury (or something close)
Razon Sharp
...that's all I can remember for now, the last 3 were probably too 'forgettable'.
this guy's review will be posted friday, and either I'll link it then or someone else will.Liquor in the front, poker in the rear.Comment
-
-
Re: Some Detailed Fighter Stats (Pics)
These ratings are a big let down IMHO. Many of them are a mess. By the way cro cop has some of the strongest strikes while being extremely accurate in the process with his hands. He has always been known for his great kicks, but also his super acurate hands, that while not the strongest in the game, will put you down pretty fast.Comment
-
Re: Some Detailed Fighter Stats (Pics)
I read the sherdog link and someone posted a link to the undisputed.net forums where they posted a preview - and the previewer kept posting things including the pics in sherdog, and other info. I think it's the 3rd page of the sherdog thread is where the other link is. After that it's like 30 pages of occassional posts by the previewer and questions from the mob.Liquor in the front, poker in the rear.Comment
Comment