SmackDown vs. RAW 2006 Interview
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: SmackDown vs. RAW 2006 Interview
Nice to hear they're improving the A.I.
Don't like the sound of what they did with finishers. Seems it would be really bad for submission moves.
The hardcore rating should be cool but stamina systems are either awesome(Fire Pro) or totally suck(Raw) but from the description they have the Fire Pro system so it might work and it's an option anyway.
Longer matches are good but hopefully not too long. Don't need any 45 minute matches like Raw 2.
More grapples is a good thing.
Buried alive match doesn't seem all that intersting. They should've ripped Ultimate X.
More backstage areas is great.
Hope the profile system works better than WM21.
Big upgrade for WWE people,hope that doesn't mean big downgrade for C.A.W. wich they won't talk about.
Overall it should be better than SD vs Raw 1. -
Re: SmackDown vs. RAW 2006 Interview
Originally posted by Longhorn6Honestly, I think after not purchasing the first SvR, I might have to buy this one. It seems very, very entertaining.Comment
-
Re: SmackDown vs. RAW 2006 Interview
Just got finished reading the long interview and I must say I'm encouraged. Mainly at all the improvements listed without even touching on some of the major issues, like season advancements, online, and the roster outside of it being bigger which is great news. If they brought back the tag team belts and the cruiserweight belt I may have to reserve this game.Comment
-
Re: SmackDown vs. RAW 2006 Interview
The Buried Alive match should be an entertaining match and I know that I'm looking forward to it.
I also hope that they fix the voice overs. SvsR 1 had WAY too many repeats. I also hope that they storymode will not be the same for each wrestler that you be.UL's QB Lamar Jackson, yeah that kid is good!!!Comment
Comment