Ok, first let me preface this by saying that I do watch TNA. I am one of the people that watches it purely for enjoyment. I also really enjoy WWE. I don't compare them. I try to think of them not as competition, but as two companies that offer an entirely different product. While I do enjoy TNA for the most part, I do struggle to understand why their bookers continue to try and market the Jarretts, Stings, and Steiners; while they have young, exciting stars already employed.
Watch this video...
That right there is proof that TNA should be a marketable, profitable company. Those guys in that match are stars, and that match was something that you will never see in WWE. But it is also something that people want to see.
If TNA would hype and market the X-Division and supplement that with guys like Samoa Joe (who has no place in the X-Division), Christian Cage, Abyss, and Rhyno, then they would see a boom in viewership and could potentially break through and compete with WWE.
I know there are some of you that purely think that TNA is a waste, but after watching that video, can you honestly say that? Those guys are extremely talented, they deserve somewhere to showcase their skills.
Discuss....
Watch this video...
That right there is proof that TNA should be a marketable, profitable company. Those guys in that match are stars, and that match was something that you will never see in WWE. But it is also something that people want to see.
If TNA would hype and market the X-Division and supplement that with guys like Samoa Joe (who has no place in the X-Division), Christian Cage, Abyss, and Rhyno, then they would see a boom in viewership and could potentially break through and compete with WWE.
I know there are some of you that purely think that TNA is a waste, but after watching that video, can you honestly say that? Those guys are extremely talented, they deserve somewhere to showcase their skills.
Discuss....
Comment