The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Santino
    MVP
    • Nov 2008
    • 1296

    #1726
    Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

    Originally posted by dochalladay32
    Speaking of Booker, where did all the people go talking about how great Rhodes is for the IC belt. Has he done anything with it since that feud (that we all knew how it would end) with Booker T? Not to mention that was months ago and now he is in a match he will be guaranteed to lose. I think my point stands; the only good thing out of this reign so far is replacing the belt unless they have something big planned coming out of EC with him... I smell a Santino/Khali feud vs. Cody going into Wrestlemania.
    Cody's feud with Booker ended a little over a month ago. Since then he has defended against Ezekiel, dominated a mini feud with Justin Gabriel, and had the most eliminations in the Royal Rumble. How is this bad for the title again?

    Comment

    • GnarlyKing
      MVP
      • Jul 2003
      • 1669

      #1727
      Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

      Originally posted by Santino
      Cody's feud with Booker ended a little over a month ago. Since then he has defended against Ezekiel, dominated a mini feud with Justin Gabriel, and had the most eliminations in the Royal Rumble. How is this bad for the title again?
      It really isn't. He may not be defending the belt all the time, but that's also partly due to all the guys who could be challengers that he hasn't feuded with yet being injured.

      Comment

      • Redacted01
        Hall Of Fame
        • Aug 2007
        • 10316

        #1728
        Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

        Originally posted by Santino
        Cody's feud with Booker ended a little over a month ago. Since then he has defended against Ezekiel, dominated a mini feud with Justin Gabriel, and had the most eliminations in the Royal Rumble. How is this bad for the title again?
        I forgot about the Gabriel thing. But really? You use Ezekiel as evidence? I don't think I saw him before that match and haven't seen him since, that I recall.

        Comment

        • DonkeyJote
          All Star
          • Jul 2003
          • 9192

          #1729
          Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

          Originally posted by GnarlyKing
          That probably won't happen if the MITB match goes back to WM this year. If it does, it's highly likely Rhodes will be in it, and he'll be one of the favorites to win it. Although I don't think that's been confirmed, and since they moved TLC to July, it makes just as much since for the match to be part of that instead.
          I don't think he'll be in MITB. I think I read somewhere they wanted MITB to be all former World Champions.

          And I'm personally very okay with him trying to become a dual champion. Especially since he keeps talking about it. I think it would make the championship seem like less if he wasn't in the match. If being Intercontinental Champion doesn't mean you are one of the six best guys on the roster, that makes the championship look bad, imo. I think they're doing a much better job with that belt than the US Title - Swagger wasn't even on RAW this week, was he?
          Last edited by DonkeyJote; 02-16-2012, 02:11 PM.

          Comment

          • TracerBullet
            One Last Job
            • Jun 2009
            • 22119

            #1730
            Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

            Originally posted by DonkeyJote
            I don't think he'll be in MITB. I think I read somewhere they wanted MITB to be all former World Champions.

            And I'm personally very okay with him trying to become a dual champion. Especially since he keeps talking about it. I think it would make the championship seem like less if he wasn't in the match. If being Intercontinental Champion doesn't mean you are one of the six best guys on the roster, that makes the championship look bad, imo. I think they're doing a much better job with that belt than the US Title - Swagger wasn't even on RAW this week, was he?
            Swagger hasn't been on since that tag team match the week after Cena beat him down I don't think.
            Originally posted by BlueNGold
            I feel weird for liking a post about exposed penises.

            Comment

            • ubernoob
              ****
              • Jul 2004
              • 15522

              #1731
              Swaggers last sighting was defending against Mason Ryan this week on superstars. The other match before the show was tag titles vs santino and Riley.

              Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
              bad

              Comment

              • Santino
                MVP
                • Nov 2008
                • 1296

                #1732
                Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                Originally posted by dochalladay32
                I forgot about the Gabriel thing. But really? You use Ezekiel as evidence? I don't think I saw him before that match and haven't seen him since, that I recall.
                I can remember at least three SmackDown appearances for Zeke throughout Dec/Jan, losing singles matches to Barrett and Rhodes as well as being part of McIntyre's losing streak. He was also in the Rumble.

                Comment

                • Redacted01
                  Hall Of Fame
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 10316

                  #1733
                  Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                  Originally posted by Santino
                  I can remember at least three SmackDown appearances for Zeke throughout Dec/Jan, losing singles matches to Barrett and Rhodes as well as being part of McIntyre's losing streak. He was also in the Rumble.
                  So he lost a couple of times, had a guaranteed victory against Drew "Down the Drain" McIntyre, and was a filler in the Rumble. I still say it was a pointless defense as I think the match against Cody was the first time we had seen him in awhile and it was done just to have a match on TV because there is no one else. They should have kept up a program with DiBiase and Rhodes, but I guess that would have set the bar too high as a baby could hop over it right now.

                  Comment

                  • DonkeyJote
                    All Star
                    • Jul 2003
                    • 9192

                    #1734
                    Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                    Originally posted by dochalladay32
                    So he lost a couple of times, had a guaranteed victory against Drew "Down the Drain" McIntyre, and was a filler in the Rumble. I still say it was a pointless defense as I think the match against Cody was the first time we had seen him in awhile and it was done just to have a match on TV because there is no one else. They should have kept up a program with DiBiase and Rhodes, but I guess that would have set the bar too high as a baby could hop over it right now.
                    They did the feud with DiBiase and Rhodes. What, do you want them to do, have that match six times?

                    Comment

                    • Redacted01
                      Hall Of Fame
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 10316

                      #1735
                      Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                      Originally posted by DonkeyJote
                      They did the feud with DiBiase and Rhodes. What, do you want them to do, have that match six times?
                      Be better than when Orton more-or-less dominated him for a month.

                      Comment

                      • DonkeyJote
                        All Star
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 9192

                        #1736
                        Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                        Originally posted by dochalladay32
                        Be better than when Orton more-or-less dominated him for a month.
                        We'll have to agree to disagree. I feel being in a feud with the #2 guy in the company, and being competitive (sure Orton won, but what do you expect?), is a lot better than drawing out a feud people barely cared about in the first place against a guy who's lucky to be midcard.

                        Comment

                        • Santino
                          MVP
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 1296

                          #1737
                          Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                          Christian tweeted:



                          Someone might get Kofi'd.

                          Comment

                          • Bellsprout
                            Hard Times.
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 25652

                            #1738
                            Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                            If they're removing someone, it has to be Khali.

                            Santino's already in via storyline. Khali's just kind of there because they didn't have anyone else.
                            Member: OS Uni Snob Association | Twitter: @MyNameIsJesseG | #WT4M | #WatchTheWorldBurn
                            Originally posted by l3ulvl
                            A lot of you guys seem pretty cool, but you have wieners.

                            Comment

                            • Mercury112491
                              All Star
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 7426

                              #1739
                              Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                              What does getting Kofi'd mean?

                              Comment

                              • TracerBullet
                                One Last Job
                                • Jun 2009
                                • 22119

                                #1740
                                Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

                                Originally posted by Dayman
                                If they're removing someone, it has to be Khali.

                                Santino's already in via storyline. Khali's just kind of there because they didn't have anyone else.
                                If they do, I'd hope it would be him. I have no desire to watch anything he does.
                                Originally posted by BlueNGold
                                I feel weird for liking a post about exposed penises.

                                Comment

                                Working...