The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

[kingkilla56]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Can they afford for Punk to be a face? Who would be left on that side?

[TheShizNo1]

Can they afford for Punk to be a face? Who would be left on that side?

That's kind of what I was getting at. Outside of Lesnar, I'd think he'd have to immediately turn face. Unless they have him go w/ little Henning or finally push Barrett and the Yodeler.

[DonkeyJote]

That's kind of what I was getting at. Outside of Lesnar, I'd think he'd have to immediately turn face. Unless they have him go w/ little Henning or finally push Barrett and the Yodeler.

There's also Ryback and Ziggler, they could push Barrett, Axel, or Ambrose, or they could turn Orton, Christian, or Sheamus. If they do turn Punk, however, he needs to stay face for a good while. He flips more than anyone else on the roster.

They could turn Brock face too. While he is better as a heel, he used to be a pretty good face too.

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

[BagContainer12]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

They need to push Barrett... His new entrance is him beating Jobbers lol

[55]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Henry and Show are both still ME heels, too...

[DonkeyJote]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Henry and Show are both still ME heels, too...

True, I forgot about them (though there are rumors of Henry turning face soon).

As great as Punk is as a heel, it's probably best for him to be a snarky face. It'd allow them to turn a guy like Orton heel (though, he's basically a upper midcarder as a face, so they could do that anyway) or toy with he idea of turning someone like Sheamus heel.

[BagContainer12]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

True, I forgot about them (though there are rumors of Henry turning face soon).

As great as Punk is as a heel, it's probably best for him to be a snarky face. It'd allow them to turn a guy like Orton heel (though, he's basically a upper midcarder as a face, so they could do that anyway) or toy with he idea of turning someone like Sheamus heel.

Vince loves Face Sheamus and thinks he's great as a face...pffffffft

[philliesfan136]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

This weekend's SmackDown events were headlined by Sheamus vs. Wade Barrett for the Intercontinental Title.

That actually would be a good title feud provided WWE actually knew how to book, and Sheamus was acting serious unlike his clown face self.

[DonkeyJote]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

I liked Sheamus when he first turned face, but he's not funny. At all. They shouldn't be having him make jokes, and being all smiley. He should be a serious guy that thrives on competition.

[Redacted01]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

I liked Sheamus when he first turned face, but he's not funny. At all. They shouldn't be having him make jokes, and being all smiley. He should be a serious guy that thrives on competition.

Isn't that Barrett's gimmick? The bare knuckle fighter that, well, likes to fight?

[kingkilla56]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Isn't that Barrett's gimmick? The bare knuckle fighter that, well, likes to fight?

I thought his gimmick was having an accent.

[DonkeyJote]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

I thought his gimmick was having an accent.

I thought it was going to prom.

[Greekcian]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Isn't that Barrett's gimmick? The bare knuckle fighter that, well, likes to fight?

Nah, I think you're describing Finlay there.

[Redacted01]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Nah, I think you're describing Finlay there.

No, Finlay just loved to fight. He didn't refer to himself as the "bare-knuckle brawler" or whatever Barrett calls it these days.

[goh]

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Wade Barrett lost twice in a row.
Then The Shield lost twice in a row. (by DQ at least and one might be a dark match.)