The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

**Chrisksaint** · 02-11-2011, 09:22 AM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

HHH/Taker has already been done yeah like 10 years ago. Kane/Taker has been done to death and anyone besides those 2 would be boring out of the available opponents for him

**rangerrick012** · 02-11-2011, 11:34 AM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Originally posted by goh

They did HHH/'Taker already and what's that leave Sheamus with? Mark Henry? Tossed into MitB?

So what? No one probably even remembers that match, and throwing HBK in as special guest ref adds a different dynamic as far as whether HBK will screw over Taker or call it down the middle. I see no problem w/ it.

And Sheamus, why not MITB? He probably won't win it, but they could always restart the HHH/Sheamus feud down the line for SS.

**goh** · 02-11-2011, 03:43 PM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

I think it was a pretty memorable match.

Barrett ending the streak and Sheamus beating HHH at WM would do a lot more and go a whole lot further than another HHH/Undertaker match.

**rangerrick012** · 02-11-2011, 04:05 PM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Originally posted by goh

I think it was a pretty memorable match.

Barrett ending the streak and Sheamus beating HHH at WM would do a lot more and go a whole lot further than another HHH/Undertaker match.

1. No chance Barrett goes over Taker at Mania.

2. I agree that Sheamus/HHH w/ Sheamus going over would have been a good route, and could still happen if HHH returns at EC. But if Vince really wants the Taker match to be a big deal, than putting HHH in w/ HBK as guest ref makes sense, and you avoid the issue of everyone knowing Taker would win, which I think would be the case if he faced Barrett.

**Blitz1942** · 02-11-2011, 04:18 PM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Originally posted by Beantown

Could do a buried alive match, or a coffin match, where they have him set the coffin on fire?

But then there's no reason for HBK in the match.

This would be my best guess as to how'd they'd do it. Although, it would be difficult to explain HBK...

Maybe HBK interferes, costing Taker's opponent (whoever that may be) the match, stating, "If I couldn't end the streak, then no one should?" Maybe not the best ending from the fans' perspective, but it would explain HBK's involvement...

**goh** · 02-11-2011, 04:25 PM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Originally posted by rangerrick012

1. No chance Barrett goes over Taker at Mania.

2. I agree that Sheamus/HHH w/ Sheamus going over would have been a good route, and could still happen if HHH returns at EC. But if Vince really wants the Taker match to be a big deal, than putting HHH in w/ HBK as guest ref makes sense, and you avoid the issue of everyone knowing Taker would win, which I think would be the case if he faced Barrett.

See I think it's the opposite. There's no way HHH wins but Barrett would have good shot. Ending the streak does nothing for HHH so it'd be pointless for him to win. It would be extremely useful for Barrett to win thus there being point to it.

**SoxFan01605** · 02-11-2011, 06:01 PM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

So...I hope this isn't true...

Page not found - Wrestlezone

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/article/exclusive-undertakers-wrestlemania-opponent-revealed-123593

**Santino** · 02-11-2011, 06:10 PM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Sounds good to me. Those two had a great one at WM X-7. I really hope Cena is Taker's 20th WM match next year.

**fpac** · 02-11-2011, 06:14 PM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

So Triple H is coming back for a month just to have 1 more match with Taker and then is gone for good? What about Sheamus?

Terrible idea, IMO.

**Chrisksaint** · 02-11-2011, 06:32 PM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Well if HHH was to lose and his "career" was to end I wouldn't be surprised as he seems to be taking on a much bigger role lately in corporate, backstage, and he has like 3 daughters now?

Which then leads me to believe that HBK will be the guest host for WM prolly. I like this idea/match tho this WM desperately needed the wow factor imo, can't get much better available then HHH/Taker 2 of the biggest wrestlers in the WWE.

**rangerrick012** · 02-11-2011, 08:42 PM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

I still think The Rock will likely be Guest Host, doesn't he have a movie coming out later this year? I saw the ad during the SB. Hosting WM would likely be good promotion, and give him the chance to return on a big stage.

**HARLEE23** · 02-11-2011, 09:15 PM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Originally posted by rangerrick012

I still think The Rock will likely be Guest Host, doesn't he have a movie coming out later this year? I saw the ad during the SB. Hosting WM would likely be good promotion, and give him the chance to return on a big stage.

I have predicted that the guest host will be none other than Justin Bieber. The main event match will be Cena and Bieber VS Punk and Otunga.

DJ · 02-12-2011, 01:15 AM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Originally posted by SoxFan01605

So...I hope this isn't true...

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/arti...evealed-123593

I'm all for it, although I wish Trips would've come back a little earlier to build this up and finish off the Sheamus feud. I know he was injured, though, so obviously can't come back until you are ready.

Trips has taken on more responsibilities backstage and when you are doing that, it's hard to be an in-ring performer full-time. Plus, what does Triple H really have left to do in the business, in-ring wise? He's done it all, so I'd be cool if he wanted to retire and help run the company behind the scenes.

**BunnyHardaway** · 02-12-2011, 01:18 AM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Man, I really don't want Trips to retire...I hope that report is false.

**SoxFan01605** · 02-12-2011, 02:32 AM

Re: The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Originally posted by DJ

I'm all for it, although I wish Trips would've come back a little earlier to build this up and finish off the Sheamus feud. I know he was injured, though, so obviously can't come back until you are ready.

Trips has taken on more responsibilities backstage and when you are doing that, it's hard to be an in-ring performer full-time. Plus, what does Triple H really have left to do in the business, in-ring wise? He's done it all, so I'd be cool if he wanted to retire and help run the company behind the scenes.

I have no issue with HHH retiring if that's what this is and I also have no issue with HHH/Taker as a match on it's own, as I'm sure it can be a good show. For the overall angle in the progression of the "world" of WWE it seems contrived though.

You've got Undertaker out with unfinished business with a couple individuals and HHH out with unfinished business with Sheamus. I just don't see how they address all that (satisfactorily at least) without it seeming forced and/or rushed. Ignoring it doesn't make sense either, if one or both of them isn't going to be wrestling anymore afterward. If I can't have closure, at least give me SOME continuity...lol. I just don't think WWE will handle the periphery well, is all. Not to mention, I don't think 2 straight years of "streak vs career" is all that compelling.

I dunno...I just don't like it for this Wrestlemania.

The OS WWE Spoilers Thread

Recommended Videos

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment