TNA Question for you all?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • highheatkingsb
    All Star
    • Jul 2005
    • 8152

    #1

    TNA Question for you all?

    As you all know, I've followed TNA and ordered every show of theirs since Day 1. I purchased all the weekly PPV's and have purchased all the PPV's since their move to Spike TV. I was a huge TNA fan in the days of XXX vs AMW, Jarrett vs Raven, Styles vs Amazing Red vs Jerry Lynn, etc...........my question is, with TNA doing a 1.32 in the ratings, pretty much their highest viewing audience ever, and seems to be finally increasing just a little every week, do you think they would have better ratings if they continued their style from 5 years ago and not had the Angle's, Sting's, Booker T's, etc.......?
    Highheat's O's Franchise
    http://www.operationsports.com/forum...l-attempt.html
  • goh
    Banned
    • Aug 2003
    • 20755

    #2
    Re: TNA Question for you all?

    Yes,I'd start watching it again if they did. It was nice when all the titles pretty much held the same value and it felt like anyone could win one of them. It used to be a good alternative to WWE,now it's a 2nd rate WCW wich was a 3rd rate WWE by the time it was going down. I think maybe the 2 hours might've caused more problems than it fixed.

    Comment

    • CaptainZombie
      Brains
      • Jul 2003
      • 37851

      #3
      Re: TNA Question for you all?

      Originally posted by highheatkingsb
      As you all know, I've followed TNA and ordered every show of theirs since Day 1. I purchased all the weekly PPV's and have purchased all the PPV's since their move to Spike TV. I was a huge TNA fan in the days of XXX vs AMW, Jarrett vs Raven, Styles vs Amazing Red vs Jerry Lynn, etc...........my question is, with TNA doing a 1.32 in the ratings, pretty much their highest viewing audience ever, and seems to be finally increasing just a little every week, do you think they would have better ratings if they continued their style from 5 years ago and not had the Angle's, Sting's, Booker T's, etc.......?
      Did you give up on TNA or something?
      HDMovie Room

      Comment

      • highheatkingsb
        All Star
        • Jul 2005
        • 8152

        #4
        Re: TNA Question for you all?

        Originally posted by GearsX8
        Did you give up on TNA or something?
        No, I'll watch them and WWE forever. AJ winning the Legends title and Suicide (aka Christopher Daniels) winning the X title gives me those feel good moments. First half of the PPV sucked, but the last few matches were great and the reasons I'll always follow.
        Highheat's O's Franchise
        http://www.operationsports.com/forum...l-attempt.html

        Comment

        • goh
          Banned
          • Aug 2003
          • 20755

          #5
          Re: TNA Question for you all?

          Reading the results it seems not a single one of those matches were something that couldn't have been done on Impact especially since the longest was apprently about 14 minutes with the first 5 matches being about a combined 24 and oh yes Joe apprently murdered Steiner.

          Comment

          • WWF80sKid
            All Star
            • Nov 2008
            • 7095

            #6
            Re: TNA Question for you all?

            I think they need to let the X Division have more tv time, and not crap matches either. Some of the stuff from their old days needs to come back, but also, some of the names still need to be there to draw viewers. I love Kurt Angle, and would like to see him wrestle about every week.

            The Beautiful People are nice to see too.

            MICHIGAN WOLVERINES
            1901 | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | 1918 | 1923 | 1932 | 1933 | 1947 | 1948 | 1997 | 2023

            MONTREAL CANADIENS
            1916 | 1924 | 1930 | 1931 | 1944 | 1946 | 1953 | 1956 | 1957 | 1958 | 1959 | 1960 | 1965
            1966 | 1968 | 1971 | 1973 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1986 | 1993

            Comment

            Working...