Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BDKiiing
    Best in the World
    • Jun 2008
    • 9334

    #16
    Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

    Originally posted by goh
    Undertaker hasn't wrestled since April 1st,2012 either so that's still unacceptable. I think a Punk/'Taker match would be worthless without the title but 'Taker only works one day a year too so can't have him win it. Unless they're going to start doing things like the UFC.
    I think it's fine since his title reign would be ended and they would have moved one from that and onto wanting respect again. It's not like Punk is going to go over Taker.
    St. Louis Cardinals | Milwaukee Bucks | Los Angeles Rams
    UWW | UWGB | Duke
    AEW

    Comment

    • goh
      Banned
      • Aug 2003
      • 20755

      #17
      Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

      Originally posted by Dayman
      Did David Arquette work there for 8 years and earn a place as one of the faces of the company?

      I don't care that you guys don't think Rock should win the title, that's fine and I get why, but now you're just being ridiculous.
      Well The Rock hasn't really worked there in 9 years.

      Comment

      • Redacted01
        Hall Of Fame
        • Aug 2007
        • 10316

        #18
        Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

        Originally posted by Dayman
        Did David Arquette work there for 8 years and earn a place as one of the faces of the company?

        I don't care that you guys don't think Rock should win the title, that's fine and I get why, but now you're just being ridiculous.

        Except this is Dwayne Johnson, the movie star, that hasn't worked full time in the WWE in NINE YEARS. He's been out longer than he was actually in. Pat Patterson has worked there for decades. Let's give him a title shot out of the blue! At least he's still in the biz.

        Comment

        • EL_GABE
          Have a V8....POWER!
          • Aug 2009
          • 2372

          #19
          Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

          Im calling it now. there will be "injustice" on the rock tonight
          Psn:EL_GABE
          Add me =)

          GT: MRDONKEYGRANDE

          Comment

          • cactusruss
            Pro
            • Aug 2004
            • 731

            #20
            Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

            #hands2remote

            Comment

            • Bellsprout
              Hard Times.
              • Oct 2009
              • 25652

              #21
              Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

              Originally posted by dochalladay32
              Except this is Dwayne Johnson, the movie star, that hasn't worked full time in the WWE in NINE YEARS. He's been out longer than he was actually in. Pat Patterson has worked there for decades. Let's give him a title shot out of the blue! At least he's still in the biz.
              That doesn't really address what I was talking about, which was the comparison between this and Arquette.

              Like I said, I get why some of you are so vehemently against him winning, but to compare a guy who worked there for the better part of a decade and became a face of the company winning the title to using the title to promote a movie is just not correct.
              Member: OS Uni Snob Association | Twitter: @MyNameIsJesseG | #WT4M | #WatchTheWorldBurn
              Originally posted by l3ulvl
              A lot of you guys seem pretty cool, but you have wieners.

              Comment

              • Chrisksaint
                $$$
                • Apr 2010
                • 19127

                #22
                Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

                #WatchOSBurn #TeamBringIt
                Saints, LSU, Seminoles, Pelicans, Marlins, Lightning

                Comment

                • EL_GABE
                  Have a V8....POWER!
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 2372

                  #23
                  Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

                  #DanielBryan #YES!YES!YES!

                  im on the fence of getting the RR this should will be the main factor hopefully is good

                  #cashinziggler
                  Psn:EL_GABE
                  Add me =)

                  GT: MRDONKEYGRANDE

                  Comment

                  • goh
                    Banned
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 20755

                    #24
                    Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

                    You mean like GI Joe: Retaliation in theatres March 27th starring the WWE champion The Rock! Pick up your tickets for a special screening before Wrestlemania where YOU can "meet" The Rock and co-star Channing Tatum?

                    Comment

                    • PVarck31
                      Moderator
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 16869

                      #25
                      Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

                      #thedazzler

                      I don't know what we're doing.

                      Comment

                      • Chrisksaint
                        $$$
                        • Apr 2010
                        • 19127

                        #26
                        Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

                        Originally posted by goh
                        You mean like GI Joe: Retaliation in theatres March 27th starring the WWE champion The Rock! Pick up your tickets for a special screening before Wrestlemania where YOU can "meet" The Rock and co-star Channing Tatum?
                        There's a difference still, one movie had direct ties with the company. While the Rock could just make random appearances to advertise his movies with the WWE.

                        The Rock possibly winning the title has more to do with the WWE wanting to boost up their image/publicity, they want to be socially relevant,etc. Which in the grand scheme of things I believe they don't mind losing a few of the internet fans if it means they can create a larger presence publicity wise with the Rock as champ for a bit. I think sometimes people forget this is still a business and they run on the same general principles most others do.
                        Saints, LSU, Seminoles, Pelicans, Marlins, Lightning

                        Comment

                        • Bellsprout
                          Hard Times.
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 25652

                          #27
                          Originally posted by goh
                          You mean like GI Joe: Retaliation in theatres March 27th starring the WWE champion The Rock! Pick up your tickets for a special screening before Wrestlemania where YOU can "meet" The Rock and co-star Channing Tatum?
                          Now you're just being stubborn.

                          There's a difference between that and putting your company's top belt on a guy to promote a movie. But you know that.
                          Member: OS Uni Snob Association | Twitter: @MyNameIsJesseG | #WT4M | #WatchTheWorldBurn
                          Originally posted by l3ulvl
                          A lot of you guys seem pretty cool, but you have wieners.

                          Comment

                          • goh
                            Banned
                            • Aug 2003
                            • 20755

                            #28
                            Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

                            It'd still be going to a movie star that's wrestled 9 times in 10 years that will lead to a movie being promo'd.

                            Comment

                            • soltrain
                              The Batman
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 6863

                              #29
                              Re: Raw 01/21/13 - #knees2faces

                              Who is even in the Rumble this year? Remember when they had qualifying matches? Remember when winning the Rumble was a big deal? They have barely talked about it this year.
                              Michigan Wolverines
                              Chicago White Sox

                              Comment

                              • Casino
                                MVP
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 1949

                                #30
                                So we start with "Excuse me!"

                                I hate this lady
                                Fight On for ol' SC
                                Our men Fight On to victory.
                                Our Alma Mater dear,
                                looks up to you
                                Fight On and win
                                For ol' SC
                                Fight On to victory
                                Fight On!

                                Comment

                                Working...