Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

[TheMatrix31]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

The WWE landscape is better when Brock Lesnar shows up, so that in itself makes him more than a "who gives a ****" part-timer. He's not in the same class as The Rock, but those two are about the only ones who can pull off the part-time gig successfully (HBK probably could if he wanted to). I'd take a part-time Brock over full-time Batista any day of the week.

I'd take neither of them any day of the week. Neither of those guys give a **** about wrestling.

The best part-timer is Chris Jericho because when he comes back, he's part of the show week-in, week-out until he's gone or Undertaker with his yearly match-of-the-year candidates.

I don't care about Brock Lesnar and his no-personality, shrieks-like-a-girl, ads-on-his-shorts, stupid-****ing-tattoos doucheosity.

The best thing about Brock Lesnar is Paul Heyman, and that's not a good sign. I don't think there's anything big or noteworthy about beating the **** out of Big Show. One big who cares to me. But hey, I'm alone in that opinion and he's around and making money. I guess that's all that matters.

The entire wrestling universe needs to go away from this part-time **** in general. Be part of the show, make it feel like you're part of the show and not just some side, temporary attraction garbage. It won't because it's making money, but I'm saying the fans need to stop buying into it.

[kingkilla56]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

This isn't a spoiler because I have no facts behind it, but I believe the WWE is playing Bryan perfectly if they are setting this up for a Daniel Bryan win over 'Taker at Mania.

You lost me at win over Taker at Mania. What in the world? All this for a Taker match? If he faces Taker it wouldn't make sense in this story stemming from August and Summerslam. Thats as random as it gets. Plus nobody is beating Taker. So yeah.

Im with Soltrain. Seriously what is the point of booing or cheering anybody? What is the point? I hope the crowd literally turns their back and stays silent while texting on their phones during every BS promo tonight. Send a message that WWE can not ignore. Of course its not gonna happen but it would be amazing to see.

[EL_GABE]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

even tho what happen yesterday i just cant wait for raw to start!
could it be cuz of the crowd reaction tonight?
or on what bryan has to say
the reaction on batista?
idk im just pump for it to begin its mania season could we see taker?
or a black bat

[Bellsprout]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

Oh, let's not forget:

Wait, is there going to be EMMAtainment tonight?

**** that, don't tell me. I don't want to be spoiled.

Know that I will mark out, though. Love Emma.

[TheMatrix31]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

You lost me at win over Taker at Mania. What in the world? All this for a Taker match? If he faces Taker it wouldn't make sense in this story stemming from August and Summerslam. Thats as random as it gets. Plus nobody is beating Taker. So yeah.

Im with Soltrain. Seriously what is the point of booing or cheering anybody? What is the point? I hope the crowd literally turns their back and stays silent while texting on their phones during every BS promo tonight. Send a message that WWE can not ignore. Of course its not gonna happen but it would be amazing to see.

What if Taker is behind the Wyatts?


Personally, I find it funny how the internet is cheering so hard for faces like Punk and Bryan when the internet is usually where the heels get their support. It's an interesting switch over the last couple of years.

[BDKiiing]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

What if Taker is behind the Wyatts?


Personally, I find it funny how the internet is cheering so hard for faces like Punk and Bryan when the internet is usually where the heels get their support. It's an interesting switch over the last couple of years.

Heel and face don't apply to indie darlings.

[kingkilla56]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

What if Taker is behind the Wyatts?


Personally, I find it funny how the internet is cheering so hard for faces like Punk and Bryan when the internet is usually where the heels get their support. It's an interesting switch over the last couple of years.

That would devalue the Wyatts. It can't happen.

Plus it would still be disconnected from the Authority oppressing Bryan story.

On this note, I hope the Wyatts didnt attack Cena because the Authority told them to. That would be mind blowingly broken story telling.

[EL_GABE]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

What if Taker is behind the Wyatts?


Personally, I find it funny how the internet is cheering so hard for faces like Punk and Bryan when the internet is usually where the heels get their support. It's an interesting switch over the last couple of years.

hmmm
wyatts beating on cena...light go off bong hits taker comes out ...stares at wyatts...turns around and tombstones cena..

[Streets]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

There has been a lot of talk about "the line" forming behind Orton.

I think Elimination Chamber has Randall defending in the Chamber against "the line" behind him.

I can't see Bryan being a part of that after Bray beat him nor do I see him winning right before Mania.

So I'm thinking "the line" (Not including Batista) is Brock, Bray, Reigns, Punk, Cena (who will find his way in). I may be forgetting someone. Sheamus?

They all battle it out, fans continue to riot that Bryan isn't among the top 5 contenders.

However, book it now, Bryan will be holding the title at the end of Mania 30. Guaranteed.

[BDKiiing]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

I'd take neither of them any day of the week. Neither of those guys give a **** about wrestling.

The best part-timer is Chris Jericho because when he comes back, he's part of the show week-in, week-out until he's gone or Undertaker with his yearly match-of-the-year candidates.

I don't care about Brock Lesnar and his no-personality, shrieks-like-a-girl, ads-on-his-shorts, stupid-****ing-tattoos doucheosity.

The best thing about Brock Lesnar is Paul Heyman, and that's not a good sign. I don't think there's anything big or noteworthy about beating the **** out of Big Show. One big who cares to me. But hey, I'm alone in that opinion and he's around and making money. I guess that's all that matters.

The entire wrestling universe needs to go away from this part-time **** in general. Be part of the show, make it feel like you're part of the show and not just some side, temporary attraction garbage. It won't because it's making money, but I'm saying the fans need to stop buying into it.

I think Paul Heyman is one of the greatest performers ever. Without a doubt, the greatest manager ever.

Brock is a great worker. Works a very entertaining stiff style, great seller. The only problem I have with his performance is the breaking arms with the Kimura, but that gets him over.

[SmashMan]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

Wait, is there going to be EMMAtainment tonight?

**** that, don't tell me. I don't want to be spoiled.

Know that I will mark out, though. Love Emma.

I'm just assuming. She keeps showing up at things, and Summer looked upset that Emma showed up on Smackdown. It's only been two weeks, but I think we've hit the ceiling on the 'stand in crowd with sign' bit.

[Thrash13]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

I'd take neither of them any day of the week. Neither of those guys give a **** about wrestling.

The best part-timer is Chris Jericho because when he comes back, he's part of the show week-in, week-out until he's gone or Undertaker with his yearly match-of-the-year candidates.

I don't care about Brock Lesnar and his no-personality, shrieks-like-a-girl, ads-on-his-shorts, stupid-****ing-tattoos doucheosity.

The best thing about Brock Lesnar is Paul Heyman, and that's not a good sign. I don't think there's anything big or noteworthy about beating the **** out of Big Show. One big who cares to me. But hey, I'm alone in that opinion and he's around and making money. I guess that's all that matters.

The entire wrestling universe needs to go away from this part-time **** in general. Be part of the show, make it feel like you're part of the show and not just some side, temporary attraction garbage. It won't because it's making money, but I'm saying the fans need to stop buying into it.

Tell us how you really feel! ;-) Those are all valid points though, so I'll give you that. That being said, I'll always be a fan of Brock Lesnar showing up and causing destruction. I don't think he needs to win the WHC unless he can be there consistently, but he isn't hurting anything in his current role. Other than last night, pretty much every match since his return has been solid (including the possible Match of the Year with Punk in 2013). I'll always have room for a guy like that. I wish he loved the pro wrestling just as much as the next guy, but at least he doesn't half-*** things when he does show up.

[TheMatrix31]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

Heel and face don't apply to indie darlings.

Then why does the question of "why do we even cheer or boo anymore?" even get asked if the indie darlings and their fans don't care about heel or face?

[BDKiiing]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

There has been a lot of talk about "the line" forming behind Orton.

I think Elimination Chamber has Randall defending in the Chamber against "the line" behind him.

I can't see Bryan being a part of that after Bray beat him nor do I see him winning right before Mania.

So I'm thinking "the line" (Not including Batista) is Brock, Bray, Reigns, Punk, Cena (who will find his way in). I may be forgetting someone. Sheamus?

They all battle it out, fans continue to riot that Bryan isn't among the top 5 contenders.

However, book it now, Bryan will be holding the title at the end of Mania 30. Guaranteed.

Maybe having it in his hands, but probably not as champion.

[Bellsprout]

Re: Raw 1/27/14: If you quit watching for awhile, I wouldn't blame you.

I'm just assuming. She keeps showing up at things, and Summer looked upset that Emma showed up on Smackdown. It's only been two weeks, but I think we've hit the ceiling on the 'stand in crowd with sign' bit.

I will murder everything if they change her entrance music.

Well, not everything. Just most things.