Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • reyes the roof
    Hall Of Fame
    • Mar 2009
    • 11526

    #316
    Re: Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

    Originally posted by Majingir
    In terms of MITB...Would anyone mind Cesaro winning the title, holding it for 2 months, to then lose it at Summerslam to Lesnar? Cesaro vs Lesnar with Heyman as ref or something would be great to see. lol, and throughout that whole feud, we have Heyman speaking on behalf of both superstars.
    I don't know if his contract would allow it, but if they could get him to work enough dates, I'd rather see Lesnar get the belt now and build Cesaro up to take the belt from him at Summerslam. Cesaro was the hottest thing in the company next to Bryan up to WrestleMania, but pairing him with Heyman has killed his momentum and I don't think he is ready for the title now. The only guy I could buy as champion right now besides Cena or Orton is Lesnar, or maybe HHH. At the moment, I guess the next guy up would be Reigns just because of how they've been pushing him

    Comment

    • Bard
      YouTube: NHBard
      • Oct 2010
      • 7803

      #317
      Re: Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

      I'll just go over what I remember.


      -Reigns and Ambrose is going to be fun to watch until they split.
      -Mox...erm, Ambrose's promo was pretty solid and that mic spike at the end just so he had to pick it up again was pretty awesome/funny.
      -Reigns was pretty good on the mic, probably second best one he has done.
      - Rollins plays heel well, prefer him as a face but that interview was solid.
      -Tag match was okay, everyone did their part and loved the finish. I think Bray might be walking out of MITB as WWEWHC...
      Come hang with me on YouTube! I stream/make videos on a variety of games from sports, to action, to adventure!


      https://youtube.com/@nhbard?si=kOpLZu8evi-aFsnG

      Comment

      • Chrisksaint
        $$$
        • Apr 2010
        • 19127

        #318
        Re: Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

        I could certainly see Bray with the titles setting up a triple threat at SSlam against Cena and Bryan(if healthy).

        I don't see Lesnar winning a title, just makes no sense unless they can get him to show up for some Raws and PPVs.
        Saints, LSU, Seminoles, Pelicans, Marlins, Lightning

        Comment

        • Reed1417
          MVP
          • May 2012
          • 6120

          #319
          Re: Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

          Originally posted by st0rmb11
          This. There was no reason to have Bray come back so soon. And then have him lose on live TV to a Cena led team?

          They should have let the Family have a month or two to shine and develop/show their characters, and dominate the tag division. Harper was really starting to show his chops as a talker and the guys can put on damn good matches. They should have let them go for a little while without Bray, and build up the anticipation for Bray's return.
          I would also liked to have seen Harper and Rowan just destroy everyone in the tag division and get the titles. Cause now that Bray is back I don't see that happening sadly. I think they (Harper/Rowan) were just starting to come into their own and i would have thought that WWE would try to push them a bit more.
          As far as Lesnar goes, I would like to see the guy do something besides what he's doing now. If he gets the titles and holds on to them until a possible Cesaro feud then great but yeah. He's gotta do something. Unless ya know they use him as another Taker type opponent for Mania but yeah. Heyman keeps reminding us week after week what Lesnar did which is keeping him relevant in a way but I guess that's the point.


          Reed is comin' atcha!!
          Reed is comin' atcha!
          Check out the YouTube channel!
          www.youtube.com/BRonSports

          Reed's WWE 2k23 Universe: Youtube Edition
          https://forums.operationsports.com/f...e-edition.html

          Comment

          • ProfessaPackMan
            Bamma
            • Mar 2008
            • 63852

            #320
            Re: Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

            Originally posted by Chrisksaint
            I could certainly see Bray with the titles setting up a triple threat at SSlam against Cena and Bryan(if healthy).

            I don't see Lesnar winning a title, just makes no sense unless they can get him to show up for some Raws and PPVs.
            I honestly see Batista getting a title shot 1st(after he comes back)before Bray gets one.
            #RespectTheCulture

            Comment

            • Greekcian
              MVP
              • Aug 2012
              • 977

              #321
              Re: Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

              If Bray had beaten Cena I could see him with the belts, but now that he lost I just can't do it.

              We're really in this position again that the only guys capable of carrying the belts are either John Cena or Randy Orton (given HHH is done wrestling for a while because it would make no sense for Randy to have the belts if he isn't even the leading active guy in his faction)
              That's not an insult, THAT is just a fact of life.

              Comment

              • Chrisksaint
                $$$
                • Apr 2010
                • 19127

                #322
                Re: Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

                Forgot about Batista and makes sense eventually, the only problem is how would he get a title shot? He didn't exactly win many matches and quit on HHH.

                Guess many things can change between now and his return.
                Saints, LSU, Seminoles, Pelicans, Marlins, Lightning

                Comment

                • reyes the roof
                  Hall Of Fame
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 11526

                  #323
                  Re: Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

                  One positive note for Cesaro, they seem to have scrapped his "you beat me with a small package" feud

                  Comment

                  • eremiomania
                    Rookie
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 935

                    #324
                    Re: Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

                    You guys remember last year when the tag team division was finally stacked again? Damn.
                    These days I'm less like "Jailhouse Rock" Elvis and more like "dying alone on the toilet" Elvis.

                    Comment

                    • almostbobsaget
                      2014 Dodgeball Champion.
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 2902

                      #325
                      Re: Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

                      Originally posted by reyes the roof
                      One positive note for Cesaro, they seem to have scrapped his "you beat me with a small package" feud
                      Yeah give it another day or two and revisit this statement.
                      Last edited by almostbobsaget; 06-12-2014, 09:24 PM.

                      Comment

                      • ZB9
                        Hall Of Fame
                        • Nov 2004
                        • 18387

                        #326
                        Re: Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

                        Would they use this opportunity to separate the championship belts again?


                        On one hand I can see it, but then they are starting to put more importance on the US and Intercontinental titles now.

                        Comment

                        • SuperBowlNachos
                          All Star
                          • Jul 2004
                          • 10218

                          #327
                          Re: Raw 06/09/14: Why, Seth? WHY?!?!

                          I'd like to see two different people each grab a belt at the same time. Setting up a triple threat with DB to for 1 belt. They would then retire the Heavyweight belt.

                          Comment

                          Working...