Royal Rumble 1/24/16

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IndianBird
    MVP
    • Nov 2004
    • 2909

    #76
    Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

    Originally posted by PeoplesChampGB
    The mans right. Checkmate. My wife and I can't have a wedding day and be celebrating the first anniversary at the same time.

    So you get married 1/1/00.

    What date is your 10th anniversary celebrated? 1/1/11?

    Thats not correct.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I'm a Vince McMahon Guy!

    On, On, On, To Victory!!

    Gamertag: stewgilligan

    Comment

    • PeoplesChampGB
      All Star
      • May 2012
      • 6003

      #77
      Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

      Originally posted by IndianBird
      So you get married 1/1/00.

      What date is your 10th anniversary celebrated? 1/1/11?

      Thats not correct.


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
      I will make a chart for you.

      1/1/00....Married------WM 1
      1/1/01....1 yr ann-----WM 2
      1/1/02....2 yr ann-----WM 3
      1/1/03....3 yr ann-----WM 4
      1/1/04....4 yr ann-----WM 5
      1/1/05....5 yr ann-----WM 6
      1/1/06....6 yr ann-----WM 7
      1/1/07....7 yr ann-----WM 8
      1/1/07....8 yr ann-----WM 9
      1/1/08....9 yr ann-----WM 10

      If WWE claims that WM 25 is the 25th anniversary of Wrestlemania, then we can all agree that Wrestlemania 10 would be the tenth anniversary of Wrestlemania. But by this chart you can clearly see that that statement is not correct. WM 10 is only the 9th.

      That was the point we were trying to make. It seems like you just got confused by the comparisons. :-)
      Last edited by PeoplesChampGB; 01-24-2016, 01:47 PM.
      NFL- Green Bay Packers
      NCAA- Florida State Seminoles
      NHL- Carolina Hurricanes

      Comment

      • IndianBird
        MVP
        • Nov 2004
        • 2909

        #78
        Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

        Originally posted by PeoplesChampGB
        I will make a chart for you.



        1/1/00....Married------WM 1

        1/1/01....1 yr ann-----WM 2

        1/1/02....2 yr ann-----WM 3

        1/1/03....3 yr ann-----WM 4

        1/1/04....4 yr ann-----WM 5

        1/1/05....5 yr ann-----WM 6

        1/1/06....6 yr ann-----WM 7

        1/1/07....7 yr ann-----WM 8

        1/1/07....8 yr ann-----WM 9

        1/1/08....9 yr ann-----WM 10



        If WWE claims that WM 25 is the 25th anniversary of Wrestlemania, then we can all agree that Wrestlemania 10 would be the tenth anniversary of Wrestlemania. But by this chart you can clearly see that that statement is not correct. WM 10 is only the 9th.

        OK

        So then someone who got married 1/1/00 celebrates their 10th wedding anniversary on 1/1/2011?

        It's is correct that the first one of anything is not an anniversary, just like it's not an annual event yet either. But anniversary of any event is the date of the event. So if the first event is in 1984, the 25th anniversary is in 2009.

        I can't believe I'm involved in this discussion. I hate myself for it.


        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
        I'm a Vince McMahon Guy!

        On, On, On, To Victory!!

        Gamertag: stewgilligan

        Comment

        • PeoplesChampGB
          All Star
          • May 2012
          • 6003

          #79
          Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

          Originally posted by IndianBird
          OK

          So then someone who got married 1/1/00 celebrates their 10th wedding anniversary on 1/1/2011?

          It's is correct that the first one of anything is not an anniversary, just like it's not an annual event yet either. But anniversary of any event is the date of the event. So if the first event is in 1984, the 25th anniversary is in 2009.

          I can't believe I'm involved in this discussion. I hate myself for it.


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
          Just leave it as this. You are correct in what you say about marriage dates, and we are correct in what we say about Wrestlemania. It's stupid that WWE says incorrect information like this. Kinda like how everyone thought that 2000 was the first year of the new millennium but the truth is is that 2001 was.
          Last edited by PeoplesChampGB; 01-24-2016, 01:54 PM.
          NFL- Green Bay Packers
          NCAA- Florida State Seminoles
          NHL- Carolina Hurricanes

          Comment

          • EL_GABE
            Have a V8....POWER!
            • Aug 2009
            • 2372

            #80
            Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

            the rumble always gets me pump!!

            cant wait , hopefully its tooo sweeeet!
            Psn:EL_GABE
            Add me =)

            GT: MRDONKEYGRANDE

            Comment

            • Jukeman
              Showtime
              • Aug 2005
              • 10955

              #81
              Royal Rumble 1/24/16

              Reigns will not win. Either Wyatt or a suprise entrance will win (no I don't mean Styles)


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

              Comment

              • EL_GABE
                Have a V8....POWER!
                • Aug 2009
                • 2372

                #82
                Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

                Originally posted by Jukeman
                Reigns will not win. Either Wyatt or a suprise entrance will win (no I don't mean Styles)


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                hacksaw jim duggun
                Psn:EL_GABE
                Add me =)

                GT: MRDONKEYGRANDE

                Comment

                • Jukeman
                  Showtime
                  • Aug 2005
                  • 10955

                  #83
                  Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

                  Originally posted by EL_GABE
                  hacksaw jim duggun

                  No CM Punk!


                  /


                  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                  Comment

                  • PeoplesChampGB
                    All Star
                    • May 2012
                    • 6003

                    #84
                    Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

                    Originally posted by Jukeman
                    No CM Punk!


                    /


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                    Screw that, everyone knows The Shockmaster is winning tonight.
                    NFL- Green Bay Packers
                    NCAA- Florida State Seminoles
                    NHL- Carolina Hurricanes

                    Comment

                    • EL_GABE
                      Have a V8....POWER!
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 2372

                      #85
                      Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

                      curtis axle wins it again! bay bay!!!
                      Psn:EL_GABE
                      Add me =)

                      GT: MRDONKEYGRANDE

                      Comment

                      • PeoplesChampGB
                        All Star
                        • May 2012
                        • 6003

                        #86
                        Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

                        Why do you guys think that WWE made the title be on the line this year?

                        My guess is because there isn't legitimate competition in a singles match but mostly because they are going up against the NFC Title Game as opposed to the Pro Bowl like any other year.
                        NFL- Green Bay Packers
                        NCAA- Florida State Seminoles
                        NHL- Carolina Hurricanes

                        Comment

                        • IndianBird
                          MVP
                          • Nov 2004
                          • 2909

                          #87
                          Royal Rumble 1/24/16

                          Originally posted by PeoplesChampGB
                          Why do you guys think that WWE made the title be on the line this year?



                          My guess is because there isn't legitimate competition in a singles match but mostly because they are going up against the NFC Title Game as opposed to the Pro Bowl like any other year.

                          Could be. The title game will be about over by the time the Rumble match starts though.


                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                          I'm a Vince McMahon Guy!

                          On, On, On, To Victory!!

                          Gamertag: stewgilligan

                          Comment

                          • EL_GABE
                            Have a V8....POWER!
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 2372

                            #88
                            Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

                            well it could be due to the injuries , and ti make the rumble "fresh"
                            Psn:EL_GABE
                            Add me =)

                            GT: MRDONKEYGRANDE

                            Comment

                            • redsox4evur
                              Hall Of Fame
                              • Jul 2013
                              • 18169

                              #89
                              Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

                              Originally posted by EL_GABE
                              well it could be due to the injuries , and ti make the rumble "fresh"
                              Yea I think it's the injuries...and this leads into another thing I have been thinking. The IC title match is going to suck for a last man standing match. This is because they NEED all hands on deck for the Rumble later in the night. And that means Ambrose and Owens are going to have to pull double duty. So you can't have two guys kick the living **** out of each and then an hour or so later come out and enter the Rumble.
                              Follow me on Twitter

                              Comment

                              • EL_GABE
                                Have a V8....POWER!
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 2372

                                #90
                                Re: Royal Rumble 1/24/16

                                Originally posted by redsox4evur
                                Yea I think it's the injuries...and this leads into another thing I have been thinking. The IC title match is going to suck for a last man standing match. This is because they NEED all hands on deck for the Rumble later in the night. And that means Ambrose and Owens are going to have to pull double duty. So you can't have two guys kick the living **** out of each and then an hour or so later come out and enter the Rumble.
                                could be happen

                                with a late number

                                i could see them pulling it off if it starts the show maybe 1 of those 2 guys
                                Psn:EL_GABE
                                Add me =)

                                GT: MRDONKEYGRANDE

                                Comment

                                Working...