Re: Do you agree with this guy? (Regarding SD VS RAW video game)
YES, I DO have a clue. And NO, I will NOT get over it, primarily because I am sick of Christianity's hypocritical attitudes towards sex, birth control, and other issues, and I would like to cut through all this crap and brainwashing. In my studies at school, both in high school and in college, I studied many of the world's religions, including Christianity and Judaism. My assertion is based on the fact that right-wing Christian nutbars (a minority of all of the people) in the US somehow view sex as "impure" and they view it in a negative light, when this is hypocritical because sex is a biological imperative, and the same people who say this don't stop to think that THEY were born as a result of a man and a woman having sex in the first place. I don't think the majority of Americans are like the man who wrote this review.
"Save that for men who like to view porn; not men who want to view what is pure and moral."
This is VERY hypocritical and condescending statement. How is a couple having sex "moral" but the same act(s) displayed on camera "impure" or "immoral"?
I am not here to debate. I am here to give my opinion.
The guy who wrote the review either knows nothing about the WWE (if he did, he would probably not buy this game), or didn't read the box. I do believe that all of the sexual content in the WWE is completely unnecessary because I prefer the old WWF, which was driven by unique characters and storylines. That being said, I would never use a moralizing, hypocritical, condescending, elitist, snobby attitude to justify my opinion like this man did in his review of the game.
"There are pornographic scenes in the season mode. ...This is not a game I can play with my family. In previous WWE games, you had an option to be exposed to this. But in this game you are pretty much forced to view the unwanted porn. It's bad enough that this foolishness is on the actual "RAW" show, but I can't even get away from it in the game. ...Parents, if you care about your children being exposed to porn - by force - do not get this game."
First of all, it's not porn, not even softcore porn. All of his statements about it being "forced porn" are false. Second of all, if you are so offended by it, you are not "forced" to view it, you can skip scenes in Season Mode by pressing the X button.
I don't know why he even bought WWE SmackDown! Vs Raw.
Originally posted by Superstar
"Save that for men who like to view porn; not men who want to view what is pure and moral."
This is VERY hypocritical and condescending statement. How is a couple having sex "moral" but the same act(s) displayed on camera "impure" or "immoral"?
I am not here to debate. I am here to give my opinion.
The guy who wrote the review either knows nothing about the WWE (if he did, he would probably not buy this game), or didn't read the box. I do believe that all of the sexual content in the WWE is completely unnecessary because I prefer the old WWF, which was driven by unique characters and storylines. That being said, I would never use a moralizing, hypocritical, condescending, elitist, snobby attitude to justify my opinion like this man did in his review of the game.
"There are pornographic scenes in the season mode. ...This is not a game I can play with my family. In previous WWE games, you had an option to be exposed to this. But in this game you are pretty much forced to view the unwanted porn. It's bad enough that this foolishness is on the actual "RAW" show, but I can't even get away from it in the game. ...Parents, if you care about your children being exposed to porn - by force - do not get this game."
First of all, it's not porn, not even softcore porn. All of his statements about it being "forced porn" are false. Second of all, if you are so offended by it, you are not "forced" to view it, you can skip scenes in Season Mode by pressing the X button.
I don't know why he even bought WWE SmackDown! Vs Raw.
Comment