OMT, can you answer this?

[stoncold32]

Re: OMT, can you answer this?

Are you kidding me? The players were worse in 08 than in 09

The running animations are 10x's better in '08. Go look at the vids.

Now when players get in the open field, they start this weird hop-jump type of run.

[game382]

Re: OMT, can you answer this?

Because they had to rebuild the engine for next gen blah blah blah

I can't stand how players ice skate in next gen, which is why I still play last gen. I love the last gen engine, it is pretty much perfect, other than some major flaws that you can easily exploit.

This statement at the end is contradictory how can it be near perfect with major flaws? That alone make its no where near perfect it would have to be minor flaws.

[Bigdmo9999]

Re: OMT, can you answer this?

This statement at the end is contradictory how can it be near perfect with major flaws? That alone make its no where near perfect it would have to be minor flaws.

Okay it had no game killing flaws like NCAA 08 did on next gen. All of the different years have had 1 major exploit, like the deep ball or fumbles or dropped passes. That is what I meant. In next gen it had a lot of those things, not to mention weird glitches like the missing center, etc.

[Bigdmo9999]

Re: OMT, can you answer this?

The running animations are 10x's better in '08. Go look at the vids.

Now when players get in the open field, they start this weird hop-jump type of run.

I'm gonna have to disagree with you on this one. I mean unless you mean PS2 08 vs. PS2 09, but in 08 on the PS3 the players all ran with their heads forward, their hips squared, and they ice skated across the field, kind of like in 09 only in 09 they move their heads now.

[canes21]

Re: OMT, can you answer this?

I don't think the "engine" was much different... though the term "engine" gets thrown around way too often.

The reason why the last gen stuff plays better is because it has had 8 years of iteration ironing out the kinks. NCAA 09 was only the 3rd year for this generation.

But NCAA 05 almost played identical to the videos. And it was like its 4th year. And the video is 07, not 09. So it wasn't the 9th year.

[Cdenz]

Re: OMT, can you answer this?

I don't think the "engine" was much different... though the term "engine" gets thrown around way too often.

The reason why the last gen stuff plays better is because it has had 8 years of iteration ironing out the kinks. NCAA 09 was only the 3rd year for this generation.

I have to disagree with you here, I thought NCAA 02 played better(at the time) than NCAA 07. NCAA 02 was the 1st run on the ps2. 2004 has be listed many times as the best of the whole series...question is can NCAA 10 which will be in it's 4th year become the best NCAA football game that has ever been made?

[stoncold32]

Re: OMT, can you answer this?

I have to disagree with you here, I thought NCAA 02 played better(at the time) than NCAA 07. NCAA 02 was the 1st run on the ps2. 2004 has be listed many times as the best of the whole series...question is can NCAA 10 which will be in it's 4th year become the best NCAA football game that has ever been made?

No. It can't be. Because it will still be missing too much of what made it great in the past