IGN Review is up
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: IGN Review is up
Player movement is still awful. That's all I need to know. This game just doesn't look or feel anything like football. Players turn on a dime, they skate all over the field, there's hardly any sense of weight, and momentum is not properly respected. That's why I'm going to sit this year out and hope for the best next year, but I'm afraid the player movement (and player interactions) are going to change very little until the next gen of consoles.
For those of you who can overlook this issue, I honestly envy you.
Playing on slow or very slow helps the skating and the feeling of sense of weight to the players.Comment
-
Re: IGN Review is up
I thought the review is ok with a decent score, it touched on some good points, I just don't think there was a ton of depth to it.
Since I've played 11 to near death, I'm sure I'll notice smaller tweaks and changes just because of the amount of time I've spent with it, so maybe that's why I think that about the review.
Plus it's just one person's opinion, which can be nice to get a feel for the game, but since I was buying the game already, reviews won't have much bearing for me on this purchase.Comment
-
"When Clemson players rub that rock and run down the hill, its the most exciting 25 seconds in college football."
Brent Musberger, ABC SportsComment
-
Re: IGN Review is up
No, it doesn't. Players still don't plant their feet then they turn, they don't lean into their turns, the running animations still look bad, momentum still isn't respected, and players still have that "twitchy" look to them. It does give players a slightly "weightier" feel, I'll give you that, but not by much. The problem is EA's locomotion engine, which looks to have not been touched since last year. I was excited about the locomotion engine last year because I thought it was a stepping stone towards producing more realistic player movements. I didn't realize it was EA's end-all solution to the issue. That's what worries me about the future of the series. The fact that they can look at the current locomotion system and say, "Yeah, that looks really good," makes me seriously question whether they're ever going to be able to make the simulation game I'm looking for.Comment
-
-
Re: IGN Review is up
That was a fair review to me, but then again I don't really take much stock in a game's score on a website or in a mag. I'm much more interested in reading the impressions thread on here or reading impressions from someone who is familiar with football, especially the sport's many nuances.
Some would say it's a edited and slight upgrade from NCAA 11, but that's fine with me. If Oregon plays fast-paced, Navy runs that disciplined triple option, and, etc, then I'm going to be happy with NCAA. Refinements that are done right and help towards making a more complete football game are better than new gimmicks or additions that are meant to cater to the casual gamers or meant to increase the hype for the game. I'd rather take small substantive refinements and features, instead of additions or features which are half-baked.Comment
-
-
Re: IGN Review is up
No matter where you start (coordinator or head coach), you're in charge of recruiting for the entire team.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: IGN Review is up
Not really a fan of the site, but it's a good score based on how they've reviewed the game in the past.
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/118/1181529p1.htmlStreaming PC & PS5 games, join me most nights after 6:00pm ET on TwitchTV https://www.twitch.tv/shaunh20
or Tiktok https://www.tiktok.com/@shaunh741
My YouTube Vids: https://www.youtube.com/@OdoggyDogg/videosComment
-
Comment
-
Re: IGN Review is up
That's what I meant by the review was off. He doesn't know what the heck he's talking about ODogg.Comment
Comment