Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

[moylan1234]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

It's not schtick it's a fact and I'm sorry it's not to your liking

We have already seen the current 2013 rosters in the game. There is a video that shows all the current rosters, being scrolled through on the console itself. We know they are authentic and updated for 2013, as any number of threads complaining about how bad the ratings are can attest to.

Which would seem to support the theory that they're not based on real players which EA has admitted several times. They rate out the rosters as a whole they don't go through individually rating each player in the default roster to attempt to match the real life counterpart. so all those threads complaining about the ratings are basically slamming their own heads into a wall

[Ramminyou]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

It's not schtick it's a fact and I'm sorry it's not to your liking

Don't be obtuse. The rosters are based on real life players.

[Ky3217]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

It's not schtick it's a fact and I'm sorry it's not to your liking
Which would seem to support the theory that they're not based on real players which EA has admitted several times. They rate out the rosters as a whole they don't go through individually rating each player in the default roster to attempt to match the real life counterpart. so all those threads complaining about the ratings are basically slamming their own heads into a wall

I really wish there was a face palm smiley.

Christ dude, man up and admit that you're wrong

[PowerofRed25]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

It's not schtick it's a fact and I'm sorry it's not to your liking

No comment on the actual facts I laid out shooting your theory down? I even granted your naive premise that these are "generic" players and my facts come with evidence, not hyperbole. Please do not be this naive, use your critical thinking skills here. Do you not realize how ridiculous you sound?

[Ky3217]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

No comment on the actual facts I laid out shooting your theory down? I even granted your naive premise that these are "generic" players and my facts come with evidence, not hyperbole. Please do not be this naive, use your critical thinking skills here. Do you not realize how ridiculous you sound?

Im interested in this as well. He can add my facts to those of which he needs to comment on as well

[PowerofRed25]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

Im interested in this as well. He can add my facts to those of which he needs to comment on as well

I guess my concerns with these screenshots are two fold.

1) We know the new rosters are already in the game, we've seen the video of them on the console and presumably they had to be finished for the demo as the rosters in the demo are accurate.

2) Many of the players in these screenshots are not on the rosters that are confirmed to be updated. They just aren't there. Just for Nebraska, there isn't a QB #17, DT #94, LB #4, SS #8. Another very obvious one to me was Kirk Cousins, I mean, "QB #8" at Michigan State They just don't exist on the rosters we KNOW are in the game already.

So the question is, what are these screenshots from and what are they trying to show us? Because what they show me are old rosters, old uniforms and old conference alignments. It is very clear that the screenshots all come from conference and rivalry games, yet teams like Missouri are still playing Big 12 opponents. I am just at a loss of what these screenshots are supposedly showing, because it sure as heck is not what we're getting in July.

[woogie98]

Game looks pretty good. besides the huge Football

[SafetyGreen]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

The more you say they're real players the closer EA gets to a lawsuit. YOU GUYS shut up, we get what you're saying but shut up

[Ky3217]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

The more you say they're real players the closer EA gets to a lawsuit. YOU GUYS shut up, we get what you're saying but shut up

Lol if EA has to deal with a lawsuit, it wont be because of us.

Your worries are extremely unfounded

[kingsofthevalley]

The more you say they're real players the closer EA gets to a lawsuit. YOU GUYS shut up, we get what you're saying but shut up

Thats what I was thinking. Folks in here trying to create evidence. Somebody delete this thread lol.

[olemiss86]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

The more you say they're real players the closer EA gets to a lawsuit. YOU GUYS shut up, we get what you're saying but shut up

[cparrish]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

Moylan, I am with you on this. The pictures they have posted are without the updated rosters, and as Moylan alluded to, it's this way every year. People freak out over the pictures every year about why #17 is still the QB for Something State University but as soon as the game hits the shelves, #17 isn't on Something State's roster.

A great example would be the picture of Nebraska at Iowa where we can clearly see #94,

Spoiler

Jared Crick

, in the pictures. Now people are freaking out to why #94 is still in the game when he was drafted in April, but he is in the game because the game is built separately and then combined at the end for the finished product and rosters are always the last thing to be implemented in the game.

As you can see in this video of Nebraska's players (9:36 of the video), player #94 is nowhere to be found because he isn't on the NCAA 13 roster. These pictures were obviously taken from the game before the 2013 season roster was plugged into the game. It is not that big of a deal, but I know for a fact "new" people will be complaining about this very same thing in June 2013 for NCAA 14.

[Skull]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

and not a single real gameplay photo....

[PowerofRed25]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

The more you say they're real players the closer EA gets to a lawsuit. YOU GUYS shut up, we get what you're saying but shut up

Thats what I was thinking. Folks in here trying to create evidence. Somebody delete this thread lol.

Yes, it is these posts that bring it closer, not the actual lawsuits that have gone nowhere. Please.

[PowerofRed25]

Re: Some More NCAA Football 13 Screenshots

Moylan, I am with you on this. The pictures they have posted are without the updated rosters, and as Moylan alluded to, it's this way every year. People freak out over the pictures every year about why #17 is still the QB for Something State University but as soon as the game hits the shelves, #17 isn't on Something State's roster.

A great example would be the picture of Nebraska at Iowa where we can clearly see #94,

Spoiler

Jared Crick

, in the pictures. Now people are freaking out to why #94 is still in the game when he was drafted in April, but he is in the game because the game is built separately and then combined at the end for the finished product and rosters are always the last thing to be implemented in the game.

As you can see in this video of Nebraska's players (9:36 of the video), player #94 is nowhere to be found because he isn't on the NCAA 13 roster. These pictures were obviously taken from the game before the 2013 season roster was plugged into the game. It is not that big of a deal, but I know for a fact "new" people will be complaining about this very same thing in June 2013 for NCAA 14.

So let me get this right. You just typed up every single point I had already made in this thread, almost verbatim but are using it to argue AGAINST what I am saying?

You and Moylan seem to be glossing over what all of us are saying. We aren't arguing that these screenshots come from a pre-2013 roster build, that is obvious, we are wondering WHY they are from a pre-2013 roster build.

The 2013 default rosters have been definitely updated in the game for at least two weeks. I'm guessing the default rosters have been finalized for over a month. Combining that with the fact that no uniforms have been updated and Missouri and West Virginia are very clearly still in their previous conferences, we are wondering what these screenshots are supposed to be showing.

Of course the rosters will be updated for the retail version. I'm sure the uniforms will as well. That isn't what I'm concerned about. I'm concerned about why these screenshots exist and what they are showing? There is absolutely zero evidence in any of these pictures that they were even taken from NCAA 13. I am not doubting that they were, I am just baffled by what we're supposed to be looking at.

They don't show new gameplay, they don't show menus, they don't show atmosphere or presentation. They don't have updated rosters, they don't have updated uniforms, they don't have updated stadiums and they don't have updated conferences. What they do show is an out of date roster build with no attention to detail in any facet of the game.

I will leave the ridiculous "lawsuit preventing" rosters nonsense for another time, surely you all realize how ridiculous that argument sounds. This thread is about screenshots and I am looking at screenshots that could be NCAA 12 for all I know because they are showing a 100% 2012 version of the game.