Question about CFM stat leaders

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hoosierbengal
    Rookie
    • Mar 2004
    • 439

    #1

    Question about CFM stat leaders

    So I noticed when I look at the league leaders in my Franchise I see my players and where they rank with the rest of the league. However when I look at the sack leaders my players don't show up. The league leader has 6 sacks and I have a player with 5.5 but he is nowhere to be found. Hasn't this been like this for at least the last 3 years? Is that a difficult thing to fix? Not a huge deal in any way just curious why it is still like that?
  • ParaAut
    Rookie
    • Aug 2016
    • 166

    #2
    Re: Question about CFM stat leaders

    The list only contains 500 (?) players - likely a performance issue, so they capped the max number in the list.

    If you select only AFC/NFC then your players should come up. I think the problem is only with Defense as every statistic is in 1 table.

    Comment

    • NimitsTexan
      Banned
      • Mar 2007
      • 806

      #3
      Re: Question about CFM stat leaders

      Originally posted by ParaAut
      The list only contains 500 (?) players - likely a performance issue, so they capped the max number in the list.

      If you select only AFC/NFC then your players should come up. I think the problem is only with Defense as every statistic is in 1 table.
      They filter out sack leaders based on total tackles (sort how long n baseball you have a minimum number at bats to be counted in the average leaders). It is silly they do it that way instead of just filtering out those with the lowest totals.

      Comment

      • hoosierbengal
        Rookie
        • Mar 2004
        • 439

        #4
        Re: Question about CFM stat leaders

        Originally posted by NimitsTexan
        They filter out sack leaders based on total tackles (sort how long n baseball you have a minimum number at bats to be counted in the average leaders). It is silly they do it that way instead of just filtering out those with the lowest totals.
        Thanks fellas. Didn't realized it worked that way.

        Comment

        Working...