Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • m29a
    Rookie
    • Aug 2011
    • 368

    #16
    Re: Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

    I don't think the majority of Madden players care about presentation. I agree they could do better for those that value it, but EA probably has data that shows the amount of people mashing the buttons to get to the gameplay and it'd probably still be the case even if it was hugely improved.

    Comment

    • Unlucky 13
      MVP
      • Apr 2009
      • 1707

      #17
      Re: Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

      Originally posted by Funkycorm
      More presentation models are always a good thing.

      However when it comes to splitting it into 2 games this is where I have an issue even though I am a franchise player. This same topic comes up in other games as well. Make the ultimate team versions and franchise games different.

      But here is the problem... What happens when people play both? I now have to buy 2 games when I used to have to buy just one. What if I like both? Suddenly it is a rip off for me because I have to buy 2 instead of one .

      The splitting games topic honestly has no merit to it whatsoever and should never be an option for the game.

      Don't get me wrong, I definitely think there are needed improvements in franchise but why buy 2 games when I get what I want in one?
      Well, for me its because I'm not getting the experience that I want right now at all. So many like me are grasping at straws, looking for ideas to get something period.
      Anyone who claims to be a fan of two teams in the same pro sport is actually a fan of none.

      Comment

      • Funkycorm
        Cleveland Baseball Guru
        • Nov 2016
        • 3159

        #18
        Re: Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

        Originally posted by Unlucky 13
        Well, for me its because I'm not getting the experience that I want right now at all. So many like me are grasping at straws, looking for ideas to get something period.
        And I agree with this. I would love a more immersed game. Without a doubt. It is what I play most.

        My main point though was that there are plenty that enjoy both, likely a silent majority, who would not like it because they like both. So splitting up would be a bad decision and anger that silent majority that is the big chunk of their sales. EA likely has numbers that say a huge chunk of people play both but this is just a guess on my part.
        Funkycorm

        Currently Playing:

        MLB The Show 25 (PS5)
        Red Dead Redemption 2 (PS4)
        Pokemon Violet (Switch)


        Twitch:

        Twitch


        Dynasties:

        None at the moment

        Comment

        • douevenbench
          Banned
          • Jan 2020
          • 166

          #19
          Re: Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

          They already have a quick presentation mode in MUT...why not let franchise users use this option as well?

          Comment

          • JayhawkerStL
            Banned
            • Apr 2004
            • 3644

            #20
            Re: Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

            Originally posted by Madden08PCgmr
            I'd love to know how the suits view this one.

            How many diehards could they bring back in the fold with a bonafide, robust career/franchise/coach mode?
            Hundreds of them.

            Comment

            • Cato06
              Rookie
              • Sep 2016
              • 288

              #21
              Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

              Originally posted by Madden08PCgmr
              I'd love to know how the suits view this one.

              How many diehards could they bring back in the fold with a bonafide, robust career/franchise/coach mode?
              .


              It would bring back a lot of diehards, but the question I ask myself is how many younger gamers would they attract by improving these aspects of the game? Do they even understand what they are potentially missing? It’s been a really long time since an NFL game had a real authentic NFL presentation experience. A lot of people say they skip the presentation, or broadcast elements, but Madden has never been good at it in the first place. Ever. Everyone skips it, because it’s not good. Even the guys who like presentation skip it. So comparing it to past Maddens is not really a good way to determine if it’s important enough to improve on.

              When I played 2K5 I always, always watched the weekly sports center show at the end of every week. I never got sick of it. It gave you all the scores and current standings, key stats, and also talked about playoff picture, big trades, and college prospects. I literally knew everything about my league without having to dig through menus. If it’s done correctly it adds so much immersion and becomes less “skippable”. I think a lot of die hard madden gamers don’t understand what they are missing and why the always say.... “meh I just skip it”. Madden has always been geared towards a community who only care about button mashing to get to the next play and not appreciate the experience the game could potentially bring to the player.


              Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports
              Last edited by Cato06; 09-14-2020, 08:10 AM.

              Comment

              • lions2k9
                Rookie
                • Sep 2009
                • 314

                #22
                Re: Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

                Originally posted by Cato06
                It would bring back a lot of diehards, but the question I ask myself is how many younger gamers would they attract by improving these aspects of the game? Do they even understand what they are potentially missing? It’s been a really long time since an NFL game had a real authentic NFL presentation experience. A lot of people say they skip the presentation, or broadcast elements, but Madden has never been good at it in the first place. Ever. Everyone skips it, because it’s not good. Even the guys who like presentation skip it. So comparing it to past Maddens is not really a good way to determine if it’s important enough to improve on.

                When I played 2K5 I always, always watched the weekly sports center show at the end of every week. I never got sick of it. It gave you all the scores and current standings, key stats, and also talked about playoff picture, big trades, and college prospects. I literally knew everything about my league without having to dig through menus. If it’s done correctly it adds so much immersion and becomes less “skippable”. I think a lot of die hard madden gamers don’t understand what they are missing and why the always say.... “meh I just skip it”. Madden has always been geared towards a community who only care about button mashing to get to the next play and not appreciate the experience the game could potentially bring to the player.


                Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports
                When I played 2k5 I would watch the halftime and wrap up shows all the time. Simply because it felt like I was watching ESPN. Even when I played the hell out of NBA 2K19, I watched the intro all the time because it was actually immersive. It made me feel like I was watching a real broadcast. Madden has never captured this, they always went their own way. I can respect that on one hand, but it always seems to fall short. After awhile people just skip it because there’s nothing ever worth seeing.. so it’s one of the last things people want added.

                I think if Madden gave us a true broadcast such as Monday night football from ESPN or Thursday night football from NFL Network more people would watch it. They don’t need to have that in exhibition/mut/head to head. Just have it in franchise mode for those who want real immersion into a living league.

                Comment

                • stinkubus
                  MVP
                  • Dec 2011
                  • 1463

                  #23
                  Re: Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

                  Originally posted by m29a
                  I don't think the majority of Madden players care about presentation. I agree they could do better for those that value it, but EA probably has data that shows the amount of people mashing the buttons to get to the gameplay and it'd probably still be the case even if it was hugely improved.
                  There is absolutely nothing they can do that won't get stale very quickly if you put in any kind of volume with this game.

                  Comment

                  • jyod21
                    Rookie
                    • Mar 2014
                    • 371

                    #24
                    Re: Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

                    Originally posted by Funkycorm
                    More presentation models are always a good thing.

                    However when it comes to splitting it into 2 games this is where I have an issue even though I am a franchise player. This same topic comes up in other games as well. Make the ultimate team versions and franchise games different.

                    But here is the problem... What happens when people play both? I now have to buy 2 games when I used to have to buy just one. What if I like both? Suddenly it is a rip off for me because I have to buy 2 instead of one .

                    The splitting games topic honestly has no merit to it whatsoever and should never be an option for the game.

                    Don't get me wrong, I definitely think there are needed improvements in franchise but why buy 2 games when I get what I want in one?
                    MUT would be a FTP game, if they split them, like that, imo. They would follow the COD Warzone model.

                    Comment

                    • stinkubus
                      MVP
                      • Dec 2011
                      • 1463

                      #25
                      Re: Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

                      Why would EA ever make MUT free to play when MUT players are more than happy to fork over $100 for pre order editions just get the game 3 days early plus a small amount of VC?

                      Giving away millions in revenue for no reason at all doesn't sound like a good business model to me.

                      Comment

                      • jyod21
                        Rookie
                        • Mar 2014
                        • 371

                        #26
                        Re: Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

                        Originally posted by stinkubus
                        Why would EA ever make MUT free to play when MUT players are more than happy to fork over $100 for pre order editions just get the game 3 days early plus a small amount of VC?

                        Giving away millions in revenue for no reason at all doesn't sound like a good business model to me.
                        Why would CoD do it? You do it to get more players feet in the door, that aren’t put behind a $60 entrance fee. You make it cross platform, and then make your money on the micro transactions of the millions of additional players you added, that want to be competitive. Activison has claimed almost $2B in revenue, in Q2, doing it, spearheaded by Warzone. They had something like 60 million players. They were making over $3M a day from it! I could easily see Madden following suit.
                        Last edited by jyod21; 09-15-2020, 09:18 AM.

                        Comment

                        • Madden08PCgmr
                          MVP
                          • Feb 2017
                          • 2441

                          #27
                          Re: Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

                          Originally posted by jyod21
                          Why would CoD do it? You do it to get more players feet in the door, that aren’t put behind a $60 entrance fee. You make it cross platform, and then make your money on the micro transactions of the millions of additional players you added, that want to be competitive. Activison has claimed almost $2B in revenue, in Q2, doing it, spearheaded by Warzone. They had something like 60 million players. They were making over $3M a day from it! I could easily see Madden following suit.
                          Its not that hard to MUT for free.

                          Its a grind to get a solid team, but once you figure out the card game, play for free is easy.

                          I do relate to the adults that pay to play. Time is money. I value my time FAR more than I value a buck. If my choice is grind for 100 hours, or pay $100.. its not even a choice for me.

                          I wouldn't care if they made franchise pay to play, so long as they had worthwhile content. If that's what it takes to get them interested, FINE! Do it.
                          You want free speech?
                          Let's see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours.

                          Comment

                          • Dagan
                            Pro
                            • Jun 2020
                            • 623

                            #28
                            Re: Think EA Needs Two Separate Presentation Models

                            After a whole week of patches, yes, we truly need separate games. Every patch is a mixed bag of whatever codes and modes whomever could get to, and they aren't fixes at all because they just highlight or create other glitches.

                            Separate games equals separate modes/codes equals separate teams working on separate patches.
                            (...brought to you by Carl's Jr.)

                            Comment

                            Working...