Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

**RawkerOne** · 09-26-2003, 08:02 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

Who cares about commentary when the gameplay is awesome? I don't.

**RawkerOne** · 09-26-2003, 08:02 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

Who cares about commentary when the gameplay is awesome? I don't.

**RawkerOne** · 09-26-2003, 08:02 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

Who cares about commentary when the gameplay is awesome? I don't.

**Kanobi** · 09-26-2003, 08:10 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
RawkerOne said:
Who cares about commentary when the gameplay is awesome? I don't.

<hr /></blockquote>

lol!

I guess in some ways its better this year with the Challenge and the way peter mentions height and weight and how long players have been in the league. Thats pretty tight.

**Kanobi** · 09-26-2003, 08:10 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
RawkerOne said:
Who cares about commentary when the gameplay is awesome? I don't.

<hr /></blockquote>

lol!

I guess in some ways its better this year with the Challenge and the way peter mentions height and weight and how long players have been in the league. Thats pretty tight.

**Kanobi** · 09-26-2003, 08:10 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
RawkerOne said:
Who cares about commentary when the gameplay is awesome? I don't.

<hr /></blockquote>

lol!

I guess in some ways its better this year with the Challenge and the way peter mentions height and weight and how long players have been in the league. Thats pretty tight.

**RawkerOne** · 09-26-2003, 08:14 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

they are alot more specific, however it's hard to notice sometimes, much like noticing all the different tackle animations. each user has his own pattern to how they play/react and thus the result is seemingly repeatitive announcers/gameplay/results. to prove this point, try watching a full game and try doing things that you normaly wouldn't, it's hard to do because reactions are reactions and are hard to control. it could also be because of the amount of time you spend playing the game, i heard fever has (or was going to have) downloadable commentary.

they are more specific in their association with players, drives (overlays and commentary), and on a teams seasons status because i have heard refrence to my 0-5 start. They also comment about specific players history and season stats.

i think they honestly ran out of time developing the game, it's their excuse for everything i have asked them about on the official forums. i don't hold it against them though, they implimented FPF and even though i don't like it, i respect their innovative development approach to the game. They aren't affraid to take chances on a hunch or idea, and that's why i enjoy supporting them and sega because that is the type of developer they are. I also invested in SEGNY so i'm biased, lol

**RawkerOne** · 09-26-2003, 08:14 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

they are alot more specific, however it's hard to notice sometimes, much like noticing all the different tackle animations. each user has his own pattern to how they play/react and thus the result is seemingly repeatitive announcers/gameplay/results. to prove this point, try watching a full game and try doing things that you normaly wouldn't, it's hard to do because reactions are reactions and are hard to control. it could also be because of the amount of time you spend playing the game, i heard fever has (or was going to have) downloadable commentary.

they are more specific in their association with players, drives (overlays and commentary), and on a teams seasons status because i have heard refrence to my 0-5 start. They also comment about specific players history and season stats.

i think they honestly ran out of time developing the game, it's their excuse for everything i have asked them about on the official forums. i don't hold it against them though, they implimented FPF and even though i don't like it, i respect their innovative development approach to the game. They aren't affraid to take chances on a hunch or idea, and that's why i enjoy supporting them and sega because that is the type of developer they are. I also invested in SEGNY so i'm biased, lol

**RawkerOne** · 09-26-2003, 08:14 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

they are alot more specific, however it's hard to notice sometimes, much like noticing all the different tackle animations. each user has his own pattern to how they play/react and thus the result is seemingly repeatitive announcers/gameplay/results. to prove this point, try watching a full game and try doing things that you normaly wouldn't, it's hard to do because reactions are reactions and are hard to control. it could also be because of the amount of time you spend playing the game, i heard fever has (or was going to have) downloadable commentary.

they are more specific in their association with players, drives (overlays and commentary), and on a teams seasons status because i have heard refrence to my 0-5 start. They also comment about specific players history and season stats.

i think they honestly ran out of time developing the game, it's their excuse for everything i have asked them about on the official forums. i don't hold it against them though, they implimented FPF and even though i don't like it, i respect their innovative development approach to the game. They aren't affraid to take chances on a hunch or idea, and that's why i enjoy supporting them and sega because that is the type of developer they are. I also invested in SEGNY so i'm biased, lol

**Kanobi** · 09-26-2003, 08:22 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
RawkerOne said:
they are alot more specific, however it's hard to notice sometimes, much like noticing all the different tackle animations. each user has his own pattern to how they play/react and thus the result is seemingly repeatitive announcers/gameplay/results. to prove this point, try watching a full game and try doing things that you normaly wouldn't, it's hard to do because reactions are reactions and are hard to control. it could also be because of the amount of time you spend playing the game, i heard fever has (or was going to have) downloadable commentary.

they are more specific in their association with players, drives (overlays and commentary), and on a teams seasons status because i have heard refrence to my 0-5 start. They also comment about specific players history and season stats.

i think they honestly ran out of time developing the game, it's their excuse for everything i have asked them about on the official forums. i don't hold it against them though, they implimented FPF and even though i don't like it, i respect their innovative development approach to the game. They aren't affraid to take chances on a hunch or idea, and that's why i enjoy supporting them and sega because that is the type of developer they are. I also invested in SEGNY so i'm biased, lol

<hr /></blockquote>

Rawk you are so right man. In alot of ways the Commentary is much tighter than last year. Good Post as always, man.

**Kanobi** · 09-26-2003, 08:22 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
RawkerOne said:
they are alot more specific, however it's hard to notice sometimes, much like noticing all the different tackle animations. each user has his own pattern to how they play/react and thus the result is seemingly repeatitive announcers/gameplay/results. to prove this point, try watching a full game and try doing things that you normaly wouldn't, it's hard to do because reactions are reactions and are hard to control. it could also be because of the amount of time you spend playing the game, i heard fever has (or was going to have) downloadable commentary.

they are more specific in their association with players, drives (overlays and commentary), and on a teams seasons status because i have heard refrence to my 0-5 start. They also comment about specific players history and season stats.

i think they honestly ran out of time developing the game, it's their excuse for everything i have asked them about on the official forums. i don't hold it against them though, they implimented FPF and even though i don't like it, i respect their innovative development approach to the game. They aren't affraid to take chances on a hunch or idea, and that's why i enjoy supporting them and sega because that is the type of developer they are. I also invested in SEGNY so i'm biased, lol

<hr /></blockquote>

Rawk you are so right man. In alot of ways the Commentary is much tighter than last year. Good Post as always, man.

**Kanobi** · 09-26-2003, 08:22 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
RawkerOne said:
they are alot more specific, however it's hard to notice sometimes, much like noticing all the different tackle animations. each user has his own pattern to how they play/react and thus the result is seemingly repeatitive announcers/gameplay/results. to prove this point, try watching a full game and try doing things that you normaly wouldn't, it's hard to do because reactions are reactions and are hard to control. it could also be because of the amount of time you spend playing the game, i heard fever has (or was going to have) downloadable commentary.

they are more specific in their association with players, drives (overlays and commentary), and on a teams seasons status because i have heard refrence to my 0-5 start. They also comment about specific players history and season stats.

i think they honestly ran out of time developing the game, it's their excuse for everything i have asked them about on the official forums. i don't hold it against them though, they implimented FPF and even though i don't like it, i respect their innovative development approach to the game. They aren't affraid to take chances on a hunch or idea, and that's why i enjoy supporting them and sega because that is the type of developer they are. I also invested in SEGNY so i'm biased, lol

<hr /></blockquote>

Rawk you are so right man. In alot of ways the Commentary is much tighter than last year. Good Post as always, man.

**kirkangil** · 09-26-2003, 08:29 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

I can agree that they took a step back this year. It would have been better to leave out the pre game intros and put in an player of the game explination. Because imo they are extremely repetitive. Also cant they save some space by just saying some of the lesser name players last name. I dont care about lineman at all they can take calling there saying there names out completely and expand the player audio database. Please get rid of the overload of hispanic names i dont think that many hispanic players ever played in the league that i got in one draft. And if the anouncer cant say the players name then dont put that name on there.

**kirkangil** · 09-26-2003, 08:29 PM

Re: Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

I can agree that they took a step back this year. It would have been better to leave out the pre game intros and put in an player of the game explination. Because imo they are extremely repetitive. Also cant they save some space by just saying some of the lesser name players last name. I dont care about lineman at all they can take calling there saying there names out completely and expand the player audio database. Please get rid of the overload of hispanic names i dont think that many hispanic players ever played in the league that i got in one draft. And if the anouncer cant say the players name then dont put that name on there.

Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

Recommended Videos

Commentary: Better in NFl2k3??

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment