I agree it's a bit different, but mostly because those I mentioned were'nt under contract. Jordan didn't have to demand which team to play for, as he wasn't under contract. Jordan handled his much better, in that he started signing a series of one year deals. BUT, don' think there weren't demands. Also, don't think for a minute that if he were in the same contractual situation that he wouldn't try to leverage a deal to get him somewhere where he wanted to go.
I just personally find the argument that he "held his team hostage" a bit weak (it's fine that we disagree...just discussing here

As I said, retirement is NOT about anyone but you. Yes, your teammates should be a consideration, but a small one. We're talking about a life-changing event. It's no different than a FA weighing his options. The loyalty card is played far too often in the Brett Favre scenario, IMO.
I'm also not saying the Packers made the wrong decision either. They decided to move on when he retired. He chose to change his mind and had to deal with the consequences of being late with the decision. Nobody lost from it, in terms of progress. The only things hurt were PR related for both sides. They found something to do with him, the Packers and Jets both got something in the deal...no biggie.
I also agree that his indecisiveness is frustrating, but I just don't understand the overreaction to him making such a decision. As I said, if he wants to play, and there are teams still willing to take him, I see no issue. I just personally have a hard time faulting a guy for not wanting to hang it up.
As for him staging the retirement, I think it's a perfectly plausible thought. He wanted to play for the Vikings from day one in all this. It's the perfect scenario for him. He'd be on a legit playoff team and in able to try and stick it to the team that he feels "wronged" him.
lol...I honestly don't think the guy would NOT want to win a championship. He's always been competitive (hence the desire to want to get back at his old team in the first place). I don't think he''ll go all out in his two divisional games and then ask to take the rest of the year off...lol.
I don't see why it should bother you if you're a Vikings fan. If the guy is motivated to beat the Packers twice, that's two more important wins in your playoff run.

I could argue that he'll be a better fit for the Vikings because of this. It can serve as extra incentive...what better way to stick it to the Packers than by winning a SB with their rival. Don't see how it's a bad thing at all. I could care less about what specifically motivates my team's players, as long as they are motivated to win.
Comment