Recommended Videos

Collapse

The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JBH3
    Marvel's Finest
    • Jan 2007
    • 13506

    #76
    Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

    Originally posted by dopeboy206
    whoever puts Michael Irvin over Steve Largent is stupid either doesn't know his NFL or is just stupid.
    Largent Career Avg's:
    Rec/gm = 4.0
    Yds/gm = 65.0
    TDs/gm = .50

    Irvin Career Avg's:
    Rec/gm = 4.7
    Yds/gm = 77.6
    TDs/gm = .41

    Irvin avg'd about a catch and a first down over Largent for his career, and Largent had a TD catch which equates to every two games. Whereas Irvin's rate was slightly lower.

    Largent played in two more seasons than Irvin did, and remember that Irvin's career was cut short as a result of a spinal inury at the Vet.

    I mutiplied Irvins career avg's by 32 games (2 full seasons), and had he played the same amount of seasons as Largent based on these career avg's he would've put up 81 more catches & 1,298 more yards rec. He would finish w/ about 20 less TD catches, but he would put out-do Largent in catches and yards rec.

    So if anything these players are virtually the same skill wise. Irvin benefited from playing in Dallas on perhaps one of the best football teams ever whereas Largent enjoyed middling team success on a career that spanned 14 years w/ only 3 entries into the playoffs that finished no deeper than the divisional round.
    Originally posted by Edmund Burke
    All that is needed for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing.

    Comment

    • brayTxiv
      Rookie
      • Jan 2009
      • 84

      #77
      Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

      Jerry Rice The GOAT
      1. Cris Carter
      -the best hands ever
      2. Randy Moss
      -freakishly athletic, not a great possesion reciever
      3. Terrell Owens
      -great deep threat and possesion reciever, crappy hands
      4. Michael Irvin
      -would've had better numbers if not for the great Emmitt
      5. Lance Alworth
      -best old school reciever

      If Moss and TO keep doing their thing they will both jump Carter.

      Comment

      • Fox1994
        Rookie
        • Nov 2008
        • 488

        #78
        Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

        T.O. doesn't have crappy hands. They're just not excellent. You can't be a possession receiver with crappy hands.
        RAIDERS! LAKERS! WARRIORS! A'S! DODGERS! TROJANS!

        Comment

        • freezeframe
          Pro
          • Jul 2005
          • 799

          #79
          Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

          Steve Largent hands down

          Comment

          • steelcurtain311
            Banned
            • Feb 2009
            • 2087

            #80
            Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

            I would say TO's got decent hands. He drops too many balls, but a big reason for that is because he demands so many passes thrown to him. When you get so many balls forced to you, you're going to drop more than the average WR.

            Comment

            • Football4lyfe
              Rookie
              • Sep 2007
              • 346

              #81
              Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

              Randy Moss may be the best combination ever of God given ability and skill combined but he cant be considered best of all time when as a complete WR he still to this day short arms passes across the middle and shies away from contact. He's still top 5-10 but he's not dominating enough in the middle for that 1 spot

              Comment

              • Cebby
                Banned
                • Apr 2005
                • 22327

                #82
                Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

                Originally posted by Football4lyfe
                Randy Moss may be the best combination ever of God given ability and skill combined but he cant be considered best of all time when as a complete WR he still to this day short arms passes across the middle and shies away from contact. He's still top 5-10 but he's not dominating enough in the middle for that 1 spot
                Personally, I'd rather have the best ever at a few things than a "complete" player.

                I'll take a guy who dominates deep than a guy who "dominates the middle"

                Comment

                • brayTxiv
                  Rookie
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 84

                  #83
                  Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

                  Thats the thing with Moss, he is not good at short or intermediate routes, but damn he is the greatest of all time when it comes to the deep ball. It's the deep threat recievers that scares defenses the most though.

                  Fitz would be the ultimate reciever if he had elite speed.

                  Comment

                  • ANDROMADA 1
                    So long to a Legend.
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 5024

                    #84
                    Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

                    Originally posted by brayTxiv
                    Thats the thing with Moss, he is not good at short or intermediate routes, but damn he is the greatest of all time when it comes to the deep ball. It's the deep threat recievers that scares defenses the most though.

                    Fitz would be the ultimate reciever if he had elite speed.
                    Its not that he is not good at short/int routes,he doesnt like to get hit.Also when you have that kind of speed what would be the point?

                    Comment

                    • MattieShoes
                      Rookie
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 489

                      #85
                      Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

                      Originally posted by brayTxiv
                      Thats the thing with Moss, he is not good at short or intermediate routes, but damn he is the greatest of all time when it comes to the deep ball. It's the deep threat recievers that scares defenses the most though.

                      Fitz would be the ultimate reciever if he had elite speed.
                      Funny, in a conversation about the second best WR to make the argument that short timing routes are not scary to defenses. Jerry Rice won 4 rings and set every receiving record known to man primarily by playing short timing routes.

                      Comment

                      • brayTxiv
                        Rookie
                        • Jan 2009
                        • 84

                        #86
                        Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

                        Originally posted by MattieShoes
                        Funny, in a conversation about the second best WR to make the argument that short timing routes are not scary to defenses. Jerry Rice won 4 rings and set every receiving record known to man primarily by playing short timing routes.

                        When did Jerry Rice win another SB ring? From what I can remember he only has 3 rings. I said that deep threat recievers scare defenses the most. That doesn't mean short timing routes arn't effective in the NFL. Jerry was also a very good deep threat. Your a 9ners fan you should know that. Jerry is the GOAT cause he was great at everything.

                        Comment

                        • ANDROMADA 1
                          So long to a Legend.
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 5024

                          #87
                          Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

                          Originally posted by MattieShoes
                          Funny, in a conversation about the second best WR to make the argument that short timing routes are not scary to defenses. Jerry Rice won 3 rings and set every receiving record known to man primarily by playing with John Taylor,Roger Craig,Tom Rathman,Bubba Paris,Bill Walsh,Brent Jones,Ronnie Lott,Steve Young,Joe Cool....etc
                          fixed:wink:
                          Last edited by ANDROMADA 1; 08-18-2009, 02:08 PM.

                          Comment

                          • MattieShoes
                            Rookie
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 489

                            #88
                            Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

                            Originally posted by ANDROMADA 1
                            fixed:wink:
                            My mistake. I knew it was 3, just wasn't thinking about it. :-) He certainly wouldn't have had the same success on a bad team. But lots of players have played on phenomenal teams without putting up Rice type numbers. (including roger craig, dwight clark, john taylor, etc. etc.) He had a rare opportunity and he made the most of it. It's a shame that most receivers never get that chance though. I'm telling you, Joey Galloway coulda been a monster!
                            Last edited by MattieShoes; 08-18-2009, 03:53 PM.

                            Comment

                            • Piderman
                              Banned
                              • Apr 2009
                              • 1953

                              #89
                              Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

                              Gotta go with Rice, he has some rings, i dont think moss has any?
                              But Moss will be in the HOF, with Brady.

                              Comment

                              • PrettyT11
                                MVP
                                • Jul 2008
                                • 3220

                                #90
                                Re: The best WR of all-time not named Jerry Rice?

                                I saw a mention of Sterling Sharpe earlier and I agree that man was a beast and definantly could have been ranked up there if his carer wasn't cut short by injury. I think alot of people have forgotten or just don't remember how good he was. He set and broke alot of recieving records in his time. Only Rice was putting up those kind of numbers during that time.

                                Another guy that had an amazing prime and very great run for a few years is Herman Moore. I don't ever recall his name getting mentioned at all around here. Moore run wasn't on the level of Rice or nothing like that but he put up some damn good numbers during his four year prime before injury. He also broke some recieving records. I have seen alot of people here try to make it seem like Barry was the only player the Lions ever had while he was there and that he was a one man show. Which wasn't the case. I decided to give Herman a lil spotlight.

                                Comment

                                Working...