Wait a minute. You're trying to say the Cowboys weren't the same ol' Cowboys right before Johnson showed up? Sadly mistaken.
You are trying to use Miami as a scapegoat for Dallas' on & off the field ways, which is ignorant and unfair. Same stuff was going on at Valley Ranch.
JJ made them dominant again and with the dominance came more spotlight and exposure. The winning escalated the bad stuff all over again. Jimmy Johnson didn't bring coke and strippers with him. It was already there and in use.
The arguing continues because people like you still shout out the same dumb arguments. Who gives a **** if Miami embraced their swagger? Why does that make Miami college football's Lucifer...even when they don't deserve it (this decade)? Those other programs are no different than Miami just because they didn't show off on the field.
All the stuff with Nebraska. Oklahoma and Nebraska were doing way more off the field than Miami. But they get away with it because their teams had more tradition and a little less black faces (deny all you want...this plays alot into it) on the roster. OU has a SI cover with one of their players handcuffed...yet Miami is the street thug, gangster program. Lawrence Phillips and many more before, during and after him were treating Lincoln like a convict training ground. But no...Miami, because they show off after a touchdown, is the ruin of all that is good.
I'm not sitting here saying Miami was clean. It would be foolish to say so. But they weren't worse than other programs. And some programs trumped Miami by a good margin. Look up Florida's 24 arrests since Meyer came in. Look up Penn State's 46 players that were charged since '02. And people spelled doom for Paterno? Not anymore. They're a powerhouse again...but, at a cost.
Comment