A compelling argument can be made for Jim Brown (as can be made for almost every back listed here), but one thing that really stands out to me is Brown played at 6'2" and 245. The DT/NT of the day played at that weight...today the DL averages 50 lbs more than they did in his day. It speaks to how far ahead of his time he was physically, but he was basically the biggest guy on the field. Was he great? Heck, ya. Would he be as great today as he was then? I'm not so sure.
Best runningback of all time
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Best runningback of all time
A compelling argument can be made for Jim Brown (as can be made for almost every back listed here), but one thing that really stands out to me is Brown played at 6'2" and 245. The DT/NT of the day played at that weight...today the DL averages 50 lbs more than they did in his day. It speaks to how far ahead of his time he was physically, but he was basically the biggest guy on the field. Was he great? Heck, ya. Would he be as great today as he was then? I'm not so sure."People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring." - Rogers Hornsby -
Re: Best runningback of all time
Firstly, that is a terrible ****ing example.
Secondly, Juwan Howard was a good NBA player for a span of 7-8 years, but he fizzled out of his prime quickly and started ring chasing. The bum.
Thirdly, comparing NBA players to football players is as incongruent as you can get. The average NFL runningback's prime career is 3-5 years, if that. Curtis played 10 years at a consistently high level. Enough to net him 4th all-time on the runningback list. His accomplishments dwarf Juwan Howards.
Fourthly, if any comparison to Curtis Martin is even applicable it would be Jason Kidd. Both have/had played at a consistently high level and both quietly have had hall of fame careers. Did you know Jason Kidd is 3rd all time in 3 pointers made?
P.S. Yes, I know kidd can hit 3's. He's played for like 20 years and has a championship to boot.Comment
-
Re: Best runningback of all time
So you don't like the example. Okay. You still get the point which is martin is nOT the best. Howard being good???No Howard the best is the comparison. Martin doesn't dwarf Howard. you would at least have to have a championship since he played sooooooooooooo many years on such a high level. Nobody plays pro sports for longevity. They don't hand out trophys for being better than average and not winning any championships for a running back that some even remotely consider to be the "best"
P.S. Yes, I know kidd can hit 3's. He's played for like 20 years and has a championship to boot.
http://www.pro-football-reference.co...M/MartCu00.htm
Look at his stats. Look at them. Look at where he stands at for his career. 4th All time in rushing and 3rd All time in attempts.
Juwan Howard doesn't even come close. Like I said before, Jason Kidd comes closest as the best comparison, but you can also argue that Jason Kidd fits Emmitt Smith as well because they BOTH have played WAAAAAAY past their primes. Especially when Emmitt joined the Cardinals but let's not remember THAT shall we?
Oh, Jason Kidd's stats btw. http://www.basketball-reference.com/.../kiddja01.html
3rd all time in 3 pointers made. 2nd all time in assists and 2nd all time in steals.
Now, you can persist in not calling Curtis Martin an exceptional back if you want to JUST because he didn't win any championships (Which, quite frankly, is an absolutely absurd measurement for success for any football player, but especially for a runningback. Get that mess out of here) but facts state otherwise.
Oh and here's there career accomplishments side by side to destroy the notion that Juwan Howard was at the same level of Curtis at any point in time. And that comparison is STILL absurd.
http://www.pro-football-reference.co...M/MartCu00.htm
Checkout the latest stats of Juwan Howard. Get info about his position, age, height, weight, draft status, shoots, school and more on Basketball-Reference.com
Yep. Juwan Howard sure is a good comparison to Curtis Martin who never missed more than 8 games in his entire career. Yep, that makes tons of sense. Then, considering how many more runningbacks there have been in the NFL compared to PLAYERS in the NBA? Yep, you're making loads of sense right now.Last edited by DukeC; 07-05-2012, 10:26 AM.Comment
-
Re: Best runningback of all time
And y'all are still trying to define greatness by stats? lol
Greatness isn't what is recorded in the stat sheets, its how many guys look to you to lead them to victory. The first person to clock in and the last one to clock out. He's always ready to go to work. The 'eye test' is actually the main determining factor in greatness IMO. Majority of the folks in the discussion may not think Curtis Martin was one of the greatest backs in history but if you ask diehard Jets' fans you'll get a different answer. We didn't watch him clock in and out every day like they did -- their perception of him will be different.
For example, if we ask most people on this board to give them the next best WR not named Jerry Rice and Terrel Owens name will probably won't be at the top of many lists. His stats are HOF worthy by themselves but the perception to the public is that he's an a--hole, which tarnishes his greatness IMO.
I'm glad that Martin thing has started up some very well researched posts -- good stuff.#WashedGamerComment
-
Re: Best runningback of all time
Emmitt didn't join the Cardinals to break Peyton's record. He broke that record as a Cowboy halfway through the 2002 season. He already had all of his records before he ever played for the Cardinals. He joined the Cardinals because he still wanted to play football.Comment
-
Re: Best runningback of all time
You're right. Thank you for correcting me there. It was an abomination seeing him in Red, hence the overreaction. Still, that was Yuck.Comment
-
Re: Best runningback of all time
And y'all are still trying to define greatness by stats? lol
For example, if we ask most people on this board to give them the next best WR not named Jerry Rice and Terrel Owens name will probably won't be at the top of many lists. His stats are HOF worthy by themselves but the perception to the public is that he's an a--hole, which tarnishes his greatness IMO.
The same thing sorta goes for Martin. First off, I don't think anybody is arguing that he is the best RB of all time, this conversation started because somebody said "he quietly had one of the best careers of any RB" or something like that. Nobody is saying he is the best, but he is one of the best. You cannot argue against the stats. Sure Martin wasn't flashy, he didn't wow you with his moves. But he performed at a consitantly high level for many years and at the end of the day he is in the record books as the 4th all time in rushing yards. That means something, stats do matter.Comment
-
Re: Best runningback of all time
I don't like the example because it's a REALLLY BAD example.
http://www.pro-football-reference.co...M/MartCu00.htm
Look at his stats. Look at them. Look at where he stands at for his career. 4th All time in rushing and 3rd All time in attempts.
Juwan Howard doesn't even come close. Like I said before, Jason Kidd comes closest as the best comparison, but you can also argue that Jason Kidd fits Emmitt Smith as well because they BOTH have played WAAAAAAY past their primes. Especially when Emmitt joined the Cardinals but let's not remember THAT shall we?
Oh, Jason Kidd's stats btw. http://www.basketball-reference.com/.../kiddja01.html
3rd all time in 3 pointers made. 2nd all time in assists and 2nd all time in steals.
Now, you can persist in not calling Curtis Martin an exceptional back if you want to JUST because he didn't win any championships (Which, quite frankly, is an absolutely absurd measurement for success for any football player, but especially for a runningback. Get that mess out of here) but facts state otherwise.
Oh and here's there career accomplishments side by side to destroy the notion that Juwan Howard was at the same level of Curtis at any point in time. And that comparison is STILL absurd.
http://www.pro-football-reference.co...M/MartCu00.htm
Checkout the latest stats of Juwan Howard. Get info about his position, age, height, weight, draft status, shoots, school and more on Basketball-Reference.com
Yep. Juwan Howard sure is a good comparison to Curtis Martin who never missed more than 8 games in his entire career. Yep, that makes tons of sense. Then, considering how many more runningbacks there have been in the NFL compared to PLAYERS in the NBA? Yep, you're making loads of sense right now.
Noted. Don't worry I'm not going to bother reading up all those stats or links, no need to. You disagree, so be it.
thanksComment
-
Re: Best runningback of all time
A compelling argument can be made for Jim Brown (as can be made for almost every back listed here), but one thing that really stands out to me is Brown played at 6'2" and 245. The DT/NT of the day played at that weight...today the DL averages 50 lbs more than they did in his day. It speaks to how far ahead of his time he was physically, but he was basically the biggest guy on the field. Was he great? Heck, ya. Would he be as great today as he was then? I'm not so sure.
So you don't like the example. Okay. You still get the point which is martin is nOT the best. Howard being good???No Howard the best is the comparison. Martin doesn't dwarf Howard. you would at least have to have a championship since he played sooooooooooooo many years on such a high level. Nobody plays pro sports for longevity. They don't hand out trophys for being better than average and not winning any championships for a running back that some even remotely consider to be the "best"
P.S. Yes, I know kidd can hit 3's. He's played for like 20 years and has a championship to boot.Comment
-
Re: Best runningback of all time
Not sure how that can be held against him though. Either we can compare across generations or we can't. If we can, than this is more an explanation for his greatness than a knock on it. I'm sure he wasn't the only guy his size playing in the NFL back then. But he was the only one able to play the RB position the way he did at that size.
It really is just an awful comparison though. Howard's still in the league but he's getting like 5 mins a season. He's an after thought that gets garbage time after the after thoughts. Meanwhile, even when he was relevant he didn't have a role on any team as important as Martin's was. There really is no angle where that example works.
have a good afternoonComment
-
Re: Best runningback of all time
But nobody is saying he is the 4th best running back skill wise, just that statistically he had an amazing career.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Best runningback of all time
I voted Barry Sanders.Support: Indianapolis Colts - LA Lakers - Chelsea FC - Ferrari F1Comment
Comment