Is (Insert Player Here) A Hall of Famer?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TripleCrown9
    Keep the Faith
    • May 2010
    • 23714

    #331
    Re: Is (Insert Player Here) A Hall of Famer?

    Originally posted by Godgers12
    No way Owens gets in 1st ballot, he's made far too many enemies for that to happen, not to mention his reputation as a team killer and a "Me first" player.
    Oh please. This isn't the Baseball Hall of Fame. The PFHoF doesn't care about enemies off the field or being a "me first" player. Hell, they won't even take people out after they've been inducted because all they focus on is on-field production.
    Spoiler


    And the bold can also be said about Randy Moss.
    Boston Red Sox
    1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
    9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34

    Comment

    • 55
      Banned
      • Mar 2006
      • 20857

      #332
      Re: Is (Insert Player Here) A Hall of Famer?

      Andre Reed shouldn't even have gotten in at all.

      Comment

      • TripleCrown9
        Keep the Faith
        • May 2010
        • 23714

        #333
        Re: Is (Insert Player Here) A Hall of Famer?

        Also, now that I've actually opened my spoiler, I realized the first picture isn't there. I also included Michael Irvin.
        Boston Red Sox
        1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
        9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34

        Comment

        • rangerrick012
          All Star
          • Jan 2010
          • 6201

          #334
          Re: Is (Insert Player Here) A Hall of Famer?

          Irvin and Carter both had to wait ridiculously longer than their resumes required them to. Part of that was their off the field transgressions. I think the same will apply for T.O.
          Twitter: @rangerrick012

          PSN: dsavbeast

          Comment

          • bringbacksimfootball
            Banned
            • Jan 2015
            • 203

            #335
            Re: Is (Insert Player Here) A Hall of Famer?

            Originally posted by 55
            Andre Reed shouldn't even have gotten in at all.
            That's outrageous. Like mind-blowing outrageous.

            The fact he had to wait so long was criminal. There is a good reason why fans and eventually media personnel began speaking on the travesty of him not being selected; people saw him play and witnessed what he did on that field. Nobody was tougher in the middle, nobody ran the slant better. His longevity is noteworthy as well. And the thing is, he put up excellent numbers while playing in an offense that centered around Thurman Thomas. He retired in what? Like the top 2-3 WR's of all time in numbers?

            Man, I don't know what's happening these days, but it's like everybody is revising the careers of great players to be garbage all of a sudden.

            Comment

            • bringbacksimfootball
              Banned
              • Jan 2015
              • 203

              #336
              Re: Is (Insert Player Here) A Hall of Famer?

              Originally posted by rangerrick012
              Irvin and Carter both had to wait ridiculously longer than their resumes required them to. Part of that was their off the field transgressions. I think the same will apply for T.O.
              Carter waited 5 ballots. Irvin only waited for 2. Both were injustices. Just like Art Monk having to wait as long as he did (7 ballots!)

              Just like with Andre Reed, campaigning from fans and media started for Monk and eventually he got his just due.

              Comment

              Working...