NHL 2K10: Need Player Ratings?

[pf8363]

Re: NHL 2K10: Need Player Ratings?

buffalo sabres

thomas vanek
derek roy
jason pominville
tim connoly
nathan gerbe
tim kennedy
chris butler
ryan miller

thanks!

[Dalsanto0026]

Re: NHL 2K10: Need Player Ratings?

Thanks for these TCrouch.

New Jersey

Patrick Elias
Martin Brodeur
Zac Parise
Jamie Langenbrunner

[Mastro18]

when will you do this for nhl 10?

[VeNOM2099]

Don't know if these were asked yet:

Daniel Alfredsson
Jason Spezza
Pascal Leclaire
Andrew Cogliano (OVR & SPEED)
Dustin Penner
Ales Hemsky (AGILITY & CREATIVITY)

[KrossRoad]

That's cool. So their ratings are based on the type of player they are?

Or is that just their overall rating and then their classification?

Yeah, the player type has a major impact on the rating of the player. Take a 90 OVR Scorer and make him a Utility player, he'll more than likely wind up much lower (in some instances this won't be true as Ovechkin has the player traits to make a good Utility player [high Aggressiveness and Checking]).

I will say one thing about 2k ratings; they do an amazing job at that. Can't wait for this bad boy!

[Scottdau]

Re: NHL 2K10: Need Player Ratings?

Yeah, the player type has a major impact on the rating of the player. Take a 90 OVR Scorer and make him a Utility player, he'll more than likely wind up much lower (in some instances this won't be true as Ovechkin has the player traits to make a good Utility player [high Aggressiveness and Checking]).

If you are the ratings guy. You really do a good job.

[phillyfan23]

Re: NHL 2K10: Need Player Ratings?

wow!! richards and carter rated higher than zetterberg???....

richards could equal zetterberg this year, but no way in holy hell should carter be ranked above zetterberg. Carter is a scorer plays decent defense , simple player. Zetterberg does everything, great passer, stickhandler, can score, great backchecker.

this is what my edited rosters would look like :

Richards- 91
Carter 90
Zetterberg - 93

[Money99]

Re: NHL 2K10: Need Player Ratings?

wow!! richards and carter rated higher than zetterberg???....

richards could equal zetterberg this year, but no way in holy hell should carter be ranked above zetterberg. Carter is a scorer plays decent defense , simple player. Zetterberg does everything, great passer, stickhandler, can score, great backchecker.

this is what my edited rosters would look like :

Richards- 91
Carter 90
Zetterberg - 93

I wonder if Zetterberg's injury-prone back might have had something to do with it?
I'm not that upset by that though. Zetterberg is still rated high and I'm sure his defensive ratings are spot on, so it's all good.

[phillyfan23]

Re: NHL 2K10: Need Player Ratings?

I wonder if Zetterberg's injury-prone back might have had something to do with it?
I'm not that upset by that though. Zetterberg is still rated high and I'm sure his defensive ratings are spot on, so it's all good.

ya could be, but you still give zetterberg the benefit of the doubt. This guy is easily my favorite player outside of the flyers. plays the game right way. No crying , no whining , just gets the job done.

I guess that's why we have the edit a player feature.

[VeNOM2099]

As KrossRoad said, don't be worrying too much about what a player's overal rating is. What will count much more down the line are his CORE abilities (what makes Zetterberg play like Zetterberg). Also, as he explains it, his player type affects the attribute skew. So a player like say, Kovalev who's a finess player will have his overall much more affected by having his pass attribute raised than say, his shot power attribute.

Likely, Zetterberg's DURABILITY attribute contributed to his low overall, but that doesn't mean he's going to necessarily be a worse player than either Carter or Richards. This isn't EA's game here where his overal means he's the best in the game or the worst.

I'm pretty sure when you get the game and play with Zetterberg, you'll notice you won't have to change his attributes after all.

[phillyfan23]

Re: NHL 2K10: Need Player Ratings?

^^^

I don't understand the reasoning behind having player types affecting player ratings. Just makes it confusing for the user.....

could be effective and accurate for the gameplay and sim stats ( and that's all that matters actually) but it is confusing.

When I see a 93 overall vs 92 overall I will think the 93 is the better player, I don't want to think in my head...oh the 93 player is the scoring type while the 92 is the well rounded type. Since this affects this and that affects that....the 92 is better.

Hopefully, the better player is going to have the better overall rating next year.

by the way, I hope we get a thread by the title:

"Need Gameplay videos on higher difficulty settings where sliders are changed for a sim game???? "

[VeNOM2099]

Re: NHL 2K10: Need Player Ratings?

^^^

I don't understand the reasoning behind having player types affecting player ratings. Just makes it confusing for the user.....

could be effective and accurate for the gameplay and sim stats ( and that's all that matters actually) but it is confusing.

When I see a 93 overall vs 92 overall I will think the 93 is the better player, I don't want to think in my head...oh the 93 player is the scoring type while the 92 is the well rounded type. Since this affects this and that affects that....the 92 is better.

Hopefully, the better player is going to have the better overall rating next year.

by the way, I hope we get a thread by the title:

"Need Gameplay videos on higher difficulty settings where sliders are changed for a sim game???? "

Well, let me put it this way then: who's the greatest player of all time? Now think about WHAT it is that makes (or made) him great. Now, if you were to assign a "rating" to him, what would it be and how would it compare to other players (past and present) who were also great, but maybe for different reasons.

Also, is he a forward or a defenseman? Do you see what I mean... In the past, games made the ratings "simple" because that's what people's expectation were of a game. Forwards were always in the 90. Defensemen where in the 80. Scrubs were between 70 and 60.

But a player's worth is much more "complex" than simply numbers given for a particular "skill set". Case in point, Crosby, Malkin and Ovechkin are going to be the highest rated forwards in the game. In EA's game, what's going to set them appart? Judging by their "OVR" rating, there probably isn't going to be much of a difference between either (heck, there's hardly any difference as it is between some 4th line scrub or a 1st line sniper - you can deke out players and the goalies easily with both). But in 2K's game, each player will have their core differences: Ovechkin is going to be a scoring machine, Malkin is going to be a playmaker extraordinaire and Crosby will be the one that's more "balanced", giving each player their specific uses (you won't be able to use one player like you do the other), just as they do in real life.

It's more complicated, yes, but that's because it's complicated in real life. With luck, if the rating system works as intended, you won't have to worry about the numbers. All you'll have to worry about is how you play with each player. The game will take care of the rest.

[Lets-Go-Caps]

Washington Capitals and Calgary Flames players.

[Aidanmac22]

I know this is a long time ago but what about Steve begin