It seemed to me (from the limited amount of times I saw them this year) the Canucks were in a sort of lull most of the time. Maybe similar to the haze the Wings were in after losing Game 7 to the Penguins? They just seemed to lack that extra burst and fire that they had last year.
The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
It seemed to me (from the limited amount of times I saw them this year) the Canucks were in a sort of lull most of the time. Maybe similar to the haze the Wings were in after losing Game 7 to the Penguins? They just seemed to lack that extra burst and fire that they had last year. -
Re: The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
Everything I've heard (from someone I know in the local media and a prominent former Canuck) suggests that Vigneault didn't want to go into the playoffs with Hodgson. Gillis hinting otherwise was spin control. I'm sure Hodgson would've like more playing time, but who demands to be dealt from a Cup contender immediately before the trade deadline as opposed to waiting for the offseason? Nobody.Originally posted by Thrash13Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.Originally posted by slickdtcDrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.Originally posted by Kipnis22yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your postComment
-
Last edited by DrJones; 04-22-2012, 10:31 PM.Originally posted by Thrash13Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.Originally posted by slickdtcDrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.Originally posted by Kipnis22yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your postComment
-
Comment
-
Re: The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
It seemed to me (from the limited amount of times I saw them this year) the Canucks were in a sort of lull most of the time. Maybe similar to the haze the Wings were in after losing Game 7 to the Penguins? They just seemed to lack that extra burst and fire that they had last year.
It'll be interesting to see what happens this summer. They're still loaded, but could really use a couple pieces and the cap room of Luongo's contract off the books.Comment
-
Re: The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
I don't think many did. Although, Dr. Jones was pretty unimpressed by the deal. I wonder if they could have instead gone after Derek Roy for a slightly higher price.Comment
-
Re: The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
It's also highly unlikely the Canucks could move Luongo without taking a big contract in return. If it's Tampa, for example, I'm guessing the Canucks take Ryan Malone in return (3 years left at 4.5M) with picks going both ways.Originally posted by Thrash13Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.Originally posted by slickdtcDrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.Originally posted by Kipnis22yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your postComment
-
Re: The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
, so why not offer Hodgson, Raymond, and a pick for Ott and Souray, for example? Kassian might have better long-term value, but Ott was a much-better fit for a win-now team that needed some top-9 grit and scoring pop.
Originally posted by Thrash13Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.Originally posted by slickdtcDrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.Originally posted by Kipnis22yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your postComment
-
Re: The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
It seemed to me (from the limited amount of times I saw them this year) the Canucks were in a sort of lull most of the time. Maybe similar to the haze the Wings were in after losing Game 7 to the Penguins? They just seemed to lack that extra burst and fire that they had last year.
Better they lose now than in the 2nd or 3rd round, I suppose. Longer offseason, more impetus for change in attitude.Originally posted by Thrash13Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.Originally posted by slickdtcDrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.Originally posted by Kipnis22yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your postComment
-
Re: The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
Although it may be for the best, trading Luongo will not offer cap relief to Vancouver. While Luongo's contract length is ludicrous, the actual cap hit of 5.3M is not. If Schneider is re-signed as a starter, he's looking at Halak money at a bare minimum: 4-5 years at 3.5-4M.
It's also highly unlikely the Canucks could move Luongo without taking a big contract in return. If it's Tampa, for example, I'm guessing the Canucks take Ryan Malone in return (3 years left at 4.5M) with picks going both ways.
EDIT: And you're right. Roy wouldn't have been realistic. But heck, if they were looking for someone to deal with Lucic this year they should have just offered up Mason Raymond and a first for Paul Gaustad and a spare part. Would have beaten Nashville's offer I'd guess.Last edited by bad_philanthropy; 04-22-2012, 11:06 PM.Comment
-
Re: The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
As I said before, LA was more gritty. I think hard work was the difference, because talent-wise, Vancouver was better.My YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/gosjsharks14Comment
-
Re: The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
At least with Malone you might get some on-ice value, and he might even be moveable before then end of his contract. Seems like cap relief in the sense that Malone could be slightly useful for a while and also free up that that 5 million before the window on the Sedins et al closes.
EDIT: And you're right. Roy wouldn't have been realistic. But heck, if they were looking for someone to deal with Lucic this year they should have just offered up Mason Raymond and a first for Paul Gaustad and a spare part. Would have beaten Nashville's offer I'd guess.Originally posted by Thrash13Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.Originally posted by slickdtcDrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.Originally posted by Kipnis22yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your postComment
-
Re: The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
Luongo is staying(bittersweet) and Schneids is leaving....
Anyways, the one thing that pops out at me is that the Canucks had trouble scoring and Cody Hodgson, their scoring center, was traded at the deadline for Zack Kassian. I don't get it, Coho was unreal and could have been a huge help for the Canucks but they go out and get a guy who was a healthy in Game 5. I know Coho was unhappy but it doesn't matter use him up until he wants out. Mike Gillis could almost certainly blame himself for this.
Back to the series, nice goaltending and D throughout. I would have called the final play on Hammer a trip/hook but oh well what can you do with bad officiating in all playoff series.Comment
-
Re: The Official 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
I would have called that final play holding the stick...My YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/gosjsharks14Comment
Comment