gameinformer

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • feedmeccc
    Pro
    • Feb 2003
    • 573

    #1

    gameinformer

    LINKS GOT RATED A 7
    TIGER WOODS GOT RATED A 9.5
  • jmarks2001
    Rookie
    • Jul 2003
    • 252

    #2
    Re: gameinformer

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    feedmeccc said:
    LINKS GOT RATED A 7
    TIGER WOODS GOT RATED A 9.5

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
    Yeah, I saw that too. It's the first less than stellar review/preview for Links 2004 that I've seen. But it does make me a little bit worried because I'm looking forward to Links more than any other game this year.

    Comment

    • jmarks2001
      Rookie
      • Jul 2003
      • 252

      #3
      Re: gameinformer

      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      feedmeccc said:
      LINKS GOT RATED A 7
      TIGER WOODS GOT RATED A 9.5

      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
      Yeah, I saw that too. It's the first less than stellar review/preview for Links 2004 that I've seen. But it does make me a little bit worried because I'm looking forward to Links more than any other game this year.

      Comment

      • jmarks2001
        Rookie
        • Jul 2003
        • 252

        #4
        Re: gameinformer

        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        feedmeccc said:
        LINKS GOT RATED A 7
        TIGER WOODS GOT RATED A 9.5

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
        Yeah, I saw that too. It's the first less than stellar review/preview for Links 2004 that I've seen. But it does make me a little bit worried because I'm looking forward to Links more than any other game this year.

        Comment

        • wawasman
          P*ng
          • Mar 2003
          • 1531

          #5
          Re: gameinformer

          based on what though? maybe a little more info here?

          if its because of bells and whistles i can easily see that, but i would think those looking forward to Links are doing so because of the "realism" of golfing gameplay, not to dress for pimping ....dont get me wrong, i LOVE TW, but i am also going to get Links, it sounds really good to me

          Comment

          • wawasman
            P*ng
            • Mar 2003
            • 1531

            #6
            Re: gameinformer

            based on what though? maybe a little more info here?

            if its because of bells and whistles i can easily see that, but i would think those looking forward to Links are doing so because of the "realism" of golfing gameplay, not to dress for pimping ....dont get me wrong, i LOVE TW, but i am also going to get Links, it sounds really good to me

            Comment

            • wawasman
              P*ng
              • Mar 2003
              • 1531

              #7
              Re: gameinformer

              based on what though? maybe a little more info here?

              if its because of bells and whistles i can easily see that, but i would think those looking forward to Links are doing so because of the "realism" of golfing gameplay, not to dress for pimping ....dont get me wrong, i LOVE TW, but i am also going to get Links, it sounds really good to me

              Comment

              • jmarks2001
                Rookie
                • Jul 2003
                • 252

                #8
                Re: gameinformer

                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                slugox said:
                based on what though? maybe a little more info here?

                if its because of bells and whistles i can easily see that, but i would think those looking forward to Links are doing so because of the "realism" of golfing gameplay, not to dress for pimping ....dont get me wrong, i LOVE TW, but i am also going to get Links, it sounds really good to me

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
                Yeah, I think the features of TW2004 are pretty cool. I guess if you could mix the features of TW with the online capability, sweet graphics, and solid gameplay (as reported in previews) of Links, you would have one sweet golf game.

                Comment

                • jmarks2001
                  Rookie
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 252

                  #9
                  Re: gameinformer

                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  slugox said:
                  based on what though? maybe a little more info here?

                  if its because of bells and whistles i can easily see that, but i would think those looking forward to Links are doing so because of the "realism" of golfing gameplay, not to dress for pimping ....dont get me wrong, i LOVE TW, but i am also going to get Links, it sounds really good to me

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
                  Yeah, I think the features of TW2004 are pretty cool. I guess if you could mix the features of TW with the online capability, sweet graphics, and solid gameplay (as reported in previews) of Links, you would have one sweet golf game.

                  Comment

                  • jmarks2001
                    Rookie
                    • Jul 2003
                    • 252

                    #10
                    Re: gameinformer

                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    slugox said:
                    based on what though? maybe a little more info here?

                    if its because of bells and whistles i can easily see that, but i would think those looking forward to Links are doing so because of the "realism" of golfing gameplay, not to dress for pimping ....dont get me wrong, i LOVE TW, but i am also going to get Links, it sounds really good to me

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
                    Yeah, I think the features of TW2004 are pretty cool. I guess if you could mix the features of TW with the online capability, sweet graphics, and solid gameplay (as reported in previews) of Links, you would have one sweet golf game.

                    Comment

                    Working...