Re: Setups for Nascar Thunder 2003?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
NASCAR Heat 2002 is a far superior game to NASCAR Thunder 2003 on the Xbox. Yes, it doesn't have every driver or every track, but the setup options and driving model is light years ahead of Thunder. And it does have 43 cars on track, unlike the PS2 version of Heat.
Thunder's driving model is a joke. You can drive around six cars in one turn at Daytona or Talladega on the outside without a drafting partner.
Yeah, right.
Take care,
PK
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
PK,
I agree with you, bro. Heat 2002 was/is an awesome game. I forgot just how good. I've been playing it all morning and having a blast. Like you said, its roster might not be just right and it's slightly outdated, but I think graphically it's almost as good as Thunder 2003 and the car just handles a ton better even using default setups. I love this game, but I am looking forward to the new Papyrus game tomorrow.
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
NASCAR Heat 2002 is a far superior game to NASCAR Thunder 2003 on the Xbox. Yes, it doesn't have every driver or every track, but the setup options and driving model is light years ahead of Thunder. And it does have 43 cars on track, unlike the PS2 version of Heat.
Thunder's driving model is a joke. You can drive around six cars in one turn at Daytona or Talladega on the outside without a drafting partner.
Yeah, right.
Take care,
PK
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
PK,
I agree with you, bro. Heat 2002 was/is an awesome game. I forgot just how good. I've been playing it all morning and having a blast. Like you said, its roster might not be just right and it's slightly outdated, but I think graphically it's almost as good as Thunder 2003 and the car just handles a ton better even using default setups. I love this game, but I am looking forward to the new Papyrus game tomorrow.
Comment