2006 OS Babe Showdown *Game 40*

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • servom999
    Rookie
    • Feb 2003
    • 190

    #16
    Re: 2006 OS Babe Showdown *Game 40*

    Heigl

    Comment

    • sven
      Banned
      • Jul 2002
      • 6021

      #17
      Re: 2006 OS Babe Showdown *Game 40*

      Go Dr Model!

      Comment

      • SPTO
        binging
        • Feb 2003
        • 68046

        #18
        Re: 2006 OS Babe Showdown *Game 40*

        I went with Hayek.

        Close matchup so far.
        Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

        "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

        Comment

        • sven
          Banned
          • Jul 2002
          • 6021

          #19
          Re: 2006 OS Babe Showdown *Game 40*

          Have I mentioned how much I love Dr Model?










          Comment

          • videobastard
            MVP
            • Aug 2004
            • 3388

            #20
            Re: 2006 OS Babe Showdown *Game 40*

            Salma Hayek

            Comment

            • TheMatrix31
              RF
              • Jul 2002
              • 52908

              #21
              Re: 2006 OS Babe Showdown *Game 40*

              How this is only a 11 vote lead for Salma Hayek is beyond me.

              Comment

              • GAMEC0CK2002
                Stayin Alive
                • Aug 2002
                • 10384

                #22
                Re: 2006 OS Babe Showdown *Game 40*

                Salma any and every day of the week.
                And was she smokin hot in HD for the Oscars.

                Comment

                • sven
                  Banned
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 6021

                  #23
                  Re: 2006 OS Babe Showdown *Game 40*

                  Originally posted by TheMatrix31
                  How this is only a 11 vote lead for Salma Hayek is beyond me.

                  Because this is 2006 not 1996.

                  Comment

                  Working...