In general I would agree with you. However this case did have some interesting circumstances. For example, the girl that the prosecutors contended was getting boned by R. Kelly in the video claimed that it wasn't her. There was also some doubt circulating about the actual video - if the man in it was R. Kelly. Now I haven't seen the video but I've heard that it looks a lot like R. Kelly. But the jurors have to be certain beyond all reasonable doubt that it is him to convict.
Did he probably do it? Yeah. But that's not the burden of proof that we have.

Comment