The Beatles 2.0?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bd007h
    Banned
    • Sep 2011
    • 501

    #1

    The Beatles 2.0?

    Paul's son James wants to start a new band with the sons of George, John, and Ringo.

    Nothing may be sacred after all: Sir Paul McCartney's son James is interested in starting a second-generation Beatles band with John Lennon's son Sean, George Harrison's son Dhani and Ringo Starr's son Zak.

    The band would apparently be called "The Beatles -- The Next Generation," AFP reports.

    There's only one problem: they're out one drummer. Ringo's son Zak Starkey was not a fan of the idea. "I don't think it's something Zak wants to do," McCartney admitted, according to The Telegraph.


    I dunno how I feel about this
  • SPTO
    binging
    • Feb 2003
    • 68046

    #2
    Re: The Beatles 2.0?

    I don't know how talented they are but it really seems like living off the family name. I guess i'd have to hear them first to really form an opinion.
    Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

    "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

    Comment

    • SuperBowlNachos
      All Star
      • Jul 2004
      • 10218

      #3
      Re: The Beatles 2.0?

      I thought nsync was.

      Comment

      • TheMatrix31
        RF
        • Jul 2002
        • 52908

        #4
        Re: The Beatles 2.0?

        Talk about a gimmick.

        Comment

        • Blaxican8504
          All Star
          • Jul 2002
          • 4150

          #5
          Re: The Beatles 2.0?

          That sure would be trippy.

          Comment

          • dickey1331
            Everyday is Faceurary!
            • Sep 2009
            • 14285

            #6
            Has something like this ever happen before?


            Do you really care where I sent this from?
            MLB: Texas Rangers
            Soccer: FC Dallas, Fleetwood Town
            NCAA: SMU, UTA
            NFL: Dallas Cowboys
            NHL: Dallas Stars
            NBA: Dallas Mavericks

            I own a band check it out

            Comment

            • pittsburgher86
              Rookie
              • Jun 2010
              • 279

              #7
              Re: The Beatles 2.0?

              As a huge Beatles fan, this sounds rather awesome. At the same time it could go really badly. Something I'm definitely interested in following.
              MLB: Pittsburgh Pirates, Boston Red Sox
              NFL: Pittsburgh Steelers, Seattle Seahawks
              NHL: Pittsburgh Penguins, St. Louis Blues
              NBA: Oklahoma City Thunder, Golden State Warriors
              College Sports: Pittsburgh Panthers, Penn State Nittany Lions

              Comment

              • 55
                Banned
                • Mar 2006
                • 20857

                #8
                Re: The Beatles 2.0?

                Everyone knows Julian is much more deserving of his father's legacy than Sean.

                Comment

                • cavsfan2
                  MVP
                  • Aug 2010
                  • 3902

                  #9
                  Re: The Beatles 2.0?

                  Lame
                  10 char

                  Comment

                  • savoie2006
                    R.I.P 2KHockey 2000-2011
                    • Sep 2006
                    • 4657

                    #10
                    Re: The Beatles 2.0?

                    Well I could see it being a big success IF the talent is there.
                    http://rateyourmusic.com/collection/Savoie12/visual/

                    Comment

                    • daflyboys
                      Banned
                      • May 2003
                      • 18238

                      #11
                      Re: The Beatles 2.0?

                      I've never seen adult pictures of McCartney's kid. That is an eerie similarity (as is Harrison's), but it's looking like a bit late in the game.

                      Comment

                      • Molarmite
                        MVP
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 1869

                        #12
                        Re: The Beatles 2.0?

                        Originally posted by olliethebum85
                        I thought nsync was.
                        What?

                        10char
                        Follow me for live wrestling tweets @molarmite

                        Comment

                        • sven
                          Banned
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 6021

                          #13
                          Re: The Beatles 2.0?

                          The Beatles are as overrated as a band can be. I have no desire to hear their kids.

                          Comment

                          • 55
                            Banned
                            • Mar 2006
                            • 20857

                            #14
                            Re: The Beatles 2.0?

                            Originally posted by sven
                            The Beatles are as overrated as a band can be.

                            Comment

                            • Watson
                              Burrow Club
                              • Jul 2008
                              • 27013

                              #15
                              Re: The Beatles 2.0?

                              Because riding coattails worked out for Ziggy Marley.
                              And may thy spirit live in us, Forever LSU

                              @AdamdotH

                              Comment

                              Working...