Lets look at some previous Scorsese movies (according to never wrong Wikipedia):
- The Aviator: budget of 148M adjusted for inflation, made 288M afi.
- Hugo: budget of 183M afi, made 212M afi.
- The Wolf of Wall Street: budget of 110M afi, made 433M afi.
- Silence: budget (40-50M), made 23M.
- The Irishman budget (160M).
Like Blzer alluded to, usually these budget figures do not include the marketing budget which can run up to 100M.
160M is lot of money, unless it is one of those big tent poles films the only director, that quickly comes to mind, that consistently gets that kind of budget is Christopher Nolan and his movies always turn a hefty profit.
So I guess I don't blame the studios? But at the same time, Scorsese has never been about profit, but about prestige.
Much respect to Netflix for putting their money up and they will (probably) get their prestige when The Irishman gets nominated for 10 Oscars or whatever. They will also (probably) claim that the movie was a hit regarding keeping/bringing in new subscribers but that's murkier since we don't get to look closely at those numbers.
I'm just glad this movie got made, Marty is 77 but looks older so I just try to enjoy each film as if is the last one.
Comment