G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

[kennytomson]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

I guess you didn't know GOW isn't a FPS

your right. what do you call COD, GRAW, GOW if they are in deed the same genre...shooters? or is Gears a TPS? whatever the case i've been spoiled by gears. i hope future companies copy alot from that game, i'd love to see an SOCOM gears, WWII, SWAT, somthing a little more based in reality than shooting monsters from another planet that randomly pop up from the ground.

[chippered]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

The first shooter I owned on the 360 was GRAW, well actually it was the demo, but you know. I loved it, and held out on any others until GOW dropped. Loved Gears, but went back to the GRAW demo last night, and it was like old times. I love Gears, but GRAW is still my favorite. Tried the RB6 multiplayer demo, but didnt care at all for it. Also tried Lost Planet or whatever its called. That sucked, IMO.

I do think all shooters in the future will employ some sort of cover feature, but whether its as robust as Gears remains to be seen. I honestly think we'll see something even better out of the next year as far as shooter go.

[HungryBologna]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

If you really want 10 kills in a row, go play one of those ranked matches.

The children out there are terrible.

So true. I decided to give a ranked game a shot (not sure how/what the difference is from a player match) but my team went out and died within the 1st couple minutes, if that. So that left me vs 5 others.

These kids were just plain awful, they didn't use any frags/flashes, had horrible aim, didn't use any cover, horrible reaction times and I was able to pretty much walk right behind them and kill them.

It seems like it's going to be easy to get those achievements for the ranked games.

[TheGamingChef]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

I honestly think we'll see something even better out of the next year as far as shooter go.

Agreed. Halo 3 anyone...?

[Ice Cream Truck]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

I got a question.

How do you expect to "cover" on a first-person shooter such as Halo, Resistance, or Call of Duty?

I've always loved third-persons shooters over first person. But I have to say, you can't knock Call of Duty or Resistance for not allowing you to do stuff you do in Gears. Because your view would just throw you off horribly.

Halo 3 might put out something epic. They might think outside the box and create a cover system that works. But until then.. you're not gonna see that kind of stuff in first person shooters.

[CaptainZombie]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

I got a question.

How do you expect to "cover" on a first-person shooter such as Halo, Resistance, or Call of Duty?

I've always loved third-persons shooters over first person. But I have to say, you can't knock Call of Duty or Resistance for not allowing you to do stuff you do in Gears. Because your view would just throw you off horribly.

Halo 3 might put out something epic. They might think outside the box and create a cover system that works. But until then.. you're not gonna see that kind of stuff in first person shooters.

I don't find it a knock at all, just stating that it would be really cool if FPS's would implement something like this. Perfect Dark Zero had a cover system.

[SLAYER]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

I agree with the original sentiment of this thread. After Gears, every shooter from here on out, FPS or otherwise, needs to step it up. Call of Duty 3 became very boring after running through Gears of War in SP, co-op, and MP.

[DickDalewood]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

I got a question.

How do you expect to "cover" on a first-person shooter such as Halo, Resistance, or Call of Duty?

I've always loved third-persons shooters over first person. But I have to say, you can't knock Call of Duty or Resistance for not allowing you to do stuff you do in Gears. Because your view would just throw you off horribly.

Halo 3 might put out something epic. They might think outside the box and create a cover system that works. But until then.. you're not gonna see that kind of stuff in first person shooters.

Play Rainbow Six and you'll find your answer to how you cover in a first person shooter...

[Klocker]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

I got a question.

How do you expect to "cover" on a first-person shooter such as Halo, Resistance, or Call of Duty?

check it out... it's on 360 now and coming to PS3 in a month or two.

http://rainbowsixgame.uk.ubi.com/vegas/

edit: beaten

[Quick6]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

I prefer the RB6 cover system over GOW.

RB6 is a far better game in MY opinion. GoW graphics aren't what everybody else makes them out to be either, I mean they are great but they aren't that far over RB6. I don't like GoW's cover system compared to RB6 either, but to each his own.

[JayBee74]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

GoW graphics aren't what everybody else makes them out to be either, I mean they are great but they aren't that far over RB6.

You must be using a low def TV, because GOW's graphics are stunning.

[Quick6]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

You must be using a low def TV, because GOW's graphics are stunning.

No I'm using a HD tv, but to me it looks average unless you're not moving or in a cutscene. That motion blur or whatever is just sickening to me. (It literally makes me feel sick). In motion it's not as great as everyone thinks. But hey it's just my opinion.

[Jistic]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

You must be using a low def TV, because GOW's graphics are stunning.

I like R6 cover system better and online better.

But GOW graphics SMOKE R6. It is frickin georgeous.

[Pappy Knuckles]

Re: G.O.W. has ruined FPS for me...

i feel you guys. i've ran through GOW and have been playing Rainbow religiously. I don't even really feel like playing Call of Duty 3 anymore lol.