Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

[Marino]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

No one is on right now to play, I will jump on in like 20 minutes though and try again to see if people are on.

[Scott]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

I'll get on in about an hr

[skitch]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

Still, all the sniper rifles with a scope on them are exactly the same in damage and range, no matter what the weapon select screen says. The only thing different about the different sniper rifle are rate of fire and look/iron sights.

Weapon stats for those who are interested: http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/7...5372202dv4.png

Very cool chart, man. Good find.

[Moses Shuttlesworth]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

Whenever I'm on it's too early for you west coast guys. Then when you guys are on, it's too late for me.

[allBthere]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

Still, all the sniper rifles with a scope on them are exactly the same in damage and range, no matter what the weapon select screen says. The only thing different about the different sniper rifle are rate of fire and look/iron sights.

Weapon stats for those who are interested: http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/7...5372202dv4.png

they said the same thing about the snipers in cod4, but it's simply not true in practice. I think they are all the same until the distance is increased. w/o stopping power the m40a3 was a kill with a hit the the center of the chest while the m21 wasn't at distance. Those stats don't add up to the experience...I snipe 90% of the time, so it's not placeabo(sp?) There is some degree of performance variation at distance imo. I'm sure it's the same way in this game too.

[DakkoN]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

they said the same thing about the snipers in cod4, but it's simply not true in practice. I think they are all the same until the distance is increased. w/o stopping power the m40a3 was a kill with a hit the the center of the chest while the m21 wasn't at distance. Those stats don't add up to the experience...I snipe 90% of the time, so it's not placeabo(sp?) There is some degree of performance variation at distance imo. I'm sure it's the same way in this game too.

The data from COD4's PC version didn't say the same thing, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from. The charts that I seen showed that all the snipers were different.

These numbers were taken from the code from the PC version of the game. It's all true. If you don't one shot them in the chest, then you either a) hit them in the arm instead of the chest, or b) they had juggernaut on. Also, obviously you're not going to one shot through last stand either, it will put them down and then it will take another shot to kill them. The M1 Garand has the same damage as the snipers also, but has weaker modifiers. But all the numbers in that chart and the COD4 charts were crunched from the PC version's coding and it's hard to imagine that they would lie. It's not numerical error.

[allBthere]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

The data from COD4's PC version didn't say the same thing, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from. The charts that I seen showed that all the snipers were different.

These numbers were taken from the code from the PC version of the game. It's all true. If you don't one shot them in the chest, then you either a) hit them in the arm instead of the chest, or b) they had juggernaut on. Also, obviously you're not going to one shot through last stand either, it will put them down and then it will take another shot to kill them. The M1 Garand has the same damage as the snipers also, but has weaker modifiers. But all the numbers in that chart and the COD4 charts were crunched from the PC version's coding and it's hard to imagine that they would lie. It's not numerical error.

they were the same...I think it was even posted on these forums. I can say for sure that the chart for the 360 version of cod4 said they were all the same, but they were not in practice - One thing I can think of is that possibly the accuracy causes a chest shot to register as an arm shot?

My sniper set up does not have stopping power in cod5, and I can say that picking up the final sniper from a dead guy, it felt more effective than the springfield ...but I haven't logged the hours yet to say anything definitive. I have however played something like a total of 11 days on cod4, so I'm confident in my observations regardless of what these charts say. BTW those charts go to 50meter distance....are we to assume the same numbers at 100m or 200m?

I'm not trying to argue the cod5 comment, but the same thing was said for cod4 and it simply isn't true, which is obvious if you played it as much as I have.

[Moses Shuttlesworth]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

I'm gonna get on in a few minutes if anyone is interested.

[grismosw]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

Anyone gonna be on 360 tonight? I have an APF game at 10 then I'll be on after that.

[headrulz101]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

Awesome. My tag is Idolized1 and I know there are a few other guys that are great to get online with.

Thanks for the reply. I'll probably be on later tonight and I'll be sure to send you a Friend Invite. I stink though!

[Marino]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

I am jumping online right now.

[GSW]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

me too

[DTX3]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

I got some free time right now, ill hop on.

[GSW]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

i suck so bad.

[baumy300]

Re: Call of Duty 5: World at War (PS3/360)

Thanks for the reply. I'll probably be on later tonight and I'll be sure to send you a Friend Invite. I stink though!

Yeah, send me an invite and I'll try to get on in about 2 hours from this post.

I can't promise anything, but it's worth a shot.