Rocksteady's Next Title

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DieHardYankee26
    BING BONG
    • Feb 2008
    • 10178

    #16
    Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

    If there has to be another Arkham game I'd rather WB Montreal (the Origins team) get another crack at it while Rocksteady moves on to something else.

    Also Batman Beyond or GTFO.
    Last edited by DieHardYankee26; 10-05-2018, 04:36 PM.
    Originally posted by G Perico
    If I ain't got it, then I gotta take it
    I can't hide who I am, baby I'm a gangster
    In the Rolls Royce, steppin' on a mink rug
    The clique just a gang of bosses that linked up

    Comment

    • Smallville102001
      All Star
      • Mar 2015
      • 6542

      #17
      Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

      Originally posted by TheShizNo1
      IDC about logic.

      Sent from my SM-G950U using Operation Sports mobile app
      Just sounds like you are stuck on Joker than even though batman has a lot of other villains and story's.

      Comment

      • TheShizNo1
        Asst 2 the Comm Manager
        • Mar 2007
        • 26341

        #18
        Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

        Originally posted by Smallville102001
        Just sounds like you are stuck on Joker than even though batman has a lot of other villains and story's.
        Um. Duh?

        Sent from my SM-G950U using Operation Sports mobile app
        Originally posted by Mo
        Just once I'd like to be the one they call a jerk off.
        Originally posted by Mo
        You underestimate my laziness
        Originally posted by Mo
        **** ya


        ...

        Comment

        • peter42O
          MVP
          • May 2018
          • 1991

          #19
          Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

          Joker is awesome but he's DEAD. Arkham Knight was a disappointment for so many reasons including Joker being in the game. Easily prefer to see Rocksteady move on as they're too good to become a single IP factory.

          Honestly, screw Batman and Superman.....I agree with the guy who said TMNT!!!!. Hell yeah!!! Now that would be awesome from Rocksteady.

          Comment

          • Fresh Tendrils
            Strike Hard and Fade Away
            • Jul 2002
            • 36131

            #20
            Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

            The Joker was one of the best things about Arkham Knight.



            Comment

            • TripleCrown9
              Keep the Faith
              • May 2010
              • 23696

              #21
              Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

              Originally posted by peter42O
              Joker is awesome but he's DEAD. Arkham Knight was a disappointment for so many reasons including Joker being in the game. Easily prefer to see Rocksteady move on as they're too good to become a single IP factory.

              Honestly, screw Batman and Superman.....I agree with the guy who said TMNT!!!!. Hell yeah!!! Now that would be awesome from Rocksteady.
              Hi, I'd like to introduce you to comic books.
              Boston Red Sox
              1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
              9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34

              Comment

              • peter42O
                MVP
                • May 2018
                • 1991

                #22
                Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

                Don't have any interest in the comics. In the Arkham series, Joker is dead, period. If Rocksteady keeps bringing him back, then why kill him in the first place? Makes no sense.

                Regarding Arkham Knight, Joker was the second negative about the game behind the crappy Batmobile tank combat where you strafe and it feels like an arena battle. The reason I didn't like it is because even dead, the Joker overshadowed all the other characters to where again, what's the point in having other characters when Joker is still the focal point.

                Personally, the series should have ended with Arkham City as the game was great. Arkham Knight was a disappointing 8.0/10 for me. Still great but I was expecting at least a 9+. Asylum is easily better and City remains the best. If it wasn't for the visuals and gameplay (excluding the Batmobile tank battles), Knight would have been a 7.0/10 at best for me. Just don't see what others see in the game but to each their own.

                Back to now though, I would prefer it if WB would let Rocksteady develop a new IP based on another DC character.

                Comment

                • TripleCrown9
                  Keep the Faith
                  • May 2010
                  • 23696

                  #23
                  Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

                  Technically speaking, I think Batman is dead too. At least in one of the endings he is.
                  Boston Red Sox
                  1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
                  9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34

                  Comment

                  • TheShizNo1
                    Asst 2 the Comm Manager
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 26341

                    #24
                    Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

                    Originally posted by peter42O
                    Don't have any interest in the comics. In the Arkham series, Joker is dead, period. If Rocksteady keeps bringing him back, then why kill him in the first place? Makes no sense.

                    Regarding Arkham Knight, Joker was the second negative about the game behind the crappy Batmobile tank combat where you strafe and it feels like an arena battle. The reason I didn't like it is because even dead, the Joker overshadowed all the other characters to where again, what's the point in having other characters when Joker is still the focal point.

                    Personally, the series should have ended with Arkham City as the game was great. Arkham Knight was a disappointing 8.0/10 for me. Still great but I was expecting at least a 9+. Asylum is easily better and City remains the best. If it wasn't for the visuals and gameplay (excluding the Batmobile tank battles), Knight would have been a 7.0/10 at best for me. Just don't see what others see in the game but to each their own.

                    Back to now though, I would prefer it if WB would let Rocksteady develop a new IP based on another DC character.
                    I wish I could ban you for this blasphemous rambling of Joker.

                    Sent from my SM-G950U using Operation Sports mobile app
                    Originally posted by Mo
                    Just once I'd like to be the one they call a jerk off.
                    Originally posted by Mo
                    You underestimate my laziness
                    Originally posted by Mo
                    **** ya


                    ...

                    Comment

                    • Fresh Tendrils
                      Strike Hard and Fade Away
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 36131

                      #25
                      Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

                      So basically it's I don't like the Joker because he was better than all the other characters?



                      Comment

                      • peter42O
                        MVP
                        • May 2018
                        • 1991

                        #26
                        Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

                        Joker is awesome, my favorite villain in Batman but im talking game wise, he's dead. What would they do? He's in Bruce's head again? He gets resurrected or some crap? None of it makes any sense. Besides, it's a no-win situation if Rocksteady is actually making another Arkham game. If Joker is in the game, it's going to be some weird crap that makes no sense and if he's not, people will be pissed off due to wanting him in the game.

                        DC has so many characters and new IP's that they could actually have Rocksteady create and develop but yet, instead we'll get stuck with another Arkham game? Meh.

                        Comment

                        • Fresh Tendrils
                          Strike Hard and Fade Away
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 36131

                          #27
                          Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

                          Originally posted by peter42O
                          Joker is awesome, my favorite villain in Batman but im talking game wise, he's dead. What would they do? He's in Bruce's head again? He gets resurrected or some crap? None of it makes any sense. Besides, it's a no-win situation if Rocksteady is actually making another Arkham game. If Joker is in the game, it's going to be some weird crap that makes no sense and if he's not, people will be pissed off due to wanting him in the game.

                          DC has so many characters and new IP's that they could actually have Rocksteady create and develop but yet, instead we'll get stuck with another Arkham game? Meh.
                          The Joker being dead is part of the theme of the game considering you have 1) a character return from being dead many years and 2) Another character's death being "faked." So the idea of The Joker haunting Batman is a really nice cover and highlights Batman's own crumbling state of mind. I was thankful for this because I thought the Scarecrow as an ineffectual primary antagonist.

                          The best thing about these games (including Origins) was Joker and his relationship to Batman. Despite the stupid Titan Joker boss fight they really nailed Joker down. I just wish the rest of the characters had gotten the same treatment.



                          Comment

                          • TheShizNo1
                            Asst 2 the Comm Manager
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 26341

                            #28
                            Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

                            I thought they did a good job with Penguin too. But overall, I agree with everything you said.
                            Originally posted by Mo
                            Just once I'd like to be the one they call a jerk off.
                            Originally posted by Mo
                            You underestimate my laziness
                            Originally posted by Mo
                            **** ya


                            ...

                            Comment

                            • peter42O
                              MVP
                              • May 2018
                              • 1991

                              #29
                              Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

                              Originally posted by Fresh Tendrils
                              The Joker being dead is part of the theme of the game considering you have 1) a character return from being dead many years and 2) Another character's death being "faked." So the idea of The Joker haunting Batman is a really nice cover and highlights Batman's own crumbling state of mind. I was thankful for this because I thought the Scarecrow as an ineffectual primary antagonist.

                              The best thing about these games (including Origins) was Joker and his relationship to Batman. Despite the stupid Titan Joker boss fight they really nailed Joker down. I just wish the rest of the characters had gotten the same treatment.
                              Scarecrow was ineffective DUE to the Joker being in the game at all. How can any other antagonist shine when they're in the shadow of the Joker to begin with and when you add him in the game in any way, the antagonist gets even more overshadowed.

                              Other characters will never ever get the same treatment until the focus is no longer on the Joker. If/when Rocksteady develops an Arkham game that doesn't even mention the Joker, all the other characters will just be filler which is why I don't want any more Arkham games. All the other characters will be seen as "meh" because the vast majority of gamers obviously want the Joker.

                              All remains to be seen. If it's a new Arkham game, I'll look into it but im really hoping that it's not another Arkham game.

                              Comment

                              • TheShizNo1
                                Asst 2 the Comm Manager
                                • Mar 2007
                                • 26341

                                #30
                                Re: Rocksteady's Next Title

                                Originally posted by peter42O
                                Scarecrow was ineffective DUE to the Joker being in the game at all. How can any other antagonist shine when they're in the shadow of the Joker to begin with and when you add him in the game in any way, the antagonist gets even more overshadowed.

                                Other characters will never ever get the same treatment until the focus is no longer on the Joker. If/when Rocksteady develops an Arkham game that doesn't even mention the Joker, all the other characters will just be filler which is why I don't want any more Arkham games. All the other characters will be seen as "meh" because the vast majority of gamers obviously want the Joker.

                                All remains to be seen. If it's a new Arkham game, I'll look into it but im really hoping that it's not another Arkham game.
                                Stoooooooopt it. Like, stop. One, literally, had nothing to do with the other. If Scarecrow sucked because of any character it would be Arkham Knight, but even that isn't the case. Scarecrow just sucked. He wasn't present. Arkham Asylum did him a great justice; Arkham Knight just didn't.
                                Originally posted by Mo
                                Just once I'd like to be the one they call a jerk off.
                                Originally posted by Mo
                                You underestimate my laziness
                                Originally posted by Mo
                                **** ya


                                ...

                                Comment

                                Working...