Research topics for JFK assasination

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vince
    Bow for Bau
    • Aug 2002
    • 26017

    #1

    Research topics for JFK assasination

    Help...I'm stuck.

    If you have any suggestions on events or people(basically anything 1960's related) PLEASE don't be shy.
    @ me or dap me

    http://twitter.com/52isthemike
  • bravosfan
    All Star
    • Jul 2002
    • 5184

    #2
    Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

    Warren Commission

    Comment

    • ballerzinc
      T*mpl* *wls
      • Feb 2004
      • 1831

      #3
      Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

      Castro Conspiracy

      Comment

      • Karlos05
        -
        • Mar 2003
        • 5814

        #4
        Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

        Single/Magic Bullet Theory

        Comment

        • USF11
          C*rr*ntly *n L*f* T*lt
          • Jun 2003
          • 4245

          #5
          Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

          Originally posted by Vinceanity2k3
          Help...I'm stuck.

          If you have any suggestions on events or people(basically anything 1960's related) PLEASE don't be shy.
          http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...v=glance&n=130

          This is a by far the best account with factual and scientific backing on the JFK assassination you will ever see. It was a 20/20 special that aired a couple months before peter jennings died. Strongly Suggested.
          "Good music transcends all physical limits, it's more then something you hear, it's something that you feel, when the author, experience, and passion is real" - Murs (And this is for)

          Comment

          • Vince
            Bow for Bau
            • Aug 2002
            • 26017

            #6
            Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

            This ish is complicated. I'm gonna stick with it, but I'm having trouble understanding. I know this isn't a good forum to post this stuff, but even today, I don't get all this crap about recoils, heads moving backwards or frontwards, shots in the rear and whatnot...
            @ me or dap me

            http://twitter.com/52isthemike

            Comment

            • USF11
              C*rr*ntly *n L*f* T*lt
              • Jun 2003
              • 4245

              #7
              Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

              Originally posted by Vinceanity2k3
              This ish is complicated. I'm gonna stick with it, but I'm having trouble understanding. I know this isn't a good forum to post this stuff, but even today, I don't get all this crap about recoils, heads moving backwards or frontwards, shots in the rear and whatnot...
              Buy or rent that DVD and the project will be a breeze. Trust me.
              "Good music transcends all physical limits, it's more then something you hear, it's something that you feel, when the author, experience, and passion is real" - Murs (And this is for)

              Comment

              • throwmonkey
                Sideshow Bob!
                • Jul 2003
                • 750

                #8
                Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

                JFK, ASSASSINATION, JOHN, KENNEDY, KENNEDY ASSASSINATION, JFK ASSASSINATION, CONSPIRACY, THEORY, ASSASINATION, JFK ASSASINATION, MEDICAL, Judyth Baker, Judyth Vary Baker, evidence, Jim Garrison, Lee, Oswald, James, Files, Dealey Plaza, Single, Magic, Bullet, Jack, Ruby, CIA, FBI, NEWSGROUP, ARRB, Assassination Records, Board, MARK LANE, SINGLE BULLET THEORY

                Resources on the John F. Kennedy assassination, the Warren Commission, Lee Harvey Oswald, the Jim Garrison investigation in New Orleans, Oliver Stone's conspiracy movie JFK, and Nigel Turner's The Men Who Killed Kennedy.

                Comment

                • GBrushTWood
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 1624

                  #9
                  Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

                  I hope you aren't researching this subject for school, because finding non-bias sources when it comes to JFK's assassination is almost IMPOSSIBLE at this point. FWIW, I think the Jennings piece (I actually watched this when it first aired) is pretty credible, and gives off the last 'tinfoil hat' type of vibe. That's just me though.

                  I initially wanted to believe in multiple shooters and/or Oswald being involved with others, but there just isn't enough evidence FOR this. Because of occam's razor, I believe that Oswald acted alone. The one that I can't understand is the uncanny deaths of so many people even remotely tied to the case.

                  Comment

                  • USF11
                    C*rr*ntly *n L*f* T*lt
                    • Jun 2003
                    • 4245

                    #10
                    Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

                    Originally posted by GBrushTWood
                    I hope you aren't researching this subject for school, because finding non-bias sources when it comes to JFK's assassination is almost IMPOSSIBLE at this point. FWIW, I think the Jennings piece (I actually watched this when it first aired) is pretty credible, and gives off the last 'tinfoil hat' type of vibe. That's just me though.

                    I initially wanted to believe in multiple shooters and/or Oswald being involved with others, but there just isn't enough evidence FOR this. Because of occam's razor, I believe that Oswald acted alone. The one that I can't understand is the uncanny deaths of so many people even remotely tied to the case.
                    Thats why I think the jennings piece is the best place to start. The piece was fair and backed up info with scientific evidence.
                    "Good music transcends all physical limits, it's more then something you hear, it's something that you feel, when the author, experience, and passion is real" - Murs (And this is for)

                    Comment

                    • GBrushTWood
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 1624

                      #11
                      Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

                      Originally posted by USF11
                      Thats why I think the jennings piece is the best place to start. The piece was fair and backed up info with scientific evidence.
                      Conspiracy theorists would say otherwise. They'd say the Jennings piece relied too much on Posner, who is the single most pro-Oswald-alone guy around.

                      Comment

                      • Vince
                        Bow for Bau
                        • Aug 2002
                        • 26017

                        #12
                        Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

                        Originally posted by GBrushTWood
                        I hope you aren't researching this subject for school, because finding non-bias sources when it comes to JFK's assassination is almost IMPOSSIBLE at this point. FWIW, I think the Jennings piece (I actually watched this when it first aired) is pretty credible, and gives off the last 'tinfoil hat' type of vibe. That's just me though.

                        I initially wanted to believe in multiple shooters and/or Oswald being involved with others, but there just isn't enough evidence FOR this. Because of occam's razor, I believe that Oswald acted alone. The one that I can't understand is the uncanny deaths of so many people even remotely tied to the case.
                        I am way over my head with this crap. I already gavce my proposal and I'm supposed to give my preliminary Bibliographical sources tomorrow morning. There is NOTHING of relevant or credible substance on the research Databases that I'm using.

                        I'm screwed. I knew I should've never chose this as my topic.
                        @ me or dap me

                        http://twitter.com/52isthemike

                        Comment

                        • GBrushTWood
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 1624

                          #13
                          Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

                          Originally posted by Vinceanity2k3
                          I am way over my head with this crap. I already gavce my proposal and I'm supposed to give my preliminary Bibliographical sources tomorrow morning. There is NOTHING of relevant or credible substance on the research Databases that I'm using.

                          I'm screwed. I knew I should've never chose this as my topic.
                          LOL..I'm pretty much in the same position as you with a research paper I have to write for a class as well (though it is technology related). The key to success here: perform some major league bull****ting.

                          Maybe you can focus on one aspect of the JFK assassination, like the entire Jim Garrison saga? Maybe research his motives for bringing those sham charges against Clay Shaw? Not sure what kind of original conclusion you could use with that though. It's something interesting IMO, and you could waste some time watching the Oliver Stone JFK movie. Maybe debunk the JFK movie as a paper?

                          Just don't use WikiPedia.org on your citation page.

                          Comment

                          • Motown
                            OS Brew Connoisseur
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 9169

                            #14
                            Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

                            Originally posted by GBrushTWood
                            I hope you aren't researching this subject for school, because finding non-bias sources when it comes to JFK's assassination is almost IMPOSSIBLE at this point. FWIW, I think the Jennings piece (I actually watched this when it first aired) is pretty credible, and gives off the last 'tinfoil hat' type of vibe. That's just me though.

                            I initially wanted to believe in multiple shooters and/or Oswald being involved with others, but there just isn't enough evidence FOR this. Because of occam's razor, I believe that Oswald acted alone. The one that I can't understand is the uncanny deaths of so many people even remotely tied to the case.
                            It's ABSOLUTELY INSANE to believe Oswald acted alone...how in the hell do get off 6 shots within the allotted time w/ a piece of $hit Mannlicher-Carcano rifle,BOLT ACTION,w/4 POWER scope...if you'll LISTEN to the shots fired...you'll here...bam bam...bam bam bam bam THAT fast...there's NO WAY this rifle could have fired those shots...that fast...unless it was automatic!
                            An EXPERT marksman tried getting off three shots in the allotted time with the actual model of gun that was used in the assassination, and despite being an expert marksman, he COULD NOT do it.

                            Plus...there were too many eye witnesses stated they heard shots & seen smoke from the grassy knoll area...and Ruby Killed the canary, that was gettin' ready to sing.

                            That was a SAD day...to this day

                            Comment

                            • GBrushTWood
                              Banned
                              • Mar 2003
                              • 1624

                              #15
                              Re: Research topics for JFK assasination

                              Originally posted by Motown
                              It's ABSOLUTELY INSANE to believe Oswald acted alone...how in the hell do get off 6 shots within the allotted time w/ a piece of $hit Mannlicher-Carcano rifle
                              You're right, it is insane to think he got off 6 shots in the timeframe. That's because he didn't. There were 3 shots fired. The first shot missed. The second shot is the one known as the magic bullet, even though the ABC Jennings piece debunked it as not being magic at all (it pierced straight through Kennedy's neck and hit Connolly in the right breast, all in a straight line originating straight back at the snipers' perch). The third shot was the fatal headblow that blew open Kennedy's head (also infamous from the JFK movie as "back and to the left").

                              3 shots, not 6, and perfectly manageable by a skilled marksman such as Oswald, who achieved this level of shot skill in the military. There is documented proof of him being a skilled marksman. In the ABC Jennings piece, they brought on a war veteran to simulate firing off 3 shots with a Mannlicher-Carcano. The veteran, without much rushing, got through the 3 shots, with time to aim on each one, in less than the time spent for the 3 shots on JFK.

                              To me, this is damning evidence in the direction of Oswald, and supports the single-shooter theory fairly well.

                              Comment

                              Working...