If you have any suggestions on events or people(basically anything 1960's related) PLEASE don't be shy.
Research topics for JFK assasination
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Research topics for JFK assasination
Help...I'm stuck.
If you have any suggestions on events or people(basically anything 1960's related) PLEASE don't be shy.Tags: None -
-
Re: Research topics for JFK assasination
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...v=glance&n=130Originally posted by Vinceanity2k3Help...I'm stuck.
If you have any suggestions on events or people(basically anything 1960's related) PLEASE don't be shy.
This is a by far the best account with factual and scientific backing on the JFK assassination you will ever see. It was a 20/20 special that aired a couple months before peter jennings died. Strongly Suggested."Good music transcends all physical limits, it's more then something you hear, it's something that you feel, when the author, experience, and passion is real" - Murs (And this is for)Comment
-
Re: Research topics for JFK assasination
This ish is complicated. I'm gonna stick with it, but I'm having trouble understanding. I know this isn't a good forum to post this stuff, but even today, I don't get all this crap about recoils, heads moving backwards or frontwards, shots in the rear and whatnot...Comment
-
Re: Research topics for JFK assasination
Buy or rent that DVD and the project will be a breeze. Trust me.Originally posted by Vinceanity2k3This ish is complicated. I'm gonna stick with it, but I'm having trouble understanding. I know this isn't a good forum to post this stuff, but even today, I don't get all this crap about recoils, heads moving backwards or frontwards, shots in the rear and whatnot..."Good music transcends all physical limits, it's more then something you hear, it's something that you feel, when the author, experience, and passion is real" - Murs (And this is for)Comment
-
Re: Research topics for JFK assasination
JFK, ASSASSINATION, JOHN, KENNEDY, KENNEDY ASSASSINATION, JFK ASSASSINATION, CONSPIRACY, THEORY, ASSASINATION, JFK ASSASINATION, MEDICAL, Judyth Baker, Judyth Vary Baker, evidence, Jim Garrison, Lee, Oswald, James, Files, Dealey Plaza, Single, Magic, Bullet, Jack, Ruby, CIA, FBI, NEWSGROUP, ARRB, Assassination Records, Board, MARK LANE, SINGLE BULLET THEORY
Resources on the John F. Kennedy assassination, the Warren Commission, Lee Harvey Oswald, the Jim Garrison investigation in New Orleans, Oliver Stone's conspiracy movie JFK, and Nigel Turner's The Men Who Killed Kennedy.
Comment
-
Re: Research topics for JFK assasination
I hope you aren't researching this subject for school, because finding non-bias sources when it comes to JFK's assassination is almost IMPOSSIBLE at this point. FWIW, I think the Jennings piece (I actually watched this when it first aired) is pretty credible, and gives off the last 'tinfoil hat' type of vibe. That's just me though.
I initially wanted to believe in multiple shooters and/or Oswald being involved with others, but there just isn't enough evidence FOR this. Because of occam's razor, I believe that Oswald acted alone. The one that I can't understand is the uncanny deaths of so many people even remotely tied to the case.Comment
-
Re: Research topics for JFK assasination
Thats why I think the jennings piece is the best place to start. The piece was fair and backed up info with scientific evidence.Originally posted by GBrushTWoodI hope you aren't researching this subject for school, because finding non-bias sources when it comes to JFK's assassination is almost IMPOSSIBLE at this point. FWIW, I think the Jennings piece (I actually watched this when it first aired) is pretty credible, and gives off the last 'tinfoil hat' type of vibe. That's just me though.
I initially wanted to believe in multiple shooters and/or Oswald being involved with others, but there just isn't enough evidence FOR this. Because of occam's razor, I believe that Oswald acted alone. The one that I can't understand is the uncanny deaths of so many people even remotely tied to the case."Good music transcends all physical limits, it's more then something you hear, it's something that you feel, when the author, experience, and passion is real" - Murs (And this is for)Comment
-
Re: Research topics for JFK assasination
Conspiracy theorists would say otherwise. They'd say the Jennings piece relied too much on Posner, who is the single most pro-Oswald-alone guy around.Originally posted by USF11Thats why I think the jennings piece is the best place to start. The piece was fair and backed up info with scientific evidence.Comment
-
Re: Research topics for JFK assasination
I am way over my head with this crap. I already gavce my proposal and I'm supposed to give my preliminary Bibliographical sources tomorrow morning. There is NOTHING of relevant or credible substance on the research Databases that I'm using.Originally posted by GBrushTWoodI hope you aren't researching this subject for school, because finding non-bias sources when it comes to JFK's assassination is almost IMPOSSIBLE at this point. FWIW, I think the Jennings piece (I actually watched this when it first aired) is pretty credible, and gives off the last 'tinfoil hat' type of vibe. That's just me though.
I initially wanted to believe in multiple shooters and/or Oswald being involved with others, but there just isn't enough evidence FOR this. Because of occam's razor, I believe that Oswald acted alone. The one that I can't understand is the uncanny deaths of so many people even remotely tied to the case.
I'm screwed. I knew I should've never chose this as my topic.Comment
-
Re: Research topics for JFK assasination
LOL..I'm pretty much in the same position as you with a research paper I have to write for a class as well (though it is technology related). The key to success here: perform some major league bull****ting.Originally posted by Vinceanity2k3I am way over my head with this crap. I already gavce my proposal and I'm supposed to give my preliminary Bibliographical sources tomorrow morning. There is NOTHING of relevant or credible substance on the research Databases that I'm using.
I'm screwed. I knew I should've never chose this as my topic.
Maybe you can focus on one aspect of the JFK assassination, like the entire Jim Garrison saga? Maybe research his motives for bringing those sham charges against Clay Shaw? Not sure what kind of original conclusion you could use with that though. It's something interesting IMO, and you could waste some time watching the Oliver Stone JFK movie. Maybe debunk the JFK movie as a paper?
Just don't use WikiPedia.org on your citation page.
Comment
-
Re: Research topics for JFK assasination
It's ABSOLUTELY INSANE to believe Oswald acted alone...how in the hell do get off 6 shots within the allotted time w/ a piece of $hit Mannlicher-Carcano rifle,BOLT ACTION,w/4 POWER scope...if you'll LISTEN to the shots fired...you'll here...bam bam...bam bam bam bam THAT fast...there's NO WAY this rifle could have fired those shots...that fast...unless it was automatic!Originally posted by GBrushTWoodI hope you aren't researching this subject for school, because finding non-bias sources when it comes to JFK's assassination is almost IMPOSSIBLE at this point. FWIW, I think the Jennings piece (I actually watched this when it first aired) is pretty credible, and gives off the last 'tinfoil hat' type of vibe. That's just me though.
I initially wanted to believe in multiple shooters and/or Oswald being involved with others, but there just isn't enough evidence FOR this. Because of occam's razor, I believe that Oswald acted alone. The one that I can't understand is the uncanny deaths of so many people even remotely tied to the case.
An EXPERT marksman tried getting off three shots in the allotted time with the actual model of gun that was used in the assassination, and despite being an expert marksman, he COULD NOT do it.
Plus...there were too many eye witnesses stated they heard shots & seen smoke from the grassy knoll area...and Ruby Killed the canary, that was gettin' ready to sing.
That was a SAD day...to this day
Comment
-
Re: Research topics for JFK assasination
You're right, it is insane to think he got off 6 shots in the timeframe. That's because he didn't. There were 3 shots fired. The first shot missed. The second shot is the one known as the magic bullet, even though the ABC Jennings piece debunked it as not being magic at all (it pierced straight through Kennedy's neck and hit Connolly in the right breast, all in a straight line originating straight back at the snipers' perch). The third shot was the fatal headblow that blew open Kennedy's head (also infamous from the JFK movie as "back and to the left").Originally posted by MotownIt's ABSOLUTELY INSANE to believe Oswald acted alone...how in the hell do get off 6 shots within the allotted time w/ a piece of $hit Mannlicher-Carcano rifle
3 shots, not 6, and perfectly manageable by a skilled marksman such as Oswald, who achieved this level of shot skill in the military. There is documented proof of him being a skilled marksman. In the ABC Jennings piece, they brought on a war veteran to simulate firing off 3 shots with a Mannlicher-Carcano. The veteran, without much rushing, got through the 3 shots, with time to aim on each one, in less than the time spent for the 3 shots on JFK.
To me, this is damning evidence in the direction of Oswald, and supports the single-shooter theory fairly well.Comment

Comment