YouTube vs. Photobucket

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daflyboys
    Banned
    • May 2003
    • 18238

    #1

    YouTube vs. Photobucket

    Man, people here at least need to start UL there stuff to Photobucket vs. YouTube. YT quality is so butt poor. Here's a comparison......

    YouTube:

    <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HAdAj0KggyE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HAdAj0KggyE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

    Photobucket:

    <embed width="448" height="361" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" src="http://img.photobucket.com/player.swf?file=http://vidmg.photobucket.com/albums/v610/Daflyboys/mulhollandgloveoptional.flv"></embed>


    It's not that PB is HD or anything, but I think it generally gives better quality overall.
    Last edited by daflyboys; 10-22-2007, 12:38 PM.
  • jmood88
    Sean Payton: Retribution
    • Jul 2003
    • 34639

    #2
    Re: YouTube vs. Photobucket

    Gametrailers has the best quality for streaming.
    Originally posted by Blzer
    Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

    If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

    Comment

    • daflyboys
      Banned
      • May 2003
      • 18238

      #3
      Re: YouTube vs. Photobucket

      Originally posted by jmood88
      Gametrailers has the best quality for streaming.

      You can UL to there?

      Comment

      • eDotd
        We ain't cool de la?
        • Jul 2006
        • 6284

        #4
        Re: YouTube vs. Photobucket

        Can't really say which is better from that comparison. Should've posted the same clip on youtube and PB.

        As far a as quality goes, Gametrailers, Brightcove, and Stage6 all beat youtube & photobucket.

        I personally think Stage6 is the clearest. It's just that you have to encode your video in xvid/divx for it to play.

        Originally posted by Con-Con
        Honestly, some of the posters on here are acting like Rob Jones boned your girl while you were at work, on you own sheets BTW.
        Originally posted by trobinson97
        Mo is the Operator from the Matrix.

        Comment

        • jmood88
          Sean Payton: Retribution
          • Jul 2003
          • 34639

          #5
          Re: YouTube vs. Photobucket

          Originally posted by daflyboys
          You can UL to there?
          Yeah you can. Momentous has uploaded some of his videos on Gametrailers.
          Originally posted by Blzer
          Let me assure you that I am a huge proponent of size, and it greatly matters. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

          If I went any bigger, it would not have properly fit with my equipment, so I had to optimize. I'm okay with it, but I also know what I'm missing with those five inches. :)

          Comment

          • Holic
            All Star
            • Feb 2003
            • 6424

            #6
            Re: YouTube vs. Photobucket

            The youtube video looks like it was shot with a camera, whereas the photobucket video looks like it was a direct feed. Although, I agree that youtube video quality sucks.

            Comment

            • youvalss
              ******
              • Feb 2007
              • 16599

              #7
              Re: YouTube vs. Photobucket

              Are there any popular sites where people share vids?
              My Specs:

              ZX Spectrum
              CPU: Z80 @ 3.5 MHz
              GPU: Monochrome display
              RAM: 48 KB
              OS: Sinclair BASIC

              Comment

              Working...