Ron wasn't completely disloyal. I think he had some good qualities, but the choice of best friend is really only justified from the fact that he was Harry's first friend. While he did always come back to Harry in the end, his loyalty sometimes floated with the wind. In a way that made him a more realistic character because he truly was the average person with tons of insecurities caught up in something bigger than him, but it also makes him an odd choice to have been Harry's best friend. Especially when you consider that the other member of the golden trio never left his side (further complicating that pairing but I digress). It just always left me irritated that we're supposed to believe this person is such a great friend when he abandoned his "best friend" multiple times when he needed support the most.
I think we get enough tid-bits on Ginny to formulate an idea of her character, but there isn't enough there to justify what a major part of the main character's life she becomes. Also, while it has been some time since I read the books if I recall correctly HBP is the first instance where Harry is shown to have any kind of thought to her that isn't strictly platonic (not all that surprising since she literally had about a dozen lines of narrative dedicated to her in the first 5+ books). Their "love" came about because J.K. Rowling decided to flip a switch in HBP turning Harry into this hormone obsessed teen with his "best friends" younger sister.. A character who he has been in close physical proximity to nearly every day for the last 6 years.
For Percy, there is definitely a difference between book smarts and cleverness. I don't disagree with that. However, he has to have a level of competency if we're to believe he achieved so many things. If he didn't then that creates an entirely different problem with his character and the story. If he had truly been career driven willing to forsake everything for his career (a rather Slytherin quality I might add), then why did he ever go back to try and get his family to turn away from Harry? I will say that of the ones I've mentioned Percy was still the most believable as a character, but even then isn't it oddly convenient that so many different plot points are being driven by this one family?
Molly's relationship, like was the case with several of the Weasley family members, was just too convenient. The first time Molly meets Harry is on the platform where she spends about 30 seconds explaining how to get to the train. Her 2nd meeting with him is a year later after her kids have basically helped Harry run away from home where she opens up her house to him without question. Isn't that just a bit odd? I would say that even a "Best Friends Mom" would want to know the kid a little before she becomes a motherly figure to him.
Then there is the overarching issue I have with the Weasley family. Their relationships and how they drove the plot was just too convenient. Ron is the first friend, Molly is the mother he never had, Ginny is his love interest, Percy is the antagonist (well one of them), etc..
Comment