Recommended Videos

Collapse

The Ignore Function

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    RAZRr1275
    All Star
    • Sep 2007
    • 9918

    Re: The Ignore Function


    Re: The Ignore Function

    Originally posted by TJdaSportsGuy
    Good...so you can't ignore me after I tell you this. Just because the word "post" rhymes with toast, it doesn't mean it's spelled like it.

    P-O-S-T

    Lol.
    My latest project - Madden 12 http://www.operationsports.com/forum...post2043231648

    Comment

    • #17
      ThreeKing
      Banned
      • Aug 2007
      • 5852

      Re: The Ignore Function


      Re: The Ignore Function

      I love it that you cannot misspell any words anymore on OS. No sarcasm. It makes for sensational, unintentional comedy.

      Comment

      • #18
        TJdaSportsGuy
        Hall Of Fame
        • Dec 2002
        • 11146

        Re: The Ignore Function


        Re: The Ignore Function

        Originally posted by ThreeKing
        I love it that you cannot misspell any words anymore on OS. No sarcasm. It makes for sensational, unintentional comedy.
        1 misspelled word doesn't hurt anyone's feelings. But when it's misspelled multiple times within a single post, that's when it becomes comedy.

        Comment

        • #19
          ThreeKing
          Banned
          • Aug 2007
          • 5852

          Re: The Ignore Function


          Re: The Ignore Function

          Originally posted by TJdaSportsGuy
          1 misspelled word doesn't hurt anyone's feelings. But when it's misspelled multiple times within a single post, that's when it becomes comedy.
          LOL.

          Comment

          • #20
            dkgojackets
            Banned
            • Mar 2005
            • 13816

            Re: The Ignore Function


            Re: The Ignore Function

            guise itt waz obviuosly intentchenal.

            *note that these were misspelled on porpoise too*

            I'm all about comedy.

            Comment

            • #21
              Blzer
              Resident film pundit
              • Mar 2004
              • 42698

              Re: The Ignore Function


              Re: The Ignore Function

              Originally posted by dkgojackets
              2) I don't want to know if the ignored user ever poasted. Even if I can't read it, you feel the presence. I know they might be laming up a thread. So instead of seeing the "you have ignored this user" message, can the offender just be blocked completely as if he/she doesn't exist? It would probably cause a skip in the reply number, but I might not notice.
              If that happened, then you can't see some of their smokin' hot avatars that make them more worthy than the posters themselves.

              BTW when I read the first time you said "poasters", I read it as "poachers".
              Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

              Comment

              • #22
                ThreeKing
                Banned
                • Aug 2007
                • 5852

                Re: The Ignore Function


                Re: The Ignore Function

                Originally posted by dkgojackets
                guise itt waz obviuosly intentchenal.

                *note that these were misspelled on porpoise too*

                I'm all about comedy.
                Nope. See, when you are trying real hard to be funny, it doesn't work.

                BTW, Fresno State 40 Georgia Tech 28........

                Comment

                • #23
                  dkgojackets
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 13816

                  Re: The Ignore Function


                  Re: The Ignore Function

                  You cant see avatars anyway. There's just an annoying break in the content of a thread that tells you a crappy response was recently made.

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    ThreeKing
                    Banned
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 5852

                    Re: The Ignore Function


                    Re: The Ignore Function

                    Originally posted by dkgojackets
                    You cant see avatars anyway. There's just an annoying break in the content of a thread that tells you a crappy response was recently made.
                    LOL. Nice.

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      dkgojackets
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2005
                      • 13816

                      Re: The Ignore Function


                      Re: The Ignore Function

                      Originally posted by ThreeKing
                      Nope. See, when you are trying real hard to be funny, it doesn't work.

                      BTW, Fresno State 40 Georgia Tech 28........
                      These types of replies are just bad and derail threads.

                      So what if Tenuta wanted to play his backups? Go for it on fourth downs early? He was already denied the head coaching position and had quit as DC. He was never going back to the team. What incentive was there for him?

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        ThreeKing
                        Banned
                        • Aug 2007
                        • 5852

                        Re: The Ignore Function


                        Re: The Ignore Function

                        Originally posted by dkgojackets
                        These types of replies are just bad and derail threads.

                        So what if Tenuta wanted to play his backups? Go for it on fourth downs early? He was already denied the head coaching position and had quit as DC. He was never going back to the team. What incentive was there for him?
                        I don't know man. All I know is that G Tech lost in the poo-poo, ka-ka, pee-pee bowl.

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          dkgojackets
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2005
                          • 13816

                          Re: The Ignore Function


                          Re: The Ignore Function

                          Nothing you've said has anything to do with the ignore function, so please move along.

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            MC Fatigue
                            Banned
                            • Feb 2006
                            • 4150

                            Re: The Ignore Function


                            Re: The Ignore Function

                            Ignoring people is weak. I don't care how big of a dip**** someone is, I don't ignore anyone ever. Sometimes those same people make very good posts that are worth reading...

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              Sully
                              Hall Of Fame
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 16004

                              Re: The Ignore Function


                              Re: The Ignore Function

                              What did Timmay say? I have him on ignore.

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                Scottdau
                                Banned
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 32580

                                Re: The Ignore Function


                                Re: The Ignore Function

                                What did Sully say? I have him on ignore.

                                Comment

                                Working...