It seems like there's a lot of people who don't necessarily understand the way OS reviews (subsequently scores) games. I remember reading somewhere where people say ignore the score it's just there for game rankings/ rotten tomatoes etc... (and the actual text of the review is much more valuable at OS anyway)
Maybe somewhere on the front page, something could be written how about an OS review should be A)Read and understood and B) some of the criteria that OS looks at when deciding certain things. I know that a lot of different people write the reviews and complete calibration/standardization may not be possible.
But anything to keep the impending 5,222 post response to the Madden review may be helpful... there's a ton of new users this season it seems. Just my $.02
Maybe somewhere on the front page, something could be written how about an OS review should be A)Read and understood and B) some of the criteria that OS looks at when deciding certain things. I know that a lot of different people write the reviews and complete calibration/standardization may not be possible.
But anything to keep the impending 5,222 post response to the Madden review may be helpful... there's a ton of new users this season it seems. Just my $.02