Re: BKRich

[Vince]

Re: BKRich

Get over it TW.The fact that you're still arguing about it is preety sad.It's been said to death the more talented team won.

[twharry]

Re: BKRich

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
bkrich83 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />

I did an internship as the assistant coach at the local high school my sophomore and junior years of college. I have also worked as a hockey scout, so I know quite a bit about evaluating talent.


<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

You are comparing that to coaching in college? It's obvious you don't.

Again coach or play a down and then get a clue.

I'll take Mike Williams because he catches the ball when it comes to him, can not be pressed in man coverage, is so big that he kills zone coverage, is pretty much unstoppable in the redzone. I'll take him because he's a better football player.

As for education, my measley bachelor degree will have to suffice. As for football evaluation, my playing and coaching experience as well as that of several of my friends at both the D-1 and NFL level will have to do.

Edit: I neither coached nor played at the NFL level, that info I get from friends I played with or coached with in college.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

1. I have played and coached. And I have provided just as much evidence to support it as you have.
2. I'll take Williams over Edwards because he is younger and is putting up equal numbers to what Edwards is, and still has loads of potential. But right now, they are equal.
3. Again, if USC replaced Carroll with Tulane's staff, does USC win the Pac 10 or not?

Simple question.

[twharry]

Re: BKRich

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
bkrich83 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />

I did an internship as the assistant coach at the local high school my sophomore and junior years of college. I have also worked as a hockey scout, so I know quite a bit about evaluating talent.


<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

You are comparing that to coaching in college? It's obvious you don't.

Again coach or play a down and then get a clue.

I'll take Mike Williams because he catches the ball when it comes to him, can not be pressed in man coverage, is so big that he kills zone coverage, is pretty much unstoppable in the redzone. I'll take him because he's a better football player.

As for education, my measley bachelor degree will have to suffice. As for football evaluation, my playing and coaching experience as well as that of several of my friends at both the D-1 and NFL level will have to do.

Edit: I neither coached nor played at the NFL level, that info I get from friends I played with or coached with in college.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

1. I have played and coached. And I have provided just as much evidence to support it as you have.
2. I'll take Williams over Edwards because he is younger and is putting up equal numbers to what Edwards is, and still has loads of potential. But right now, they are equal.
3. Again, if USC replaced Carroll with Tulane's staff, does USC win the Pac 10 or not?

Simple question.

[twharry]

Re: BKRich

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
bkrich83 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />

I did an internship as the assistant coach at the local high school my sophomore and junior years of college. I have also worked as a hockey scout, so I know quite a bit about evaluating talent.


<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

You are comparing that to coaching in college? It's obvious you don't.

Again coach or play a down and then get a clue.

I'll take Mike Williams because he catches the ball when it comes to him, can not be pressed in man coverage, is so big that he kills zone coverage, is pretty much unstoppable in the redzone. I'll take him because he's a better football player.

As for education, my measley bachelor degree will have to suffice. As for football evaluation, my playing and coaching experience as well as that of several of my friends at both the D-1 and NFL level will have to do.

Edit: I neither coached nor played at the NFL level, that info I get from friends I played with or coached with in college.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

1. I have played and coached. And I have provided just as much evidence to support it as you have.
2. I'll take Williams over Edwards because he is younger and is putting up equal numbers to what Edwards is, and still has loads of potential. But right now, they are equal.
3. Again, if USC replaced Carroll with Tulane's staff, does USC win the Pac 10 or not?

Simple question.

[Programmed2Kill]

Re: BKRich

Thanks alot, Brian for making new friends. Dude had to give us his life rundown


Babes....USC won and looked better while doing it. Let it be.

[Programmed2Kill]

Re: BKRich

Thanks alot, Brian for making new friends. Dude had to give us his life rundown


Babes....USC won and looked better while doing it. Let it be.

[Programmed2Kill]

Re: BKRich

Thanks alot, Brian for making new friends. Dude had to give us his life rundown


Babes....USC won and looked better while doing it. Let it be.

[twharry]

Re: BKRich

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Vinceanity2k3 said:
Get over it TW.The fact that you're still arguing about it is preety sad.It's been said to death the more talented team won.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

And you can say it a million times. Doesn't make it true.

[twharry]

Re: BKRich

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Vinceanity2k3 said:
Get over it TW.The fact that you're still arguing about it is preety sad.It's been said to death the more talented team won.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

And you can say it a million times. Doesn't make it true.

[twharry]

Re: BKRich

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Vinceanity2k3 said:
Get over it TW.The fact that you're still arguing about it is preety sad.It's been said to death the more talented team won.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

And you can say it a million times. Doesn't make it true.

[twharry]

Re: BKRich

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Programmed2Kill said:
USC won and looked better while doing it. Let it be.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I agree wholeheartedly.

[twharry]

Re: BKRich

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Programmed2Kill said:
USC won and looked better while doing it. Let it be.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I agree wholeheartedly.

[twharry]

Re: BKRich

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Programmed2Kill said:
USC won and looked better while doing it. Let it be.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I agree wholeheartedly.

[bkrich83]

Re: BKRich

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Programmed2Kill said:
Thanks alot, Brian for making new friends. Dude had to give us his life rundown


Babes....USC won and looked better while doing it. Let it be.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I know P2k the homers bring out the best in me.

[bkrich83]

Re: BKRich

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Programmed2Kill said:
Thanks alot, Brian for making new friends. Dude had to give us his life rundown


Babes....USC won and looked better while doing it. Let it be.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I know P2k the homers bring out the best in me.