Re: FIFA 17 OS Community Sliders
Sliders Status: Set 4 - Tweaks
Test Number: #1 (10/21/16)
Difficulty Level: Pro, World Class, Legendary
Slider Values:
Shot Error from 52 to 53 - credit: @Velocityy
Sliders Status: Set 4 - Tweaks
Test Number: #1 (10/21/16)
Difficulty Level: Pro, World Class, Legendary
Slider Values:
Shot Error from 52 to 53 - credit: @Velocityy
- A slight increase here, but Velo tested 3 matches with it and it has significantly reduce the first time shots from the CPU. Much more build up at the top of the box, and makes for some varied play from the CPU in the defensive third. Does not remove shots in obvious positions either.
Shot Speed from 51 to 48 - credit: @Velocityy
Shot Speed from 51 to 48 - credit: @Velocityy
- Velo's favorite, and mine too. Seen some amazing shots with this value, some great "velocity" as well. Go figure. Don't worry, it's not too slow.
GK Ability from 50 to 55 - credit @Matt10
GK Ability from 50 to 55 - credit @Matt10
- Still testing, of course, but higher GK usually results in more aggression. Noticed on other lower values that the GK would try to save "below" the ball's flight. Also want to get these keepers out of their 6-yard box when it calls for it.
Line Length from 48 to 50 - credit @Matt10 , @lhsballa11
- This slight increase has now allowed the midfield to come into play further. At 48, it was still very easy to get through the midfield for both user and CPU. In addition, the attackers weren't met by the defensive line soon enough, which allowed them to turn and face goal much easier than they should.
Line Length from 48 to 50 - credit @Matt10 , @lhsballa11
- This slight increase has now allowed the midfield to come into play further. At 48, it was still very easy to get through the midfield for both user and CPU. In addition, the attackers weren't met by the defensive line soon enough, which allowed them to turn and face goal much easier than they should.
FB Positioning from 50 to 45 - credit @Matt10
- This value could go down further, but the lowering of FB is relevant to the height chosen at 60. The FB's already go up the pitch quite a bit, regardless, so lowering FB will now allow them to still go up the pitch, but not be completely exposed in transition, or counter attacks. This seems to be why a lot of the CPU's attack is aimed to be more direct, however, it still needs a bit more testing. Still trying to find the threshold that will allow the FB to play properly, but not to the point they don't get up the pitch at all.
- This value could go down further, but the lowering of FB is relevant to the height chosen at 60. The FB's already go up the pitch quite a bit, regardless, so lowering FB will now allow them to still go up the pitch, but not be completely exposed in transition, or counter attacks. This seems to be why a lot of the CPU's attack is aimed to be more direct, however, it still needs a bit more testing. Still trying to find the threshold that will allow the FB to play properly, but not to the point they don't get up the pitch at all.
FT Control Error from 60 to 0 - credit @Matt10
- Hear me out here. The test was to try to fix the CPU's "kamikaze" dribbling, as balla puts it. It was also to see if the first touches were still off the mark. I was not as optimistic, but was very surprised to see that not only had the dribbling right at the defensive line stopped, but the touches were off the mark as well. I feel this value "cancels out" any slider input, and goes to actual true ratings. This could be way off, but I've posted 2 videos already and it has already shown promise. Multiple guys have tested as well, and reflect the same conclusion. Can the value go higher? It hasn't been tested, but it will be looked at. However, at the moment, it looks and feels great.
- Hear me out here. The test was to try to fix the CPU's "kamikaze" dribbling, as balla puts it. It was also to see if the first touches were still off the mark. I was not as optimistic, but was very surprised to see that not only had the dribbling right at the defensive line stopped, but the touches were off the mark as well. I feel this value "cancels out" any slider input, and goes to actual true ratings. This could be way off, but I've posted 2 videos already and it has already shown promise. Multiple guys have tested as well, and reflect the same conclusion. Can the value go higher? It hasn't been tested, but it will be looked at. However, at the moment, it looks and feels great.
Comment