I've mentioned this in the PL thread before, and it's not something I knew about until hearing actual journalists (The Athletic podcast) and not pundits discuss how Man City works regarding transfers. They will spend big money on a player, but they will not play games, really. They set an evaluation and a price they're willing to pay, and if someone tries to go for something higher than that, they walk away.
I think this was clearly a Pep wanting Kane, but City's executive committee not wanting him as badly. They were willing to pay big, but they're not above walking away from someone being 'upset' or insulted by their massive opening bid.
Does't mean they couldn't have handled it better, but they're not as much of a run and gun wild spending machine as they can be made out to be. They spend, but they're not PSG and in a way won't let themselves be pushed around or pay out of this world fees just because they can. If those other than Pep at City really wanted Kane, I think he'd be there right now.
If Kane was smart enough not to hire his brother as his agent, he'd have a different contract and might be at City right now because instead of teams playing bidding games with Levy, there'd be an actual clause in his contract.
[For the record, I hate them, their ownership, and what they along with the likes of PSG have done to the transfer market.]
Comment