Home

MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season

This is a discussion on MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season within the MLB The Show Last Gen forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Baseball > MLB The Show > MLB The Show Last Gen
Why Player Ratings Change When Starting Dynasty Mode in College Football 25
What Is Pro Yakyuu Spirits 2024/Professional Baseball Spirits 2024, and How Do You Get It?
The House Rules Hub for Recruiting in College Football 25 Dynasty Mode
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-06-2009, 03:08 AM   #41
Rookie
 
OVR: 3
Join Date: Oct 2006
As a Mets fan, I'll just be happy as long as the goofballs don't choke again.
karavalvin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 04-06-2009, 09:08 AM   #42
Rookie
 
OVR: 4
Join Date: Jul 2008
Most realistic game ever, yet Pitchers can't win RoY or MVP awards its lame this is a great game but definitely the most annoying game ever.
k_bassuka is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 09:23 AM   #43
Pro
 
masterkembo's Arena
 
OVR: 9
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Re: MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season

Quote:
Originally Posted by k_bassuka
Most realistic game ever, yet Pitchers can't win RoY or MVP awards its lame this is a great game but definitely the most annoying game ever.
I would like to point out that the last time a pitcher won the MVP was in 1992 (Eckersley). In fact, in the last 39 years, a total of 5 pitchers have one the MVP (6.4%), so it doesn't seem untirely unrealistic (or lame) that pitchers don't win the MVP award.
masterkembo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 10:25 AM   #44
Rookie
 
OVR: 4
Join Date: Jul 2008
Re: MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season

Quote:
Originally Posted by masterkembo
I would like to point out that the last time a pitcher won the MVP was in 1992 (Eckersley). In fact, in the last 39 years, a total of 5 pitchers have one the MVP (6.4%), so it doesn't seem untirely unrealistic (or lame) that pitchers don't win the MVP award.
It’s still a possibility and if a pitcher goes out there and win 24+ games in a year with a low ERA will win it unless someone has a B.Bonds type of year and break the single season HR record. It’s true that pitchers rarely win it but at least have the opportunity to do so, unlike in the most realistic game ever. So what’s the problem with

Quit making excuses for a broken part of the game.
k_bassuka is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 12:33 PM   #45
Rookie
 
OVR: 5
Join Date: Mar 2009
Re: MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season

Ok, so pitchers win the MVP 6.4% of the time, and yet based on one simmed season where a pitcher doesn't win it, you make the leap to say that the game (or even a part of it) is broken? Very logical argument.
BigWilly is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 04-06-2009, 02:41 PM   #46
Pro
 
masterkembo's Arena
 
OVR: 9
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Re: MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season

Quote:
Originally Posted by k_bassuka
It’s still a possibility and if a pitcher goes out there and win 24+ games in a year with a low ERA will win it unless someone has a B.Bonds type of year and break the single season HR record. It’s true that pitchers rarely win it but at least have the opportunity to do so, unlike in the most realistic game ever. So what’s the problem with

Quit making excuses for a broken part of the game.
2002: Randy Johnson, 24 W, 5L, 2.32ERA, 260 Innings, 334, SO.

That seems to meet your MVP requirements for a pitcher.

MPV: Barry Bonds with 46 Homeruns and 110RBIs which certainly isn't a 'homerun record breaking' season.

1996: John Smoltz, 24 W, 8L, 2.94ERA, 253.2 Innings, 276 SO.

MVP: Ken Camaniti - 40 Homeruns, 130 RBIs (neither recrod breaking; in fact neither even lead the league)

1999: Pedro Martinez, 23W, 4L, 2.07ERA, 213.1 Innings, 313 SO.

MVP: Ivan Rodriguez, 35 Homeruns, 113 RBI (neither league leading)

All three of those pitchers meet your MVP criteria, yet none of them won the MVP, and the guys that did win certainly did not have record breaking stats.

So, is it broken when a pitcher doesn't win MVP in the game?? Absolutely not! Considering a pitcher hasn't won the MVP in 16 seasons IRL, and there has been pitchers that have had big seasons since then, and they haven't won the MVP, I think it's fair that pitchers haven't won the MVP in your season(s).

Edit: Pedro was the only of those 3 guys that was even in the top 3 in voting. Randy Johnson finished 7th in voting in his 24 win season.

Last edited by masterkembo; 04-06-2009 at 02:52 PM.
masterkembo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 03:12 PM   #47
MVP
 
choadler's Arena
 
OVR: 14
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Orange County
Posts: 2,002
Re: MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season

Wow, I guess that put that argument to rest about pitchers and MVP...Nice post masterkembo.

Funny how people's perceptions and what they feel is realistic and not realistic is so far off.
choadler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 04:39 PM   #48
Rookie
 
OVR: 4
Join Date: Jul 2008
Re: MLB 09: The Show Simulates the 2009 Season

Quote:
Originally Posted by masterkembo
2002: Randy Johnson, 24 W, 5L, 2.32ERA, 260 Innings, 334, SO.

That seems to meet your MVP requirements for a pitcher.

MPV: Barry Bonds with 46 Homeruns and 110RBIs which certainly isn't a 'homerun record breaking' season.

1996: John Smoltz, 24 W, 8L, 2.94ERA, 253.2 Innings, 276 SO.

MVP: Ken Camaniti - 40 Homeruns, 130 RBIs (neither recrod breaking; in fact neither even lead the league)

1999: Pedro Martinez, 23W, 4L, 2.07ERA, 213.1 Innings, 313 SO.

MVP: Ivan Rodriguez, 35 Homeruns, 113 RBI (neither league leading)

All three of those pitchers meet your MVP criteria, yet none of them won the MVP, and the guys that did win certainly did not have record breaking stats.

So, is it broken when a pitcher doesn't win MVP in the game?? Absolutely not! Considering a pitcher hasn't won the MVP in 16 seasons IRL, and there has been pitchers that have had big seasons since then, and they haven't won the MVP, I think it's fair that pitchers haven't won the MVP in your season(s).

Edit: Pedro was the only of those 3 guys that was even in the top 3 in voting. Randy Johnson finished 7th in voting in his 24 win season.

1996: Smoltz put up great stats playing for a great team maybe the best in the majors; they had the best pitching staff by far.

Caminiti took an average at best team to the playoffs, and put up great numbers
.326 BA 40 HR 79 XBH 110 R 130 RBI 11 SB

1999: Pedro should’ve won the award if you ask me, the only reason he didn’t is because some writers didn’t like him and some refuse to give their MVP vote to a pitcher, Pudge didn’t help by having one of the better seasons by a catcher offensively (rare by a catcher at the time) and defensively. If this would’ve happened after a Blo Soxs WS he would’ve won it.

2002: AZ had 2 pitchers that won 20+ games and they also had a great team and it showed by winning the WS.

Bonds continue his dominance, after hitting 73 the year prior he was on track to break that record, until that coach decided it was best to walk him even with bases loaded than to pitch to him. That’s why he didn’t hit more HR and still had one of the better seasons by a hitter.
.370 BA 46 HR 79 XBH 117 R 110 RBI 198 BB

He took a bad team and had them competing with the more talented AZ. He clearly was more important to his team than RJ. And voters believed that if they had pitched to him he would’ve beaten the 73 mark.

But you made my point for me those pitchers were in the MVP discussion those years and that doesn’t happen in this game, you can win 25 heck even 40 games playing for the Pirates and have no shot at winning the MVP, while on real life it would be a no brainer.

P.S. this is baseball, almost anything it’s possible too bad that the developers didn’t get the memo.
k_bassuka is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Baseball > MLB The Show > MLB The Show Last Gen »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12 AM.
Top -