Updated Wrigley field ?

[NewNapkin]

Wrigley was already made with the new video boards and everything for MLB '15, but they had to be removed before the game was released for legal reasons.

[HozAndMoose]

Quote: Originally Posted by KGHerm

Wrigley was already made with the new video boards and everything for MLB '15, but they had to be removed before the game was released for legal reasons.

Didnt the rooftop owners and the Cubs get that sorted out recently?

[HypoLuxa13]

Quote: Originally Posted by HozAndMoose

Didnt the rooftop owners and the Cubs get that sorted out recently?

No official word, but the construction of the jumbotron in right field is continuing. Kinda makes it seem like some sort of settlement was reached. Rooftop owners were likely going to lose anyway, based on the way the contract was set up. It would have been in their best interest to take some kind of payoff to walk away.

[DrYCeLL]

Quote: Originally Posted by HozAndMoose

Nope. The size of the file would be to big. And i believe they are already working on 16 so it just wouldnt be worth it.

No file size is too big for a Cubs fan. Besides, realistically, how big of a file would it even be? Almost every update for any game checks in around a gig nowadays. If it were a .99c download, even at 2gb I'd jump on it. If the version we saw early on with the boards included was finished, or even mostly finished, I don't see what the problem is.

[countryboy]

Quote: Originally Posted by DrYCeLL

No file size is too big for a Cubs fan. Besides, realistically, how big of a file would it even be? Almost every update for any game checks in around a gig nowadays. If it were a .99c download, even at 2gb I'd jump on it. If the version we saw early on with the boards included was finished, or even mostly finished, I don't see what the problem is.

they were told that the new Wrigley Field renovations could not be in the game this year.

[GRob78]

Quote: Originally Posted by DrYCeLL

No file size is too big for a Cubs fan.

And that, my friends, is the heart of baseball. Thank you.

[ken32turley]

Knowing that they already had this done before they were forced to take it out should make it much easier to just add it now that the legal problems are over. If they are being put it in real life then why wouldn't it be okay to do so now?

[cts50]

Quote: Originally Posted by HozAndMoose

Didnt the rooftop owners and the Cubs get that sorted out recently?

They basically had it sorted out prior to the season.

It was really pretty silly of SCEA to take the whole thing out of the game. The rooftop owners were never going to go after a freaking video game.

The whole case was about the rooftop views being obstructed by the signs. Were they afraid the virtual rooftop owners were going to sue them?