Home

MLB 16 Franchise Progression/Regression Thread

This is a discussion on MLB 16 Franchise Progression/Regression Thread within the MLB The Show forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Baseball > MLB The Show
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2016, 12:23 AM   #17
Rookie
 
newmich's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Oct 2011
Re: MLB 16 Franchise Progression/Regression Thread

So after year 3 there are a few things already catching my eye. The 3rd year only had 4 batters with an average above .300, 1 above .310 which was a .312. Another thing that is catching my eye is the retirees. So far there have been 15 players retire due to injury (4 year 1, 4 year 2, and 7 in year 4). One last notable is the caliber of some players retiring, for example year 3 saw I. Kinsler 35 years old 86 Ovr, Fister 34 years old 87 Ovr, Y. Molina 35 years old 82 Ovr, and Wainwright 36 years old 84 Ovr.

Again this is just a glimpse of what is going on and things could change in the next 7 seasons. Also I would like to add that I did turn scouting on for this. I understand that drastically affects the ratings of prospect, but this will give us a good comparison to how well the new scouting system is/isn't implemented in MLB 16.

Sent from my SM-S920L using Tapatalk
newmich is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2016, 01:23 AM   #18
Rookie
 
newmich's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Oct 2011
Re: MLB 16 Franchise Progression/Regression Thread

So in year 4 I just had something weird happen for the first time. I was simming in September and I got the notification that I had an important message. I said no to stop simming and a few days later I got the notification again. This time I stopped to see what it was.......the Nationals placed Harper on the waiver wire! I tried to claim him think it was a revocable waiver and unfortunately I got him since it was an outright waiver.

So four years through and already we are seeing franchise rear it's ugly head. Seeing that I have never had that happen before I am hoping it is just some weird quirk but I am obviously going to be keeping an eye on that now as well.

Sent from my SM-S920L using Tapatalk
newmich is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2016, 01:37 AM   #19
MVP
 
R9NALD9's Arena
 
OVR: 16
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Re: MLB 16 Franchise Progression/Regression Thread

Super disappointed to hear this...

Was planning on focusing on franchise this year. I alternate from year to year between Rtts and Franchise. 15 was Rtts year, and this year I was super excited for franchise...seems I'll have to wait for a patch.
__________________
San Francisco 49ers
San Francisco Giants
Chicago Bulls
R9NALD9 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2016, 01:40 AM   #20
MVP
 
HozAndMoose's Arena
 
OVR: 7
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kansas City
Re: MLB 16 Franchise Progression/Regression Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by R9NALD9
Super disappointed to hear this...

Was planning on focusing on franchise this year. I alternate from year to year between Rtts and Franchise. 15 was Rtts year, and this year I was super excited for franchise...seems I'll have to wait for a patch.
Im pretty sure he is testing with 15 right now.
HozAndMoose is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2016, 02:11 AM   #21
Rookie
 
newmich's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Oct 2011
Re: MLB 16 Franchise Progression/Regression Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by R9NALD9
Super disappointed to hear this...

Was planning on focusing on franchise this year. I alternate from year to year between Rtts and Franchise. 15 was Rtts year, and this year I was super excited for franchise...seems I'll have to wait for a patch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HozAndMoose
Im pretty sure he is testing with 15 right now.
Yup I am just testing 15 right now so no need to worry I am 5 seasons done so far and will keep posting things I find notable as I get through to year 10. I did notice that Matt Harvey went from a 94 to an 88 overall from the ages of 29 to 30 and Syndegard (sorry for the spelling, I'm not at my tv) also dropped off in year 5. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, I just figured I'd let you guys know so you can post your thoughts.

Sent from my SM-S920L using Tapatalk
newmich is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 03-24-2016, 05:32 AM   #22
MVP
 
R9NALD9's Arena
 
OVR: 16
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Re: MLB 16 Franchise Progression/Regression Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by newmich
Yup I am just testing 15 right now so no need to worry I am 5 seasons done so far and will keep posting things I find notable as I get through to year 10. I did notice that Matt Harvey went from a 94 to an 88 overall from the ages of 29 to 30 and Syndegard (sorry for the spelling, I'm not at my tv) also dropped off in year 5. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, I just figured I'd let you guys know so you can post your thoughts.

Sent from my SM-S920L using Tapatalk
Well high fiving myself for overreacting. That sure is a relief!
__________________
San Francisco 49ers
San Francisco Giants
Chicago Bulls
R9NALD9 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 04:17 PM   #23
Rookie
 
newmich's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Oct 2011
Re: MLB 16 Franchise Progression/Regression Thread

Hey OS community,

I apologize for the delay since I last updated you guys on this experiment. Between working on my car stereo, having the girl over, watching the Badgers epically choke, and homework I haven't given myself much time to work on this haha. I might be able to finish simming everything tonight after work otherwise assuming I don't work on Monday I should have everything done before MLB 16 comes out at 12ET.

Thank you for your patience and have a wonderful Easter everyone!!!!
newmich is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2016, 09:02 AM   #24
Pro
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jun 2012
MLB 16 Franchise Progression/Regression Thread

Hopefully 16 finds the middle ground with pitchers and hitters. In 14 most threw low to mid 80's and everyone hit over .300, in 15 most threw mid to high 90's and everyone barely reached .300.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Athletics Franchise:

2020: 52-39
Greencollarbaseball is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Baseball > MLB The Show »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM.
Top -